• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于研究参与和知情同意的跨文化视角。

Cross-cultural perspectives on research participation and informed consent.

作者信息

Barata Paula C, Gucciardi Enza, Ahmad Farah, Stewart Donna E

机构信息

Women's Health Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont., Canada.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jan;62(2):479-90. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.012. Epub 2005 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.012
PMID:16039028
Abstract

This study examined Portuguese Canadian and Caribbean Canadian immigrants' perceptions of health research and informed consent procedures. Six focus groups (three in each cultural group) involving 42 participants and two individual interviews were conducted. The focus groups began with a general question about health research. This was followed by three short role-plays between the moderator and the assistant. The role-plays involved a fictional health research study in which a patient is approached for recruitment, is read a consent form, and is asked to sign. The role-plays stopped at key moments at which time focus group participants were asked questions about their understanding and their perceptions. Focus group transcripts were coded in QSR NUDIST software using open coding and then compared across cultural groups. Six overriding themes emerged: two were common in both the Portuguese and Caribbean transcripts, one emphasized the importance of trust and mistrust, and the other highlighted the need and desire for more information about health research. However, these themes were expressed somewhat differently in the two groups. In addition, there were four overriding themes that were specific to only one cultural group. In the Portuguese groups, there was an overwhelming positive regard for the research process and an emphasis on verbal as opposed to written information. The Caribbean participants qualified their participation in research studies and repeatedly raised images of invasive research.

摘要

本研究考察了葡萄牙裔加拿大移民和加勒比裔加拿大移民对健康研究及知情同意程序的看法。研究开展了六个焦点小组(每个文化群体三个),共有42名参与者,并进行了两次个人访谈。焦点小组以一个关于健康研究的一般性问题开场。随后,主持人与助手进行了三场短剧表演。这些短剧围绕一项虚构的健康研究展开,内容包括向一名患者进行招募、为其宣读同意书并请其签字。短剧在关键时刻暂停,此时会向焦点小组参与者询问他们的理解和看法。焦点小组的文字记录在QSR NUDIST软件中采用开放式编码进行编码,然后在不同文化群体间进行比较。出现了六个首要主题:其中两个在葡萄牙裔和加勒比裔的文字记录中都很常见,一个强调信任与不信任的重要性,另一个突出了对更多健康研究信息的需求和渴望。然而,这两个主题在两个群体中的表达方式略有不同。此外,还有四个首要主题仅特定于一个文化群体。在葡萄牙裔群体中,对研究过程有着压倒性的积极看法,并强调口头而非书面信息。加勒比裔参与者对参与研究持保留态度,并反复提及侵入性研究的画面。

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural perspectives on research participation and informed consent.关于研究参与和知情同意的跨文化视角。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jan;62(2):479-90. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.012. Epub 2005 Jul 20.
2
Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research.美国研究人员对国际合作研究中知情同意的看法。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Sep;61(6):1211-22. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.004. Epub 2005 Apr 9.
3
Patients' consent preferences regarding the use of their health information for research purposes: a qualitative study.患者对于将其健康信息用于研究目的的同意偏好:一项定性研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Jan;9(1):22-7. doi: 10.1258/135581904322716076.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
Informed consent and collaborative research: perspectives from the developing world.知情同意与合作研究:来自发展中世界的观点
Dev World Bioeth. 2006 Mar;6(1):33-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00134.x.
6
Impact of detailed informed consent on research subjects' participation: a prospective, randomized trial.详细知情同意对研究对象参与度的影响:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Emerg Med. 2008 Apr;34(3):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.06.026. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
7
Informed consent: views from Karachi.知情同意:来自卡拉奇的观点
East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12 Suppl 1:S50-5.
8
Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.理解癌症临床试验参与者参与研究的决策:与知情同意、患者满意度和决策后悔相关的因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
9
Human tissue samples for research. A focus group study in adults and teenagers in Flanders.用于研究的人体组织样本。比利时弗拉芒地区成年人和青少年的焦点小组研究。
Genet Couns. 2010;21(2):157-68.
10
Testing an alternate informed consent process.测试一种替代的知情同意程序。
Nurs Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;58(2):135-9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c3df5.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Mobile-Based Personal Health Record for Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Management: Protocol for a Study Based on Action Research Design.基于行动研究设计的儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍管理移动个人健康记录的开发:一项研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 10;14:e60216. doi: 10.2196/60216.
2
Factors influencing decisions about whether to participate in health research by people of diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds: a realist review.影响不同族裔和文化背景人群参与健康研究决策的因素:一项实际主义综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 19;12(5):e058380. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058380.
3
Ethical Issues in Conducting Cross-Cultural Research in Low-Income Countries: A Pakistani Perspective.
在低收入国家开展跨文化研究中的伦理问题:巴基斯坦视角
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Nov 6;14(2):151-168. doi: 10.1007/s41649-021-00196-w. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Trust in research physicians as a key dimension of randomized controlled trial participation in clinical addictions research.信任研究医生是参与临床成瘾研究的随机对照试验的一个关键维度。
Subst Abus. 2021;42(4):927-934. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1900987. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
Improving Translation and Cultural Appropriateness of Spanish-Language Consent Materials for Biobanks.提高生物样本库西班牙语同意书的翻译质量及文化适应性
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Sep;41(5):16-27. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500028.
6
Attitudes Regarding Enrollment in a Genetic Research Project: An Informed Consent Simulation Study Comparing Views of People With Depression, Diabetes, and Neither Condition.关于参与基因研究项目的态度:一项知情同意模拟研究,比较抑郁症患者、糖尿病患者及无上述疾病者的观点
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Oct;14(4):328-337. doi: 10.1177/1556264619862467. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
7
Challenges in Recruiting African-Born, US-Based Participants for HIV and Tuberculosis Research.招募非裔美国籍 HIV 和结核病研究参与者面临的挑战。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2019 Jun;21(3):533-539. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0776-8.
8
Altruism, Scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born U.S. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial.外籍美国居民在结核病疫苗试验中的利他主义、怀疑态度和集体决策。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 23;18(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5460-3.
9
Culturally Competent Informed-Consent Process to Evaluate a Social Policy for Older Persons With Low Literacy: The Mexican Case.具有文化能力的知情同意过程,以评估一项针对低识字率老年人的社会政策:墨西哥案例。
Sage Open. 2016 Jul-Sep;6(3). doi: 10.1177/2158244016665886. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
10
Human biomonitoring from an environmental justice perspective: supporting study participation of women of Turkish and Moroccan descent.从环境正义视角看人体生物监测:支持土耳其和摩洛哥裔女性参与研究
Environ Health. 2017 May 19;16(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0260-2.