• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生使用计算机化医嘱录入系统开具药物处方:系统评价。

Physicians' Use of the Computerized Physician Order Entry System for Medication Prescribing: Systematic Review.

作者信息

Mogharbel Asra, Dowding Dawn, Ainsworth John

机构信息

Division of Informatics Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Centre for Health Informatics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 4;9(3):e22923. doi: 10.2196/22923.

DOI:10.2196/22923
PMID:33661126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7974763/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems in health care settings have many benefits for prescribing medication, such as improved quality of patient care and patient safety. However, to achieve their full potential, the factors influencing the usage of CPOE systems by physicians must be identified and understood.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to identify the factors influencing the usage of CPOE systems by physicians for medication prescribing in their clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the literature on this topic using four databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase. Searches were performed from September 2019 to December 2019. The retrieved papers were screened by examining the titles and abstracts of relevant studies; two reviewers screened the full text of potentially relevant papers for inclusion in the review. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies with the aim of conducting assessments or investigations of factors influencing the use of CPOE for medication prescribing among physicians were included. The identified factors were grouped based on constructs from two models: the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model and the Delone and McLean Information System Success Model. We used the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool to assess the quality of the included studies and narrative synthesis to report the results.

RESULTS

A total of 11 articles were included in the review, and 37 factors related to the usage of CPOE systems were identified as the factors influencing how physicians used CPOE for medication prescribing. These factors represented three main themes: individual, technological, and organizational.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified the common factors that influenced the usage of CPOE systems by physicians for medication prescribing regardless of the type of setting or the duration of the use of a system by participants. Our findings can be used to inform implementation and support the usage of the CPOE system by physicians.

摘要

背景

医疗保健机构中的计算机化医师医嘱录入(CPOE)系统在药物处方开具方面有诸多益处,例如提高患者护理质量和患者安全。然而,要充分发挥其潜力,必须识别并理解影响医师使用CPOE系统的因素。

目的

本研究旨在识别影响医师在临床实践中使用CPOE系统进行药物处方开具的因素。

方法

我们使用四个数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Ovid MEDLINE和Embase)对该主题的文献进行了系统检索。检索时间为2019年9月至2019年12月。通过检查相关研究的标题和摘要对检索到的论文进行筛选;两名评审员对可能相关论文的全文进行筛选以纳入综述。纳入旨在评估或调查影响医师使用CPOE进行药物处方开具的因素的定性、定量和混合方法研究。根据两个模型(技术接受与使用统一理论模型和德洛内与麦克林信息系统成功模型)的结构对识别出的因素进行分组。我们使用混合方法评估工具评估纳入研究的质量,并采用叙述性综合法报告结果。

结果

综述共纳入11篇文章,识别出37个与CPOE系统使用相关的因素,这些因素影响医师使用CPOE进行药物处方开具的方式。这些因素代表三个主要主题:个人、技术和组织。

结论

本研究识别出了影响医师使用CPOE系统进行药物处方开具的常见因素,无论环境类型或参与者使用系统的时长如何。我们的研究结果可用于为CPOE系统的实施提供信息并支持医师对该系统的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e7b/7974763/fb3cacececfa/medinform_v9i3e22923_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e7b/7974763/fb3cacececfa/medinform_v9i3e22923_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e7b/7974763/fb3cacececfa/medinform_v9i3e22923_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Physicians' Use of the Computerized Physician Order Entry System for Medication Prescribing: Systematic Review.医生使用计算机化医嘱录入系统开具药物处方:系统评价。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 4;9(3):e22923. doi: 10.2196/22923.
2
Enabling medication management through health information technology (Health IT).通过健康信息技术(Health IT)实现药物管理。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Apr(201):1-951.
3
The impact of CPOE medication systems' design aspects on usability, workflow and medication orders: a systematic review.计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)用药系统的设计方面对可用性、工作流程和用药医嘱的影响:一项系统评价
Methods Inf Med. 2010;49(1):3-19. doi: 10.3414/ME0630. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
4
Specifications of Computerized Provider Order Entry and Clinical Decision Support Systems for Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review.计算机化医嘱录入和临床决策支持系统在癌症化疗患者中的应用规范:系统评价。
Chemotherapy. 2018;63(3):162-171. doi: 10.1159/000489503. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
5
Computerized Physician Order Entry in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Narrative Review.计算机化医嘱录入在新生儿重症监护病房的应用:叙述性综述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):487-494. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692475. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
6
A systematic review of data elements of computerized physician order entry (CPOE): mapping the data to FHIR.计算机化医师医嘱录入(CPOE)数据元素的系统评价:将数据映射到 FHIR
Inform Health Soc Care. 2023 Oct 2;48(4):402-419. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2023.2255285. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
7
Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings: a systematic review.减少成人医疗和外科环境中用药错误的干预措施:一项系统综述。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Nov 12;11:2042098620968309. doi: 10.1177/2042098620968309. eCollection 2020.
8
The impact of computerized physician medication order entry in hospitalized patients--a systematic review.计算机化医生医嘱录入对住院患者的影响——一项系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Jun;77(6):365-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.001. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
9
Perceptions and experiences of the implementation, management, use and optimisation of electronic prescribing systems in hospital settings: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies.医院环境中电子处方系统实施、管理、使用及优化的认知与经验:定性研究的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 8;6(7):e011858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011858.
10
A systematic review of the effectiveness of interruptive medication prescribing alerts in hospital CPOE systems to change prescriber behavior and improve patient safety.对医院计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)系统中干预性用药处方提醒改变开处方者行为并提高患者安全有效性的系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a Nationwide Medication History Sharing Program on the Care Process and End-User Experience in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital: Cohort Study and Cross-Sectional Study.全国用药史共享计划对一家三级教学医院护理流程及终端用户体验的影响:队列研究与横断面研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Mar 20;12:e53079. doi: 10.2196/53079.
2
Graphical User Interface Development for a Hospital-Based Predictive Risk Tool: Protocol for a Co-Design Study.基于医院的预测风险工具的图形用户界面开发:一项协同设计研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 31;12:e47717. doi: 10.2196/47717.
3
Digital interventions for genomics and genetics education, empowerment, and service engagement: A systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences and satisfaction of children, young people and their parents with alternative mental health models to inpatient settings: a systematic review.替代住院环境的精神卫生模式的儿童、青少年及其父母的体验和满意度:系统评价。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;29(12):1621-1633. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01420-7. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
2
Prescriber perceptions of medication-related computerized decision support systems in hospitals: A synthesis of qualitative research.医疗机构中药物相关计算机化决策支持系统的处方医师认知:定性研究综合分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Sep;129:285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.024. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
3
用于基因组学和遗传学教育、赋权及服务参与的数字干预措施:一项系统综述。
J Community Genet. 2023 Jun;14(3):227-240. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00648-w. Epub 2023 May 18.
4
Understanding how physician perceptions of job demand and process benefits evolve during CPOE implementation.了解在实施计算机化医师医嘱录入(CPOE)过程中,医生对工作需求和流程效益的认知是如何演变的。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2022 Aug 29;12(1):98-122. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2022.2113343. eCollection 2023.
5
eHealth: A Survey of Architectures, Developments in mHealth, Security Concerns and Solutions.电子健康:移动健康的架构调查、发展、安全问题和解决方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 11;19(20):13071. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013071.
6
A randomized controlled trial for evaluating the impact of integrating a computerized clinical decision support system and a socially assistive humanoid robot into grand rounds during pre/post-operative care.一项随机对照试验,用于评估在术前/术后护理期间将计算机化临床决策支持系统和社交辅助人形机器人整合到教学查房中的影响。
Digit Health. 2022 Sep 25;8:20552076221129068. doi: 10.1177/20552076221129068. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
Digital interventions for antimicrobial prescribing and monitoring: a qualitative meta-synthesis of factors influencing user acceptance.数字干预措施对抗菌药物处方和监测:影响用户接受度的因素的定性元分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Sep 12;29(10):1786-1796. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac125.
8
Medication Errors and Patient Safety: Evaluation of Physicians' Responses to Medication-Related Alert Overrides in Clinical Decision Support Systems.用药错误与患者安全:临床决策支持系统中医生对用药相关警报覆盖的反应评估
Acta Inform Med. 2021 Dec;29(4):248-252. doi: 10.5455/aim.2021.29.248-252.
9
How, for Whom, and in Which Contexts or Conditions Augmented and Virtual Reality Training Works in Upskilling Health Care Workers: Realist Synthesis.增强现实和虚拟现实培训如何、为谁以及在何种背景或条件下对医护人员进行技能提升:实在论综合分析
JMIR Serious Games. 2022 Feb 14;10(1):e31644. doi: 10.2196/31644.
How do stakeholders experience the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in hospitals? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.
利益相关者如何体验医院电子处方系统的采用?定性研究的系统评价和主题综合分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Dec;28(12):1021-1031. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009082. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
4
User acceptance factors of hospital information systems and related technologies: Systematic review.医院信息系统及相关技术的用户接受因素:系统评价
Inform Health Soc Care. 2018 Dec;43(4):401-426. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2017.1353999. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
5
Validation of the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model.德洛内和麦克林信息系统成功模型的验证
Healthc Inform Res. 2017 Jan;23(1):60-66. doi: 10.4258/hir.2017.23.1.60. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
6
Evaluation of Electronic Prescribing Decision Support System at a Tertiary Care Pediatric Hospital: The User Acceptance Perspective.三级护理儿童医院电子处方决策支持系统的评估:用户接受度视角
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:256-261.
7
Dissemination and Adoption of Comparative Effectiveness Research Findings When Findings Challenge Current Practices.当研究结果挑战当前实践时比较效果研究结果的传播与采用
Rand Health Q. 2013 Feb 28;2(4):5. eCollection 2013 Winter.
8
How Physician Perspectives on E-Prescribing Evolve over Time. A Case Study Following the Transition between EHRs in an Outpatient Clinic.医生对电子处方的看法如何随时间演变。一项关于门诊诊所电子健康记录转换后的案例研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Oct 26;7(4):994-1006. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-04-RA-0069.
9
Evaluation of hospital-wide computerised decision support in an intensive care unit: an observational study.重症监护病房全院范围计算机化决策支持的评估:一项观察性研究。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016 Jul;44(4):507-12. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1604400403.
10
The evolution of the market for commercial computerized physician order entry and computerized decision support systems for prescribing.用于开处方的商业计算机化医师医嘱录入和计算机化决策支持系统的市场演变。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):349-55. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv095. Epub 2015 Sep 2.