• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重肢体损伤后的动脉重建:损伤严重程度评分系统无法预测肢体挽救情况。

Arterial reconstruction after mangled extremity: injury severity scoring systems are not predictive of limb salvage.

作者信息

Elsharawy Mohamed Amin

机构信息

Surgical Department, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

出版信息

Vascular. 2005 Mar-Apr;13(2):114-9. doi: 10.1258/rsmvasc.13.2.114.

DOI:10.1258/rsmvasc.13.2.114
PMID:15996366
Abstract

The Vascular Unit at Suez Canal University Hospital in Egypt covers a wide area with high rates of severe injuries. This is a prospective study of mangled extremities to identify risk factors associated with limb loss in these patients. Between December 2000 and August 2003, a prospective study on all patients with arterial injuries in mangled extremities was undertaken. All patients were scored using the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) and the Mangled Extremity Severity Index (MESI). During this period, arterial reconstruction was performed in 62 patients. Primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage rates were 81%, 85.5%, and 93.5%, respectively. The only factor affecting limb salvage (statistical trend) was the site of trauma (upper limb 100% vs lower limb 89%; p = .08%). There was no significant effect related to the mechanism of trauma (blunt 90% vs stab 100%; p = .125), MESS (< 7, 100% vs > 7, 91%; p = .22), and MESI (< 20, 100% vs > 20, 90.5%; p = .154). Upper limb injuries were the least likely to lead to amputation. We recommend that all injuries, whatever their score, should be surgically explored before treatment decisions are made.

摘要

埃及苏伊士运河大学医院的血管科负责的区域范围广,重伤发生率高。这是一项关于严重毁损肢体的前瞻性研究,旨在确定这些患者肢体缺失的相关危险因素。2000年12月至2003年8月,对所有严重毁损肢体的动脉损伤患者进行了前瞻性研究。所有患者均使用肢体损伤严重程度评分(MESS)和肢体损伤严重指数(MESI)进行评分。在此期间,对62例患者进行了动脉重建。一期通畅率、二期通畅率和肢体挽救率分别为81%、85.5%和93.5%。影响肢体挽救(统计学趋势)的唯一因素是创伤部位(上肢100%,下肢89%;p = 0.08%)。创伤机制(钝性伤90%,刺伤100%;p = 0.125)、MESS(<7分,100%,>7分,91%;p = 0.22)和MESI(<20分,100%,>20分,90.5%;p = 0.154)均无显著影响。上肢损伤导致截肢的可能性最小。我们建议,在做出治疗决策之前,应对所有损伤进行手术探查,无论其评分如何。

相似文献

1
Arterial reconstruction after mangled extremity: injury severity scoring systems are not predictive of limb salvage.严重肢体损伤后的动脉重建:损伤严重程度评分系统无法预测肢体挽救情况。
Vascular. 2005 Mar-Apr;13(2):114-9. doi: 10.1258/rsmvasc.13.2.114.
2
Outcome and utility of scoring systems in the management of the mangled extremity.严重肢体损伤管理中评分系统的结果与效用
Am J Surg. 1996 Nov;172(5):569-73; discussion 573-4. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00245-0.
3
Are We Justified Doing Salvage or Amputation Procedure Based on Mangled Extremity Severity Score in Mangled Upper Extremity Injury.对于上肢严重毁损伤,我们基于肢体毁损伤严重程度评分来进行挽救或截肢手术是否合理?
J Orthop Case Rep. 2017 Jan-Feb;7(1):3-8. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.662.
4
Utility of severity scoring systems for mangled upper limb salvage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.严重程度评分系统在挽救上肢毁损中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Injury. 2024 Apr;55(4):111447. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111447. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
5
The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) does not predict amputation in popliteal artery injury.Mangled 肢体严重程度评分(MESS)不能预测腘动脉损伤的截肢。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec;49(6):2363-2371. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02179-4. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
6
The timing of amputation of mangled lower extremities does not predict post-injury outcomes and mortality: A retrospective analysis from the ACS TQIP database.创伤性下肢毁损肢体的截肢时机并不预测伤后结局和死亡率:ACS TQIP 数据库的回顾性分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Sep 1;91(3):447-456. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003302.
7
The mangled extremity score and amputation: Time for a revision.严重肢体损伤评分与截肢:修订时机
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Mar;82(3):518-523. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001339.
8
Reliability of the mangled extremity severity score in combat-related upper and lower extremity injuries.肢体严重损伤严重程度评分在与战斗相关的上肢和下肢损伤中的可靠性。
Indian J Orthop. 2015 Nov-Dec;49(6):656-60. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.168759.
9
The futility of predictive scoring of mangled lower extremities.下肢严重毁损伤预测评分的无效性。
J Trauma. 1993 Jan;34(1):99-104. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199301000-00019.
10
Evaluation of Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) as a predictor of lower limb amputation in children with trauma.评估肢体毁损严重程度评分(MESS)作为创伤儿童下肢截肢预测指标的价值。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Dec;22(6):465-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1322541. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Limb Salvage Versus Amputation: A Review of Variables Influencing the Assessment and Decision-Making in Complex Limb Fracture Management.保肢与截肢:影响复杂肢体骨折治疗评估与决策的变量综述
Cureus. 2024 Nov 23;16(11):e74322. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74322. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Predictors of secondary amputation in patients with grade IIIC lower limb injuries: A retrospective analysis of 35 patients.III级下肢损伤患者二次截肢的预测因素:35例患者的回顾性分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(22):e7068. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007068.
3
Management of major limb injuries.
肢体严重损伤的处理
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Jan 5;2014:640430. doi: 10.1155/2014/640430. eCollection 2014.
4
Mangled lower extremity: can we trust the amputation scores?下肢严重毁损:我们能信赖截肢评分吗?
Int J Burns Trauma. 2012;2(1):51-8. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
5
Amputation of a lower extremity after severe trauma.严重创伤后下肢截肢
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2011 Oct;23(4):306-17. doi: 10.1007/s00064-011-0043-9.
6
Treatment principles in the management of open fractures.开放性骨折治疗原则
Indian J Orthop. 2008 Oct;42(4):377-86. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.43373.
7
Management of upper extremity vascular injury: outcome related to the Mangled Extremity Severity Score.上肢血管损伤的处理:与肢体毁损严重程度评分相关的结果
World J Surg. 2009 Apr;33(4):857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9902-4.