用于表皮葡萄球菌生物膜药敏试验的微孔板阿拉玛蓝法。
Microplate Alamar blue assay for Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm susceptibility testing.
作者信息
Pettit Robin K, Weber Christine A, Kean Melissa J, Hoffmann Holger, Pettit George R, Tan Rui, Franks Kelly S, Horton Marilyn L
机构信息
Cancer Research Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-2404, USA.
出版信息
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Jul;49(7):2612-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.7.2612-2617.2005.
Biofilms are at the root of many infections largely because they are much more antibiotic resistant than their planktonic counterparts. Antibiotics that target the biofilm phenotype are desperately needed, but there is still no standard method to assess biofilm drug susceptibility. Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 biofilms treated with eight different approved antibiotics and five different experimental compounds were exposed to the oxidation reduction indicator Alamar blue for 60 min, and reduction relative to untreated controls was determined visually and spectrophotometrically. The minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration was defined as < or = 50% reduction and a purplish well 60 min after the addition of Alamar blue. All of the approved antibiotics had biofilm MICs (MBICs) of >512 microg/ml (most >4,096 microg/ml), and four of the experimental compounds had MBICs of < or = 128 microg/ml. The experimental aaptamine derivative hystatin 3 was used to correlate Alamar blue reduction with 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT) reduction and viable counts (CFU/ml) for S. epidermidis ATCC 35984, ATCC 12228, and two clinical isolates. For all four strains, Alamar blue results correlated well with XTT (r = 0.83 to 0.97) and with CFU/ml results (r = 0.85 to 0.94). Alamar blue's stability and lack of toxicity allowed CFU/ml to be determined from the same wells as Alamar blue absorbances. If the described method of microplate Alamar blue biofilm susceptibility testing, which is simple, reproducible, cost-effective, nontoxic, and amenable to high throughput, is applicable to other important biofilm forming species, it should greatly facilitate the discovery of biofilm specific agents.
生物膜是许多感染的根源,很大程度上是因为它们比浮游菌具有更强的抗生素耐药性。迫切需要针对生物膜表型的抗生素,但目前仍没有评估生物膜药物敏感性的标准方法。用八种不同的已批准抗生素和五种不同的实验化合物处理表皮葡萄球菌ATCC 35984生物膜,将其暴露于氧化还原指示剂阿拉玛蓝60分钟,通过目视和分光光度法测定相对于未处理对照的还原率。最低生物膜抑制浓度定义为加入阿拉玛蓝60分钟后还原率≤50%且孔呈紫色。所有已批准的抗生素的生物膜最低抑菌浓度(MBIC)均>512微克/毫升(大多数>4096微克/毫升),四种实验化合物的MBIC≤128微克/毫升。使用实验性的水胺硫磷衍生物抑素3将阿拉玛蓝还原率与2,3-双(2-甲氧基-4-硝基-5-磺基苯基)-2H-四氮唑-5-羧基苯胺(XTT)还原率以及表皮葡萄球菌ATCC 35984、ATCC 12228和两株临床分离株的活菌数(CFU/毫升)进行关联。对于所有四株菌株,阿拉玛蓝结果与XTT(r = 0.83至0.97)以及CFU/毫升结果(r = 0.85至0.94)相关性良好。阿拉玛蓝的稳定性和无毒性使得可以从与阿拉玛蓝吸光度相同的孔中测定CFU/毫升。如果所描述的微孔板阿拉玛蓝生物膜药敏试验方法简单、可重复、经济高效、无毒且适用于高通量,并且适用于其他重要的生物膜形成菌种,那么它将极大地促进生物膜特异性药物的发现。
相似文献
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005-7
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2009-10-27
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009-1
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015-1-3
Pol J Microbiol. 2005
引用本文的文献
NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2025-4-1
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024
Front Microbiol. 2024-4-16
本文引用的文献
Int J Oncol. 1993-9
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003-12
J Clin Microbiol. 2003-1
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002-8