• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢严重毁损伤预测评分的无效性。

The futility of predictive scoring of mangled lower extremities.

作者信息

Bonanni F, Rhodes M, Lucke J F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1993 Jan;34(1):99-104. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199301000-00019.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199301000-00019
PMID:8437205
Abstract

Fifty-eight lower limb salvage attempts over a 10-year period were retrospectively scored using the Mangled Extremity Syndrome Index (MESI), Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS), Predictive Salvage Index (PSI), and the Limb Salvage Index (LSI). Primary amputations were excluded. Limb salvage failure was defined at four levels, including functional failure 2 years postinjury. Cross-validational sensitivity and specificity analyses revealed no predictive utility in any of the four indices. Although most failed limb salvage attempts could be identified early in the course of management, a significant percentage of our patients suffered prolonged reconstructive efforts. We conclude that efforts must be directed at more precisely determining the factors that aid in the decisions to terminate futile salvage efforts.

摘要

在10年期间,对58例下肢保肢尝试进行回顾性评分,采用肢体毁损综合征指数(MESI)、肢体毁损严重程度评分(MESS)、预测保肢指数(PSI)和保肢指数(LSI)。排除一期截肢病例。保肢失败定义为四个水平,包括伤后2年的功能失败。交叉验证敏感性和特异性分析显示,这四个指数均无预测效用。虽然大多数保肢失败尝试在治疗过程早期即可识别,但我们有相当比例的患者经历了长时间的重建努力。我们得出结论,必须致力于更精确地确定有助于决定终止徒劳保肢努力的因素。

相似文献

1
The futility of predictive scoring of mangled lower extremities.下肢严重毁损伤预测评分的无效性。
J Trauma. 1993 Jan;34(1):99-104. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199301000-00019.
2
Outcome and utility of scoring systems in the management of the mangled extremity.严重肢体损伤管理中评分系统的结果与效用
Am J Surg. 1996 Nov;172(5):569-73; discussion 573-4. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00245-0.
3
A prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of the lower-extremity injury-severity scores.下肢损伤严重程度评分临床效用的前瞻性评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Jan;83(1):3-14. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200101000-00002.
4
Arterial reconstruction after mangled extremity: injury severity scoring systems are not predictive of limb salvage.严重肢体损伤后的动脉重建:损伤严重程度评分系统无法预测肢体挽救情况。
Vascular. 2005 Mar-Apr;13(2):114-9. doi: 10.1258/rsmvasc.13.2.114.
5
Evaluation of Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) as a predictor of lower limb amputation in children with trauma.评估肢体毁损严重程度评分(MESS)作为创伤儿童下肢截肢预测指标的价值。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Dec;22(6):465-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1322541. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
6
Primary amputation vs limb salvage in mangled extremity: a systematic review of the current scoring system.严重毁损肢体的一期截肢与保肢治疗:当前评分系统的系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Dec 2;16:372. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0832-7.
7
The timing of amputation of mangled lower extremities does not predict post-injury outcomes and mortality: A retrospective analysis from the ACS TQIP database.创伤性下肢毁损肢体的截肢时机并不预测伤后结局和死亡率:ACS TQIP 数据库的回顾性分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Sep 1;91(3):447-456. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003302.
8
Critical evaluation of mangled extremity severity scoring system in Indian patients.对印度患者肢体严重损伤严重程度评分系统的批判性评估。
Injury. 2003 Jul;34(7):493-6. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00214-0.
9
The effect of systemic injury score on the decision making of mangled lower extremities.全身损伤评分对严重毁损下肢治疗决策的影响
Injury. 2016 Oct;47(10):2127-2130. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.05.023. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
10
Third degree open fractures and traumatic sub-/total amputations of the upper extremity: Outcome and relevance of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score.上肢三度开放性骨折及创伤性部分/完全截肢:肢体损伤严重程度评分的结果及相关性
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Oct;102(6):785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial surgical management of injuries to the lower extremities in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries - A systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.多发伤和/或重伤患者下肢损伤的初始外科治疗——系统评价与临床实践指南更新
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):3329-3350. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02662-0. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
Open tibial fractures: An overview.开放性胫骨骨折:概述
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jun 24;20:101483. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101483. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
A Leg to Stand on: Trauma Center Designation and Association with Rate of Limb Salvage in Patients Suffering Severe Lower Extremity Injury.
有腿可撑:创伤中心指定与严重下肢损伤患者保肢率的关联。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jul;233(1):120-129.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
SOFT-TISSUE INJURY TO THE FOOT AND ANKLE: LITERATURE REVIEW AND STAGED MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL.足踝部软组织损伤:文献综述与分期管理方案
Acta Ortop Bras. 2019 Jul-Aug;27(4):223-229. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220192704221240.
5
Management of Post-Traumatic Composite Bone and Soft Tissue Defect of Leg.小腿创伤后复合性骨与软组织缺损的处理
Indian J Plast Surg. 2019 Jan;52(1):45-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688097. Epub 2019 May 8.
6
Long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation.严重创伤性截肢后上肢再植的长期预后
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 10;18(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1442-3.
7
[Limb salvage and amputation after trauma : Decision criteria and management algorithm].[创伤后肢体挽救与截肢:决策标准及处理流程]
Unfallchirurg. 2016 May;119(5):358-73. doi: 10.1007/s00113-016-0181-5.
8
Shank vessel injuries: the forgotten vascular injuries.小腿血管损伤:被遗忘的血管损伤。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012 Aug;38(4):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s00068-012-0196-8. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
9
Primary amputation vs limb salvage in mangled extremity: a systematic review of the current scoring system.严重毁损肢体的一期截肢与保肢治疗:当前评分系统的系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Dec 2;16:372. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0832-7.
10
Limb salvage surgery.保肢手术
Indian J Plast Surg. 2013 May;46(2):265-74. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.118603.