Casillas Sergio, Delaney Conor P
Department of Colorectal Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Dig Surg. 2005;22(3):135-42. doi: 10.1159/000087130. Epub 2005 Jul 20.
Laparoscopic surgery has recently been gaining acceptance as an alternative approach for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. There is increasing evidence demonstrating the multiple potential benefits of laparoscopy including faster recovery, reduced costs, and lower morbidity. For patients with acute colitis, a laparoscopic subtotal colectomy and end ileostomy have been shown to be feasible and safe in experienced hands. When indicated, many of these patients may be able to safely undergo a subsequent laparoscopic approach for construction of an ileo-anal pouch. Although still controversial, an elective laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileo-anal pouch anastomosis has also been shown to be feasible with functional outcomes at least similar to those obtained with an open approach. However, larger randomized series of patients are needed with longer follow-up in order to draw definite conclusions. For Crohn's disease, a laparoscopic approach is ideal for stoma creation. In addition, laparoscopic ileo-colectomy is arguably the preferred approach for patients with terminal ileal disease. Some experienced laparoscopic groups have also applied laparoscopic techniques for more complicated cases with recurrent disease or disease-related complications, such as fistulous disease. Other short-term benefits of a laparoscopic approach may include a decreased incidence of ventral hernias, decreased incidence of small bowel obstruction, and faster recovery. These benefits may also have significant economic impact. In contrast to earlier reports, there is reliable evidence that conversion is not associated with a poorer outcome. A policy of starting most suitable cases laparoscopically may offer patients the potential benefits of a laparoscopic approach without increasing morbidity.
腹腔镜手术最近已逐渐被接受为炎性肠病患者的一种替代治疗方法。越来越多的证据表明腹腔镜手术具有多种潜在益处,包括恢复更快、成本降低和发病率更低。对于急性结肠炎患者,在经验丰富的医生手中,腹腔镜次全结肠切除术和末端回肠造口术已被证明是可行且安全的。在有指征时,许多这类患者可能能够安全地接受后续的腹腔镜手术来构建回肠肛管袋。尽管仍存在争议,但选择性腹腔镜保留直肠全结肠切除术并回肠肛管吻合术也已被证明是可行的,其功能结果至少与开放手术相似。然而,需要更大规模的随机患者系列研究并进行更长时间的随访,以便得出明确结论。对于克罗恩病,腹腔镜手术是造口创建的理想方法。此外,腹腔镜回肠结肠切除术可以说是末端回肠疾病患者的首选方法。一些经验丰富的腹腔镜手术团队也已将腹腔镜技术应用于更复杂的复发性疾病或疾病相关并发症(如瘘管病)的病例。腹腔镜手术的其他短期益处可能包括腹疝发生率降低、小肠梗阻发生率降低以及恢复更快。这些益处也可能产生重大的经济影响。与早期报告不同,有可靠证据表明中转开腹与较差的结果无关。对大多数合适病例首先采用腹腔镜手术的策略可能会为患者带来腹腔镜手术的潜在益处,而不会增加发病率。