Argiris Athanassios
Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232, USA.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2005 May;3(3):393-403. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2005.0020.
Locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer remains a therapeutic challenge for multidisciplinary teams. Despite high objective response rates, induction chemotherapy has not resulted in tangible benefit in multiple randomized trials. In recent years, as most evidence solidified the role of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation as either primary or postoperative therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer, induction chemotherapy fell out of scope and practice. The failure of older randomized trials to show a survival benefit from induction chemotherapy can be attributed to several factors. It is possible that the predominance of locoregional failure did not allow any added benefit from better systemic control to translate into a survival advantage. Alternatively, seemingly active chemotherapy regimens may have been suboptimal. Nevertheless, recent developments have altered our perception of head and neck cancer and its treatment. Locoregional control has dramatically improved with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Of note is that none of the previously conducted randomized trials of induction chemotherapy used concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the control arm. Moreover, we witnessed the development of better combination regimens that improved efficacy in the induction setting. The previously standard cisplatin/5-fluoruracil (5-FU) combination is being replaced by the triple combination of taxane/ cisplatin/5-FU. Randomized trials showed that increased activity with the triplet regimen resulted in improved long-term disease control and survival. Finally, cetuximab, an active epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, is entering clinical practice and is expected to change the standard of therapy. With the emergence of more efficacious systemic therapies, the role of induction therapy warrants reevaluation. A number of randomized trials are planned or currently ongoing to investigate concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without induction. These trials are anticipated to redefine the role of induction chemotherapy for head and neck cancer.
局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌仍然是多学科团队面临的治疗挑战。尽管客观缓解率很高,但诱导化疗在多项随机试验中并未带来切实的益处。近年来,由于大多数证据巩固了同步放化疗作为局部晚期头颈部癌主要或术后治疗的作用,诱导化疗已不再适用。早期随机试验未能显示诱导化疗具有生存获益,这可能归因于几个因素。局部区域失败占主导地位可能使更好的全身控制所带来的任何额外益处无法转化为生存优势。或者,看似有效的化疗方案可能并不理想。然而,最近的进展改变了我们对头颈部癌及其治疗的认识。同步放化疗使局部区域控制得到了显著改善。值得注意的是,之前进行的诱导化疗随机试验中,没有一项在对照组中使用同步放化疗。此外,我们见证了更好的联合方案的发展,这些方案提高了诱导治疗的疗效。以前的标准顺铂/5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)联合方案正被紫杉烷/顺铂/5-FU三联方案所取代。随机试验表明,三联方案活性的提高导致长期疾病控制和生存率得到改善。最后,西妥昔单抗,一种有效的表皮生长因子受体抑制剂,正在进入临床实践,并有望改变治疗标准。随着更有效的全身治疗方法的出现,诱导治疗的作用值得重新评估。多项随机试验正在计划中或正在进行,以研究同步放化疗联合或不联合诱导治疗。这些试验预计将重新定义诱导化疗在头颈部癌治疗中的作用。