Slipman Curtis W, Plastaras Chris, Patel Rajeev, Isaac Zacharia, Chow David, Garvan Cynthia, Pauza Kevin, Furman Michael
The Penn Spine Center, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Musculoskeletal Program, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Ground Floor White Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Spine J. 2005 Jul-Aug;5(4):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.11.012.
In a small prospective study assessing 10 symptomatic and 10 asymptomatic subjects, Schellhas et al. compared cervical discography to magnetic resonance imaging. Within that study he reported on the distribution of pain for the C3-C4 to C6-C7 levels. Four years later, Grubb and Ellis reported retrospective data from his 12-year experience using cervical discography from C2-C3 to C7-T1 in 173 patients. To date, no large prospective study defining pain referral patterns for each cervical disc has been performed.
To conduct a prospective visual and statistical descriptive study of pain provocation of a cohort of subjects undergoing cervical discography.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective multicenter descriptive study.
Pain referral maps were generated for each disc level from patients undergoing cervical discography with at least two levels assessed. If concordant pain was reproduced in a morphologically abnormal disc, the subject immediately completed a pain diagram. An independent observer interviewed the subject and recorded the location of provoked symptoms. Visual data were compiled using a body sector bit map, which consisted of 48 clinically relevant body regions. Visual maps with graduated color codes and frequencies of symptom location at each cervical disc level were generated.
A total of 101 symptom provocation maps were recorded during cervical discography on 41 subjects. There were 10 at C2-C3, 19 at C3-C4, 27 at C4-C5, 27 at C5-C6, 16 at C6-C7 and 2 at C7-T1. Predominantly unilateral symptoms were provoked just as often as bilateral symptoms. The C2-C3 disc referred pain to the neck, subocciput and face. The C3-C4 disc referred pain to the neck, subocciput, trapezius, anterior neck, face, shoulder, interscapular and limb. The C4-C5 disc referred pain to the neck, shoulder, interscapular, trapezius, extremity, face, chest and subocciput. The C5-C6 disc referred pain to the neck, trapezius, interscapular, suboccipital, anterior neck, chest and face. The C6-C7 disc referred pain to the neck, interscapular, trapezius, shoulder, extremity and subocciput. At C7-T1 we produced neck and interscapular pain. Visual maps with graduated color codes and frequencies of symptom location at each cervical disc level were generated.
In conclusion, these results confirm the observations of prior investigators that cervical internal disc disruption can elicit axial and peripheral symptoms. The particular patterns of pain generation allow the discographer to preprocedurally anticipate disc levels to assess. With these data, the number of disc punctures that are required can be limited rather than routinely assessing all cervical discs.
在一项评估10名有症状和10名无症状受试者的小型前瞻性研究中,谢尔哈斯等人将颈椎间盘造影与磁共振成像进行了比较。在该研究中,他报告了C3 - C4至C6 - C7节段的疼痛分布情况。四年后,格鲁布和埃利斯报告了他在173例患者中使用从C2 - C3至C7 - T1的颈椎间盘造影的12年回顾性数据。迄今为止,尚未进行过大型前瞻性研究来确定每个颈椎间盘的疼痛放射模式。
对一组接受颈椎间盘造影的受试者的疼痛激发情况进行前瞻性视觉和统计描述性研究。
研究设计/地点:前瞻性多中心描述性研究。
为至少评估了两个节段的接受颈椎间盘造影的患者的每个椎间盘节段生成疼痛放射图。如果在形态异常的椎间盘中再现了一致性疼痛,受试者立即完成一份疼痛图。一名独立观察者对受试者进行访谈并记录激发症状的位置。使用由48个临床相关身体区域组成的身体扇形位图汇编视觉数据。生成了带有渐变颜色代码和每个颈椎间盘节段症状位置频率的视觉图。
在41名受试者的颈椎间盘造影过程中,共记录了101张症状激发图。C2 - C3节段有10张,C3 - C4节段有19张,C4 - C5节段有27张,C5 - C6节段有27张,C6 - C7节段有16张,C7 - T1节段有2张。主要为单侧症状的激发与双侧症状的激发频率相同。C2 - C3椎间盘将疼痛放射至颈部、枕下和面部。C3 - C4椎间盘将疼痛放射至颈部、枕下、斜方肌、颈部前方、面部、肩部、肩胛间和肢体。C4 - C5椎间盘将疼痛放射至颈部、肩部、肩胛间、斜方肌、肢体、面部、胸部和枕下。C5 - C6椎间盘将疼痛放射至颈部、斜方肌、肩胛间、枕下、颈部前方、胸部和面部。C6 - C7椎间盘将疼痛放射至颈部、肩胛间、斜方肌、肩部、肢体和枕下。在C7 - T1节段,我们引发了颈部和肩胛间疼痛。生成了带有渐变颜色代码和每个颈椎间盘节段症状位置频率的视觉图。
总之,这些结果证实了先前研究者的观察结果,即颈椎间盘内部破裂可引发轴向和周围症状。特定的疼痛产生模式使椎间盘造影者能够在操作前预测需要评估的椎间盘节段。有了这些数据,可以限制所需的椎间盘穿刺次数,而不是常规评估所有颈椎间盘。