• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格测试中的社会期望偏差:对宇航员选拔的影响。

Social desirability bias in personality testing: implications for astronaut selection.

作者信息

Sandal Gro M, Musson Dave, Helmreich Robert L, Gravdal Lene

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Astronaut. 2005 Jul-Oct;57(2-8):634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.03.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.03.011
PMID:16010763
Abstract

The assessment of personality is recognized by space agencies as an approach to identify candidates likely to perform optimally during spaceflights. In the use of personality scales for selection, the impact of social desirability (SD) has been cited as a concern. Study 1 addressed the impact of SD on responses to the Personality Characteristic Inventory(PCI) and NEO-FFI. This was achieved by contrasting scores from active astronauts (N=65) with scores of successful astronaut applicants (N=63), and between pilots applicants (N=1271) and pilot research subjects (N=120). Secondly, personality scores were correlated with scores on the Marlow Crown Social Desirability Scale among applicants to managerial positions (N=120). The results indicated that SD inflated scores on PCI scales assessing negative interpersonal characteristics, and impacted on four of five scales in NEO-FFI. Still, the effect sizes were small or moderate. Study 2 addressed performance implications of SD during an assessment of males applying to work as rescue personnel operations in the North Sea (N=22). The results showed that SD correlated negatively with cognitive test performance, and positively with discrepancy in performance ratings between self and two observers. In conclusion, caution is needed in interpreting personality scores in applicant populations. SD maybe a negative predictor for performance under stress.

摘要

太空机构认为,评估个性是识别在太空飞行中可能表现最佳的候选人的一种方法。在使用个性量表进行选拔时,社会期望(SD)的影响被视为一个问题。研究1探讨了SD对个性特征量表(PCI)和大五人格量表(NEO-FFI)回答的影响。这是通过对比现役宇航员(N = 65)的分数与成功的宇航员申请者(N = 63)的分数,以及飞行员申请者(N = 1271)和飞行员研究对象(N = 120)的分数来实现的。其次,将管理职位申请者(N = 120)的个性分数与马洛-克劳恩社会期望量表的分数进行了关联。结果表明,SD夸大了PCI量表上评估负面人际特征的分数,并影响了NEO-FFI五个量表中的四个。不过,效应量较小或适中。研究2探讨了在评估申请在北海从事救援人员行动工作的男性(N = 22)时,SD对绩效的影响。结果表明,SD与认知测试成绩呈负相关,与自我和两名观察者之间的绩效评级差异呈正相关。总之,在解释申请者群体的个性分数时需要谨慎。SD可能是压力下绩效的负面预测指标。

相似文献

1
Social desirability bias in personality testing: implications for astronaut selection.人格测试中的社会期望偏差:对宇航员选拔的影响。
Acta Astronaut. 2005 Jul-Oct;57(2-8):634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.03.011.
2
Personality characteristics and trait clusters in final stage astronaut selection.最终阶段宇航员选拔中的人格特征与特质集群
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Apr;75(4):342-9.
3
Psychometric Personality Differences Between Candidates in Astronaut Selection.
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2016;87(11):933-939. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4548.2016.
4
Psychological evaluation of European astronaut applications: results of the 1991 selection campaign.欧洲宇航员申请的心理评估:1991年选拔活动的结果
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):925-9.
5
Psychological predictors of astronaut effectiveness.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):910-5.
6
Predicting astronaut effectiveness: a multivariate approach.预测宇航员的工作效率:一种多变量方法。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):904-9.
7
The influence of item order on intentional response distortion in the assessment of high potentials: assessing pilot applicants.项目顺序对评估高潜力人才时故意反应失真的影响:评估试点申请人。
Int J Psychol. 2014 Apr;49(2):131-9. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12015. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
8
Results of the ESA study on psychological selection of astronaut candidates for Columbus Missions II: personality assessment.
Acta Astronaut. 1992 Jul;27:139-45. doi: 10.1016/0094-5765(92)90190-t.
9
Psychological evaluation of Japanese astronaut applicants.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):920-4.
10
Pilot personality and crew coordination: implications for training and selection.
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1991;1(1):25-44. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0101_3.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality differences between internal medicine and surgical residents in an Asian population.亚洲人群中内科住院医师和外科住院医师的个性差异。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 29;22(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03689-w.