Jamurtas Athanasios Z, Theocharis V, Tofas T, Tsiokanos A, Yfanti C, Paschalis V, Koutedakis Y, Nosaka K
Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, Karies, Trikala, Greece.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Oct;95(2-3):179-85. doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-1345-0. Epub 2005 Jul 9.
Many exercise models have demonstrated associations between eccentric muscle actions and muscle damage. However, the magnitude of muscle damage varies among the models. It appears that responses to eccentric exercise are different between leg and arm muscles but this has not been systematically clarified. This study compared leg and arm eccentric exercises of the same relative intensity for indices of muscle damage. Eleven healthy untrained males [Age: 21.2 (1.0) years, Height: 179.4 (3.0) cm, Weight: 78.4 (3.1) kg] performed a sub-maximal eccentric exercise of the knee extensors (LEGS) and the elbow flexors (ARMS), separately. Both LEGS and ARMS consisted of six sets of 12 repetitions with an intensity corresponding to 75% of the predetermined maximal eccentric peak torque (EPT) of each muscle. Range of motion (ROM), delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), serum creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activities, myoglobin (Mb) concentration, and muscle strength [EPT and isometric peak torque (IPT)] were assessed before and 24, 48, 72, and 96 h following exercise. Significant (P < 0.05) changes in DOMS and ROM were observed up to 96 h after both exercise bouts, and the magnitude of the change was similar between LEGS and ARMS. Increases in CK and Mb were significantly (P < 0.05) larger after ARMS than LEGS at 72 and 96 h post-exercise. EPT and IPT were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than the baseline up to 96 h post-exercise for ARMS but were fully recovered by 96 h post-exercise for LEGS. Decreases in muscle strength were significantly (p < 0.05) larger following ARMS than LEGS at 48, 72, and 96 h post-exercise for EPT, and from 24 h to 96 h post-exercise for IPT. These results suggest that the magnitude of muscle damage is greater and the recovery of muscle function was slower after eccentric exercise of arm elbow flexors than the knee extensors.
许多运动模型已经证明离心性肌肉动作与肌肉损伤之间存在关联。然而,不同模型中肌肉损伤的程度有所不同。似乎腿部和手臂肌肉对离心运动的反应存在差异,但这一点尚未得到系统的阐明。本研究比较了相同相对强度的腿部和手臂离心运动对肌肉损伤指标的影响。11名健康的未经训练男性[年龄:21.2(1.0)岁,身高:179.4(3.0)厘米,体重:78.4(3.1)千克]分别进行了膝关节伸肌(腿部)和肘关节屈肌(手臂)的次最大离心运动。腿部和手臂运动均包括六组,每组12次重复,强度相当于各肌肉预定最大离心峰值扭矩(EPT)的75%。在运动前以及运动后24、48、72和96小时评估了运动范围(ROM)、延迟性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)、血清肌酸激酶(CK)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)活性、肌红蛋白(Mb)浓度以及肌肉力量[EPT和等长峰值扭矩(IPT)]。在两次运动后长达96小时均观察到DOMS和ROM有显著(P<0.05)变化,且腿部和手臂的变化幅度相似。运动后第72和96小时,手臂运动后CK和Mb的增加显著(P<0.05)大于腿部。运动后长达96小时,手臂的EPT和IPT显著(P<0.05)低于基线水平,但腿部在运动后96小时已完全恢复。运动后第48、72和96小时,手臂运动后EPT的肌肉力量下降显著(p<0.05)大于腿部,运动后24小时至96小时,手臂运动后IPT的肌肉力量下降显著(p<0.05)大于腿部。这些结果表明,与膝关节伸肌相比,肘关节屈肌进行离心运动后肌肉损伤程度更大,肌肉功能恢复更慢。