• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桡侧体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性顽固性足底筋膜炎安全有效:一项验证性随机安慰剂对照多中心研究结果

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: results of a confirmatory randomized placebo-controlled multicenter study.

作者信息

Gerdesmeyer Ludger, Frey Carol, Vester Johannes, Maier Markus, Weil Lowell, Weil Lowell, Russlies Martin, Stienstra John, Scurran Barry, Fedder Keith, Diehl Peter, Lohrer Heinz, Henne Mark, Gollwitzer Hans

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Technical University Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2008 Nov;36(11):2100-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546508324176. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1177/0363546508324176
PMID:18832341
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is an effective treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis that can be administered to outpatients without anesthesia but has not yet been evaluated in controlled trials.

HYPOTHESIS

There is no difference in effectiveness between radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy and placebo in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Three interventions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (0.16 mJ/mm(2); 2000 impulses) compared with placebo were studied in 245 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. Primary endpoints were changes in visual analog scale composite score from baseline to 12 weeks' follow-up, overall success rates, and success rates of the single visual analog scale scores (heel pain at first steps in the morning, during daily activities, during standardized pressure force). Secondary endpoints were single changes in visual analog scale scores, success rates, Roles and Maudsley score, SF-36, and patients' and investigators' global judgment of effectiveness 12 weeks and 12 months after extracorporeal shock wave therapy.

RESULTS

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy proved significantly superior to placebo with a reduction of the visual analog scale composite score of 72.1% compared with 44.7% (P = .0220), and an overall success rate of 61.0% compared with 42.2% in the placebo group (P = .0020) at 12 weeks. Superiority was even more pronounced at 12 months, and all secondary outcome measures supported radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy to be significantly superior to placebo (P < .025, 1-sided). No relevant side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy significantly improves pain, function, and quality of life compared with placebo in patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis.

摘要

背景

放射状体外冲击波疗法是治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的一种有效方法,无需麻醉即可在门诊进行,但尚未在对照试验中得到评估。

假设

放射状体外冲击波疗法与安慰剂在治疗慢性足底筋膜炎方面的疗效没有差异。

研究设计

随机对照试验;证据等级,1级。

方法

在245例慢性足底筋膜炎患者中,研究了三种放射状体外冲击波疗法干预措施(0.16 mJ/mm(2);2000次脉冲)与安慰剂的对比。主要终点是从基线到12周随访时视觉模拟量表综合评分的变化、总体成功率以及单个视觉模拟量表评分(早晨第一步时的足跟疼痛、日常活动期间、标准化压力时)的成功率。次要终点是体外冲击波治疗后12周和12个月时视觉模拟量表评分的单个变化、成功率、罗尔斯和莫兹利评分、SF-36以及患者和研究者对疗效的整体判断。

结果

放射状体外冲击波疗法被证明明显优于安慰剂,12周时视觉模拟量表综合评分降低了72.1%,而安慰剂组为44.7%(P = 0.0220),总体成功率为61.0%,安慰剂组为42.2%(P = 0.0020)。在12个月时优势更加明显,所有次要结局指标均支持放射状体外冲击波疗法明显优于安慰剂(P < 0.025,单侧)。未观察到相关副作用。

结论

与安慰剂相比,放射状体外冲击波疗法能显著改善顽固性足底筋膜炎患者的疼痛、功能和生活质量。

相似文献

1
Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: results of a confirmatory randomized placebo-controlled multicenter study.桡侧体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性顽固性足底筋膜炎安全有效:一项验证性随机安慰剂对照多中心研究结果
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Nov;36(11):2100-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546508324176. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic painful heel syndrome: a prospective, double blind, randomized trial assessing the efficacy of a new electromagnetic shock wave device.体外冲击波治疗慢性足跟疼痛综合征:一项评估新型电磁冲击波装置疗效的前瞻性、双盲、随机试验。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;46(5):348-57. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2007.05.011.
3
Clinically relevant effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized, controlled multicenter study.聚焦式体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的临床相关疗效:一项随机对照多中心研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 6;97(9):701-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01331.
4
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic proximal plantar fasciitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter intervention trial.体外冲击波疗法与安慰剂治疗慢性足底腱膜炎近端:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、多中心干预试验的结果
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;45(4):196-210. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2006.04.007.
5
[Influence of local anesthesia and energy level on the clinical outcome of extracorporeal shock wave-treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis].[局部麻醉和能量水平对慢性足底筋膜炎体外冲击波治疗临床结果的影响]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005 Mar-Apr;143(2):240-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832379.
6
Intracorporeal pneumatic shock application for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized, double blind prospective clinical trial.体内气动冲击治疗慢性足底筋膜炎:一项随机、双盲前瞻性临床试验。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Apr;130(4):541-6. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0947-0. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
7
Comparison of radial versus focused extracorporeal shock waves in plantar fasciitis using functional measures.比较功能测量在足底筋膜炎中使用放射状与聚焦式体外冲击波治疗的效果。
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Jan;31(1):1-9. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0001.
8
Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) with a new-generation pneumatic device in the treatment of heel pain. A double blind randomised controlled trial.采用新一代气动装置的体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗足跟痛:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2008 Feb;74(1):98-101.
9
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial evaluating the treatment of plantar fasciitis with an extracoporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) device: a North American confirmatory study.一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验,评估使用体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)设备治疗足底筋膜炎:一项北美验证性研究。
J Orthop Res. 2006 Feb;24(2):115-23. doi: 10.1002/jor.20008.
10
Thinner plantar fascia predicts decreased pain after extracorporeal shock wave therapy.足底筋膜较薄预示着体外冲击波治疗后疼痛减轻。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Jul;460:219-25. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31804ffd19.

引用本文的文献

1
Radial ESWT combined with a specific rehabilitation program (rESWT+RP) is more effective than sham rESWT+RP for acute hamstring muscle complex injury type 3b: a randomized, controlled trial.对于3b型急性腘绳肌复合体损伤,径向体外冲击波疗法联合特定康复方案(rESWT+RP)比假体外冲击波疗法联合康复方案更有效:一项随机对照试验。
Br Med Bull. 2025 Sep 1;155(1). doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldaf009.
2
Low-energy shock waves improve the bacterial detection of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on polyethylene.低能量冲击波可改善对聚乙烯上金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的细菌检测。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 26;15(1):31375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16834-4.
3
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of calcaneal spur-related symptoms: clinical outcomes and functional improvement.
体外冲击波疗法与高强度激光疗法治疗跟骨骨刺相关症状的比较:临床结果与功能改善
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 19;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05812-1.
4
Quantitative Spatial Analysis on Radiographic Features of Rotator Cuff Calcifications: An Exploratory Study.肩袖钙化影像学特征的定量空间分析:一项探索性研究。
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 21;13(3):551. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030551.
5
Using Radial Shock Wave Therapy to Control Cerebral Palsy-Related Dysfunctions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.使用径向冲击波疗法控制脑瘫相关功能障碍:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Gen Med. 2025 Mar 12;18:1439-1450. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S510383. eCollection 2025.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Acupuncture Versus Non-surgical Modalities for Treating Plantar Fasciitis: A Network Meta-Analysis.针刺疗法与非手术疗法治疗足底筋膜炎的比较效果:一项网状Meta分析
Cureus. 2024 Sep 8;16(9):e68959. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68959. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Is radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), sham-rESWT or a standardised exercise programme in combination with advice plus customised foot orthoses more effective than advice plus customised foot orthoses alone in the treatment of plantar fasciopathy? A double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial.体外冲击波治疗(rESWT)、假体外冲击波治疗( sham-rESWT)或标准化运动方案联合支具与单纯支具治疗足底筋膜炎哪个更有效?一项双盲、随机、 sham 对照试验。
Br J Sports Med. 2024 Jul 31;58(16):910-918. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108139.
8
Comparison of High-intensity Laser Therapy with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Plantar Fasciitis: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.高强度激光治疗与体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效比较:一项双盲随机临床试验。
Iran J Med Sci. 2024 Mar 1;49(3):147-155. doi: 10.30476/IJMS.2023.98042.2991. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Evaluation of the efficacy of trigger points combined with extracorporeal shock waves in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: heel temperature and plantar pressure.评估触发点联合体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效:足跟温度与足底压力
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Mar 2;25(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07296-2.
10
Effects of local vibration combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial.局部振动联合体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Oct 23;55:jrm12405. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.12405.