Cipolotti Lisa, Bird Chris, Good Tina, Macmanus David, Rudge Peter, Shallice Tim
Department of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(3):489-506. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.014. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
In the amnesia literature, disagreement exists over whether anterograde amnesia involves recollective-based recognition processes and/or familiarity-based ones depending on whether the anatomical damage is restricted to the hippocampus or also involves adjacent areas, particularly the entorhinal and perirhinal cortices. So far, few patients with well documented anatomical lesions and detailed assessment of recollective and recognition performance have been described. We report a comprehensive neuroanatomical assessment and detailed investigation of the anterograde memory functions of a previously described severe amnesic patient (VC). The results of four previously published neuroradiological investigations (resting PET, qualitative MRIs, volumetric MRI and functional MRI) together with the results of two new investigations (voxel-based morphometry and magnetic resonance spectroscopy) are presented. The consistent finding across these different qualitative and quantitative examinations of VC's brain has shown that there is primarily structural and functional abnormality located selectively in the hippocampus bilaterally. Marked impairments in both verbal and non-verbal recall and recognition standardized memory tests were documented in the context of VC's intact cognitive profile and normal semantic memory. The results of five new experimental recognition memory tests tapping recollection and familiarity using verbal, topographical (buildings and landscapes) and unknown human faces memoranda revealed striking differential effects according to the type of stimuli used. A receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that VC's recollective- and familiarity-based recognition processes were well preserved for unknown human faces. In contrast, recollective-based recognition for verbal and topographical material was at floor. Familiarity-based recognition was also impaired, significantly below controls for verbal and buildings memoranda and quite weak, although not reaching significance, for landscapes. These data suggest that the hippocampus is involved in recollective processes of verbal and topographical stimuli. It also plays an appreciable role in familiarity processes for these stimuli. However, recollection and familiarity of human faces appear not to depend on this region.
在失忆症文献中,对于顺行性失忆是否涉及基于回忆的识别过程和/或基于熟悉感的过程存在分歧,这取决于解剖损伤是否仅限于海马体,还是也涉及相邻区域,特别是内嗅皮质和鼻周皮质。到目前为止,很少有记录详细解剖病变以及对回忆和识别表现进行详细评估的患者被描述。我们报告了对一名先前描述的严重失忆患者(VC)进行的全面神经解剖学评估和对其顺行性记忆功能的详细研究。呈现了四项先前发表的神经放射学研究(静息态PET、定性MRI、容积MRI和功能MRI)的结果以及两项新研究(基于体素的形态测量和磁共振波谱)的结果。对VC大脑进行的这些不同定性和定量检查的一致发现表明,主要的结构和功能异常选择性地位于双侧海马体。在VC完整的认知概况和正常语义记忆的背景下,记录了言语和非言语回忆及识别标准化记忆测试中的明显损伤。五项新的实验性识别记忆测试的结果,这些测试使用言语、地形(建筑物和风景)和不认识的人脸记忆材料来探究回忆和熟悉感,结果显示根据所使用的刺激类型存在显著的差异效应。一项接受者操作特征分析表明,VC基于回忆和熟悉感的识别过程对于不认识的人脸保存完好。相比之下,基于回忆的对言语和地形材料的识别处于最低水平。基于熟悉感的识别也受损,对于言语和建筑物记忆材料显著低于对照组,对于风景材料虽然未达到显著水平但也相当弱。这些数据表明海马体参与了言语和地形刺激的回忆过程。它在这些刺激的熟悉感过程中也发挥了相当大的作用。然而,人脸的回忆和熟悉感似乎不依赖于这个区域。