• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在慢性足底筋膜炎的治疗中,不进行局部麻醉的重复低能量冲击波治疗比进行局部麻醉的重复低能量冲击波治疗更有效。

Repetitive low-energy shock wave application without local anesthesia is more efficient than repetitive low-energy shock wave application with local anesthesia in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis.

作者信息

Rompe Jan D, Meurer Andrea, Nafe Bernhard, Hofmann Alexander, Gerdesmeyer Ludger

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University School of Medicine, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz D-55101, Germany.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2005 Jul;23(4):931-41. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.09.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.orthres.2004.09.003
PMID:16023010
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether application of local anesthesia (LA) interferes with clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for chronic plantar fasciitis.

AIMS

To evaluate the effect of local anesthesia on the clinical outcome after repetitive low-energy ESWT for chronic plantar fasciitis.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with chronic plantar fasciitis were randomly assigned to receive either low-energy ESWT without LA, given weekly for three weeks (Group I, n=45; 3 x 2000 pulses, total energy flux density per shock 0.09 mJ/mm2) or identical ESWT with LA (Group II, n=41). Primary outcome measure was: Reduction of pain from baseline to month 3 post-treatment in a pain numeric rating scale [0-10 points] during first steps in the morning, evaluated by an independent blinded observer. Calculations were based on intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

No difference was found between the groups at baseline. At 3 months, the average pain score was 2.2+/-2.0 points for patients of Group I, and 4.1+/-1.5 points for patients of Group II. The mean between-group difference was 1.9 points (95% CI: [1.1-2.7 points]; P<.001). Significantly more patients of Group I achieved 50% reduction of pain compared to Group II (67% vs 29%, P<.001).

CONCLUSION

ESWT as applied should be done without LA in patients suffering from chronic heel pain. LA applied prior treatment reduced the efficiency of low-energy ESWT.

摘要

背景

局部麻醉(LA)的应用是否会干扰体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的临床疗效尚不清楚。

目的

评估局部麻醉对慢性足底筋膜炎重复低能量ESWT治疗后临床结局的影响。

方法

86例慢性足底筋膜炎患者被随机分配接受无局部麻醉的低能量ESWT,每周1次,共3周(I组,n = 45;3×2000脉冲,每次冲击波的总能量通量密度为0.09 mJ/mm2)或相同的局部麻醉下的ESWT(II组,n = 41)。主要结局指标为:由独立的盲法观察者评估,在早晨第一步行走时,从基线到治疗后3个月疼痛数字评分量表[0 - 10分]上疼痛的减轻程度。计算基于意向性分析。

结果

两组在基线时无差异。3个月时,I组患者的平均疼痛评分为2.2±2.0分,II组患者为4.1±1.5分。组间平均差异为1.9分(95%CI:[1.1 - 2.7分];P <.001)。与II组相比,I组中疼痛减轻50%的患者明显更多(67%对29%,P <.001)。

结论

对于患有慢性足跟痛的患者,应用ESWT时不应使用局部麻醉。治疗前应用局部麻醉会降低低能量ESWT的疗效。

相似文献

1
Repetitive low-energy shock wave application without local anesthesia is more efficient than repetitive low-energy shock wave application with local anesthesia in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis.在慢性足底筋膜炎的治疗中,不进行局部麻醉的重复低能量冲击波治疗比进行局部麻醉的重复低能量冲击波治疗更有效。
J Orthop Res. 2005 Jul;23(4):931-41. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.09.003.
2
[Influence of local anesthesia and energy level on the clinical outcome of extracorporeal shock wave-treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis].[局部麻醉和能量水平对慢性足底筋膜炎体外冲击波治疗临床结果的影响]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005 Mar-Apr;143(2):240-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832379.
3
High-energy Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Therapy (ESWT) for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis.高能体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗慢性足底筋膜炎。
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Sep;31(9):790-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0790.
4
Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: results of a confirmatory randomized placebo-controlled multicenter study.桡侧体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性顽固性足底筋膜炎安全有效:一项验证性随机安慰剂对照多中心研究结果
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Nov;36(11):2100-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546508324176. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
Radial shock wave treatment alone is less efficient than radial shock wave treatment combined with tissue-specific plantar fascia-stretching in patients with chronic plantar heel pain.单独使用径向冲击波治疗不如将其与针对特定组织的足底筋膜伸展相结合的治疗方法在慢性足跟痛患者中有效。
Int J Surg. 2015 Dec;24(Pt B):135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.082. Epub 2015 May 1.
6
Preliminary experience of a single session of low-energy extracorporeal shock wave treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis.单次低能量体外冲击波治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的初步经验
Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Feb;29(2):150-4. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0150.
7
Clinically relevant effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized, controlled multicenter study.聚焦式体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的临床相关疗效:一项随机对照多中心研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 6;97(9):701-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01331.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis. A double blind randomised controlled trial.体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎:一项双盲随机对照试验。
J Orthop Res. 2003 Sep;21(5):937-40. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00048-2.
9
Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Local Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis, a Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.体外冲击波疗法与局部注射皮质类固醇治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的单盲随机临床试验
Pain Med. 2016 Sep;17(9):1722-31. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw113. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
10
Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Without Local Anesthesia in Patients With Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.非局部麻醉下体外冲击波疗法治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎的有效性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug;96(8):529-534. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000666.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on nerve conduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波疗法对神经传导的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2024 Nov 22;15:1493692. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1493692. eCollection 2024.
2
High Versus Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: A Retrospective Study.高能量与低能量体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性外侧上髁炎:一项回顾性研究
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Sep 22;9(3):173. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9030173.
3
Comparing two protocols of shock wave therapy for patients with plantar fasciitis: A pilot study.
比较两种冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎患者的方案:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 6;19(5):e0302553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302553. eCollection 2024.
4
Radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT) for coccydynia: a prospective study of 14 patients.用于尾骨痛的桡侧体外冲击波疗法(rESWT):14例患者的前瞻性研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Aug 4;85(10):4656-4661. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001133. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
The effectiveness of shockwave therapy on patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, and plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.冲击波疗法治疗髌腱炎、跟腱炎和足底筋膜炎的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1193835. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1193835. eCollection 2023.
6
More than Ninety Percent of the Light Energy Emitted by Near-Infrared Laser Therapy Devices Used to Treat Musculoskeletal Disorders Is Absorbed within the First Ten Millimeters of Biological Tissue.用于治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的近红外激光治疗设备所发射的光能,超过90%在生物组织的前10毫米内被吸收。
Biomedicines. 2022 Dec 9;10(12):3204. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123204.
7
Long Term Effectiveness of ESWT in Plantar Fasciitis in Amateur Runners.体外冲击波疗法对业余跑步者足底筋膜炎的长期疗效
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 24;11(23):6926. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236926.
8
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Pain-Relieving Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: A Focus on Fascia Nociceptors.体外冲击波疗法止痛作用的分子机制:聚焦筋膜伤害感受器
Life (Basel). 2022 May 17;12(5):743. doi: 10.3390/life12050743.
9
Pain Management Optimisation by an Ultrasound-Guided Analgesic Technique in Outpatients with Plantar Fasciitis during High-Energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy.高能体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎门诊患者时,采用超声引导镇痛技术优化疼痛管理
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021 Oct;49(5):350-356. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2021.1465.
10
Efficacy and safety of treating chronic nonspecific low back pain with radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), rESWT combined with celecoxib and eperisone (C + E) or C + E alone: a prospective, randomized trial.经皮体外冲击波疗法(rESWT)、rESWT 联合塞来昔布和乙哌立松(C+E)或 C+E 单独治疗慢性非特异性腰痛的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性、随机试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 4;16(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02848-x.