• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿莫西林/舒巴坦治疗儿童复杂性社区获得性肺炎

Treatment of childhood complicated community-acquired pneumonia with amoxicillin/sulbactam.

作者信息

Lovera D, Arbo A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Mexico.

出版信息

J Chemother. 2005 Jun;17(3):283-8. doi: 10.1179/joc.2005.17.3.283.

DOI:10.1179/joc.2005.17.3.283
PMID:16038522
Abstract

The clinical and microbiological efficacy, as well as the tolerability of the amoxicillin/sulbactam combination as empiric treatment for complicated community-acquired pneumonia (CCAP) were evaluated in children from 3 months to 15 years with CCAP who were randomized 1:1 to receive either amoxicillin/sulbactam or cefuroxime. Of 234 patients hospitalized with CCAP in the study period (June, 1999-April, 2002), 62 patients qualified for the study: 32 received amoxicillin/sulbactam and 30 cefuroxime. Two were excluded. Demographic and clinical data showed that both groups were comparable at entry. One etiologic agent was identified in 55% of the patients, with Streptococcus pneumoniae being the most frequent. After treatment, the days of fever, duration of intravenous treatment, and hospitalization stay were similar in both groups. Overall favorable clinical responses were comparable: 97% for amoxicillin/sulbactam vs 100% for the comparative therapy. There was good tolerance to both drugs. Amoxicillin/sulbactam produced a satisfactory therapeutic outcome similar to that of cefuroxime for treatment of CCAP, and may be an appropriate choice for the treatment of this serious pediatric infection.

摘要

对3个月至15岁患有复杂性社区获得性肺炎(CCAP)的儿童,评估了阿莫西林/舒巴坦联合用药作为CCAP经验性治疗的临床和微生物学疗效以及耐受性,这些儿童按1:1随机分组,分别接受阿莫西林/舒巴坦或头孢呋辛治疗。在研究期间(1999年6月至2002年4月)因CCAP住院的234例患者中,62例符合研究条件:32例接受阿莫西林/舒巴坦治疗,30例接受头孢呋辛治疗。2例被排除。人口统计学和临床数据显示两组在入组时具有可比性。55%的患者鉴定出一种病原体,其中肺炎链球菌最为常见。治疗后,两组的发热天数、静脉治疗持续时间和住院时间相似。总体良好临床反应相当:阿莫西林/舒巴坦组为97%,对照治疗组为100%。两种药物耐受性良好。阿莫西林/舒巴坦治疗CCAP产生了与头孢呋辛相似的满意治疗效果,可能是治疗这种严重儿科感染的合适选择。

相似文献

1
Treatment of childhood complicated community-acquired pneumonia with amoxicillin/sulbactam.阿莫西林/舒巴坦治疗儿童复杂性社区获得性肺炎
J Chemother. 2005 Jun;17(3):283-8. doi: 10.1179/joc.2005.17.3.283.
2
Comparative efficacy of amoxicillin, cefuroxime and clarithromycin in the treatment of community -acquired pneumonia in children.阿莫西林、头孢呋辛和克拉霉素治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003 Dec;13(12):704-7.
3
Randomized, multicentre, comparative clinical evaluation of cefuroxime-sulbactam versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid therapy in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.
J Int Med Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;36(6):1293-304. doi: 10.1177/147323000803600617.
4
Management of community-acquired pneumonia in the era of pneumococcal resistance: a report from the Drug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Therapeutic Working Group.肺炎球菌耐药时代社区获得性肺炎的管理:肺炎链球菌耐药治疗工作组的报告
Arch Intern Med. 2000 May 22;160(10):1399-408. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.10.1399.
5
Cefuroxime compared to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.头孢呋辛与阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较。
Singapore Med J. 1996 Jun;37(3):255-7.
6
Comparative randomized trial of azithromycin versus erythromycin and amoxicillin for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in children.阿奇霉素与红霉素及阿莫西林治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的比较随机试验
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003 Feb;35(2):91-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10180.
7
Oral gemifloxacin versus sequential therapy with intravenous ceftriaxone/oral cefuroxime with or without a macrolide in the treatment of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, open-label, multicenter study of clinical efficacy and tolerability.口服吉米沙星与静脉注射头孢曲松/口服头孢呋辛序贯治疗(联合或不联合大环内酯类药物)在社区获得性肺炎住院患者治疗中的应用:一项关于临床疗效和耐受性的随机、开放标签、多中心研究
Clin Ther. 2002 Nov;24(11):1915-36. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80088-1.
8
Amoxicillin-sulbactam versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for the treatment of non-recurrent-acute otitis media in Argentinean children.阿莫西林-舒巴坦与阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗阿根廷儿童非复发性急性中耳炎的疗效比较
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Sep;69(9):1225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.016.
9
Impact of antibiotic de-escalation on clinical outcomes in community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia.抗生素降阶梯疗法对社区获得性肺炎球菌肺炎临床结局的影响
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Feb;72(2):547-553. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw441. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
10
Efficacy of amoxicillin-sulbactam, given twice-a-day, for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a clinical trial based on a pharmacodynamic model.一日两次给药的阿莫西林-舒巴坦治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效:一项基于药效学模型的临床试验
J Chemother. 2002 Dec;14(6):591-6. doi: 10.1179/joc.2002.14.6.591.

引用本文的文献

1
Probiotic improves efficacy of amoxicillin-sulbactam against childhood fast breathing pneumonia in a randomized placebo-controlled double blind clinical study.在一项随机、安慰剂对照双盲临床研究中,益生菌可提高阿莫西林-舒巴坦治疗儿童快速呼吸性肺炎的疗效。
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2018 Nov;63(3):233-237. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.17-117. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
2
Identification of bacterial pathogens in pediatric community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection using a simplified procedure of sputum sampling and examination: comparison between hospitalized children with and without underlying diseases.采用简化的痰标本采集和检查方法鉴定小儿社区获得性下呼吸道感染的细菌病原体:合并基础疾病与无基础疾病住院患儿的比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 May;29(5):519-25. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-0889-z. Epub 2010 Feb 24.