Skyler Jay S, Weinstock Ruth S, Raskin Philip, Yale Jean-François, Barrett Eugene, Gerich John E, Gerstein Hertzel C
University of Miami, School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2005 Jul;28(7):1630-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1630.
Despite the demonstrated benefits of glycemic control, patient acceptance of basal/bolus insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes has been slow. We investigated whether a basal/bolus insulin regimen involving rapid-acting, dry powder, inhaled insulin could provide glycemic control comparable with a basal/bolus subcutaneous regimen.
Patients with type 1 diabetes (ages 12-65 years) received twice-daily subcutaneous NPH insulin and were randomized to premeal inhaled insulin (n = 163) or subcutaneous regular insulin (n = 165) for 6 months.
Mean glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) decreased comparably from baseline in the inhaled and subcutaneous insulin groups (-0.3 and -0.1%, respectively; adjusted difference -0.16% [CI -0.34 to 0.01]), with a similar percentage of subjects achieving A1C <7%. Although 2-h postprandial glucose reductions were comparable between the groups, fasting plasma glucose levels declined more in the inhaled than in the subcutaneous insulin group (adjusted difference -39.5 mg/dl [CI -57.5 to -21.6]). Inhaled insulin was associated with a lower overall hypoglycemia rate but higher severe hypoglycemia rate. The overall hypoglycemia rate (episodes/patient-month) was 9.3 (inhaled) vs. 9.9 (subcutaneous) (risk ratio [RR] 0.94 [CI 0.91-0.97]), and the severe hypoglycemia rate (episodes/100 patient-months) was 6.5 vs. 3.3 (RR 2.00 [CI 1.28-3.12]). Increased insulin antibody serum binding without associated clinical manifestations occurred in the inhaled insulin group. Pulmonary function between the groups was comparable, except for a decline in carbon monoxide-diffusing capacity in the inhaled insulin group without any clinical correlates.
Inhaled insulin may provide an alternative for the management of type 1 diabetes as part of a basal/bolus strategy in patients who are unwilling or unable to use preprandial insulin injections.
尽管血糖控制已显示出诸多益处,但1型糖尿病患者对基础/餐时胰岛素治疗的接受程度一直较慢。我们研究了一种包含速效、干粉吸入式胰岛素的基础/餐时胰岛素方案是否能提供与基础/餐时皮下注射方案相当的血糖控制效果。
1型糖尿病患者(年龄12 - 65岁)接受每日两次的皮下中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素治疗,并被随机分为餐前吸入胰岛素组(n = 163)或皮下注射常规胰岛素组(n = 165),为期6个月。
吸入胰岛素组和皮下胰岛素组的平均糖化血红蛋白(A1C)较基线水平的下降幅度相当(分别为-0.3%和-0.1%;校正差异为-0.16% [CI -0.34至0.01]),达到A1C <7%的受试者比例相似。尽管两组间餐后2小时血糖降低幅度相当,但吸入胰岛素组的空腹血糖水平下降幅度大于皮下胰岛素组(校正差异为-39.5 mg/dl [CI -57.5至-21.6])。吸入胰岛素与总体低血糖发生率较低但严重低血糖发生率较高相关。总体低血糖发生率(事件数/患者月)为9.3(吸入组)对9.9(皮下组)(风险比[RR] 0.94 [CI 0.91 - 0.97]),严重低血糖发生率(事件数/100患者月)为6.5对3.3(RR 2.00 [CI 1.28 - 3.12])。吸入胰岛素组出现胰岛素抗体血清结合增加但无相关临床表现。除吸入胰岛素组一氧化碳弥散能力下降且无任何临床相关表现外,两组间肺功能相当。
对于不愿或无法使用餐前胰岛素注射的患者,吸入胰岛素作为基础/餐时策略的一部分,可能为1型糖尿病的管理提供一种替代方法。