Vale S
Departemanto de Investigación, Indesalud, Calle 14 por 49, Altos Hospital Manuel Campos, Colonia Centro, 24010, Campeche, Mexico.
Postgrad Med J. 2005 Jul;81(957):429-35. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.028977.
Fifty five years after the first finding relating mood disturbances and cardiovascular diseases, there is still debate on the formation of a cogent conception embracing all the fragments of insight within the various aspects relating psychosocial stress to cardiovascular diseases. The clinical comorbidity is empirically evident, but there are ambiguous research results limiting the value of the proposed pathophysiological mechanisms. Psychosocial stress represents here any event that relates psychological phenomena to the social environment and to the associated pathophysiological changes. Stress denotes the external or environmental factors to which people are exposed, as well as the behavioural or biological reaction to it (response that some authors call "distress"). Cardiovascular diseases will be considered here only when being the consequence of chronic inflammatory disease of arteries (atherosclerosis). The question is: are there pathophysiological reliable mechanisms relating psychosocial stress to the development of cardiovascular diseases?
在首次发现情绪障碍与心血管疾病之间的关联55年后,对于形成一个涵盖心理社会压力与心血管疾病相关各个方面的所有见解片段的有说服力概念,仍存在争议。临床共病现象在经验上是明显的,但存在模糊的研究结果,限制了所提出的病理生理机制的价值。这里的心理社会压力是指将心理现象与社会环境以及相关病理生理变化联系起来的任何事件。压力既指人们所面临的外部或环境因素,也指对其的行为或生物学反应(一些作者称之为“痛苦”的反应)。这里仅在心血管疾病是动脉慢性炎症性疾病(动脉粥样硬化)的后果时才予以考虑。问题是:是否存在将心理社会压力与心血管疾病发展相关联的可靠病理生理机制?