Torn Marieke, Bollen Ward L E M, van der Meer Felix J M, van der Wall Ernst E, Rosendaal Frits R
Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 11;165(13):1527-32. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.13.1527.
Oral anticoagulation in the elderly is a dilemma. Although many elderly patients have strict indications for treatment with coumarin derivatives, the tendency toward an increased bleeding risk with age is a matter of concern. We investigated the risk of hemorrhage and thromboembolism according to age in patients who were treated with oral anticoagulants in the routine setting of an anticoagulation clinic.
All patients of the Leiden Anticoagulation Clinic (Leiden, the Netherlands) who were treated because of mechanical heart valve prostheses (target, international normalized ratio [INR] of 3.5), atrial fibrillation (target, INR of 3.0), or after a myocardial infarction (target, INR of 3.0) between 1994 and 1998 were included in the study and grouped by age at the start of follow-up. We calculated incidence rates of major hemorrhage and thromboembolism per age group.
We included 4202 patients: 842 patients younger than 60 years; 1200 patients aged between 60 and 70 years; 1464 patients aged between 71 and 80 years; and 696 patients older than 80 years. The incidence rate of major hemorrhage rose gradually with age from 1.5 per 100 patient-years for patients younger than 60 years to 4.2 per 100 patient-years for patients older than 80 years, yielding a hazard ratio of 2.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-4.4). The incidence rate of major thromboembolism rose from 1.0 per 100 patient-years for patients younger than 60 years to 2.4 per 100 patient-years for patients older than 80 years (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.2).
The incidence of both bleeding and thromboembolic events increases sharply with advanced age. Because higher thromboembolic risk with age often makes it unfeasible to withhold oral anticoagulation from elderly patients, future studies should focus on ways to lower the bleeding risk.
老年患者的口服抗凝治疗是一个难题。尽管许多老年患者有使用香豆素衍生物治疗的严格指征,但随着年龄增长出血风险增加的趋势令人担忧。我们在抗凝门诊的常规环境中,调查了接受口服抗凝剂治疗的患者按年龄划分的出血和血栓栓塞风险。
纳入1994年至1998年间因机械心脏瓣膜置换术(目标国际标准化比值[INR]为3.5)、心房颤动(目标INR为3.0)或心肌梗死后(目标INR为3.0)而在荷兰莱顿抗凝门诊接受治疗的所有患者,并在随访开始时按年龄分组。我们计算了每个年龄组的大出血和血栓栓塞发生率。
我们纳入了4202例患者:842例年龄小于60岁;1200例年龄在60至70岁之间;1464例年龄在71至80岁之间;696例年龄大于80岁。大出血发生率随年龄逐渐上升,从年龄小于60岁患者的每100患者年1.5例升至年龄大于80岁患者的每100患者年4.2例,风险比为2.7(95%置信区间,1.7 - 4.4)。主要血栓栓塞发生率从年龄小于60岁患者的每100患者年1.0例升至年龄大于80岁患者的每100患者年2.4例(风险比,2.2;95%置信区间,1.2 - 4.2)。
出血和血栓栓塞事件的发生率均随年龄增长而急剧增加。由于随着年龄增长血栓栓塞风险较高,往往使老年患者停用口服抗凝药不可行,未来研究应聚焦于降低出血风险的方法。