Suppr超能文献

严重肢体损伤管理中评分系统的结果与效用

Outcome and utility of scoring systems in the management of the mangled extremity.

作者信息

Durham R M, Mistry B M, Mazuski J E, Shapiro M, Jacobs D

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St. Louis University Medical Center, Missouri 63110-0250, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1996 Nov;172(5):569-73; discussion 573-4. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00245-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of scoring systems as predictors of amputation and functional outcome in severe blunt extremity trauma was examined.

METHODS

All severe extremity injuries treated over a 10-year period were scored retrospectively using four scoring systems: Mangled Extremity Syndrome Index (MESI), Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS), Predictive Salvage Index (PSI), and Limb Salvage Index (LSI).

RESULTS

Twenty-three upper (UE) and 51 lower extremity (LE) injuries were evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were MESI 100% and 50%, MESS 79% and 83%, PSI 96% and 50%, and LSI 83% and 83%. For each system, there were no differences between patients with good and poor functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

All of the scoring systems were able to identify the majority of patients who required amputation. However, prediction in individual patients was problematic. None of the scoring systems were able to predict functional outcome.

摘要

背景

研究了评分系统在严重钝性肢体创伤中作为截肢和功能结局预测指标的作用。

方法

回顾性地使用四种评分系统对10年间治疗的所有严重肢体损伤进行评分:肢体毁损综合征指数(MESI)、肢体毁损严重程度评分(MESS)、预测挽救指数(PSI)和肢体挽救指数(LSI)。

结果

评估了23例上肢(UE)和51例下肢(LE)损伤。敏感性和特异性分别为:MESI为100%和50%,MESS为79%和83%,PSI为96%和50%,LSI为83%和83%。对于每个系统,功能结局良好和不良的患者之间没有差异。

结论

所有评分系统都能够识别出大多数需要截肢的患者。然而,对个体患者的预测存在问题。没有一个评分系统能够预测功能结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验