Teplova Vera V, Mikkola Raimo, Tonshin Anton A, Saris Nils-Erik L, Salkinoja-Salonen Mirja S
Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, Viikki Biocenter 1, POB 56, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2006 Jan 1;210(1-2):39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.06.012. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
Valinomycin and cereulide are bacterial toxins with closely similar chemical structure and properties but different toxic effects. Emetic poisoning is induced by cereulide but not by valinomycin. Both are specific potassium ionophores. Such compounds may affect mitochondrial functions. Both compounds cause a potassium-dependent drop in the transmembrane inner membrane potential due to the uptake of K+ as positively charged ionophore complex. Valinomycin is more potent than cereulide at high [K+] (>80 mM), whereas cereulide in contrast to valinomycin is active already at <1 mM. With cereulide, there is a substantial lag, while valinomycin acts without lag. Both ionophores induce mitochondrial swelling in the presence of K+, in the case of cereulide with a lag. These toxins strongly inhibited respiration at the level of complex IV when used at higher concentrations than that used for detection of ionophoretic transport of K+. At high [KCl] (120 mM), valinomycin was more potent than cereulide both as ionophore and inhibitor, but at low [KCl] (2.5 mM), cereulide was much more potent. Thus, valinomycin needed 20-30 mM KCl for substantial effects, cereulide only 1-3 mM K+, which is close to its level in blood serum. This explains the higher toxicity of cereulide at low concentrations with the positively charged potassium complex being accumulated in the cell by transport through the plasma membrane driven by the membrane potential. Furthermore, with similar concentrations, the final concentration of cereulide in the cells may become higher than that of valinomycin.
缬氨霉素和蜡样芽胞杆菌毒素是化学结构和性质极为相似但毒性作用不同的细菌毒素。蜡样芽胞杆菌毒素可引发呕吐中毒,而缬氨霉素则不会。二者均为特定的钾离子载体。这类化合物可能会影响线粒体功能。由于作为带正电荷离子载体复合物摄取K⁺,这两种化合物都会导致跨膜内膜电位出现钾离子依赖性下降。在高[K⁺](>80 mM)时,缬氨霉素比蜡样芽胞杆菌毒素更有效,而与缬氨霉素相反,蜡样芽胞杆菌毒素在<1 mM时就已具有活性。对于蜡样芽胞杆菌毒素,存在显著的延迟,而缬氨霉素则无延迟作用。在有K⁺存在的情况下,两种离子载体都会诱导线粒体肿胀,蜡样芽胞杆菌毒素的情况存在延迟。当使用高于用于检测K⁺离子载体转运浓度时,这些毒素在复合物IV水平强烈抑制呼吸作用。在高[KCl](120 mM)时,缬氨霉素作为离子载体和抑制剂都比蜡样芽胞杆菌毒素更有效,但在低[KCl](2.5 mM)时,蜡样芽胞杆菌毒素的效力要强得多。因此,缬氨霉素需要20 - 30 mM KCl才能产生显著效果,蜡样芽胞杆菌毒素仅需1 - 3 mM K⁺,这接近其在血清中的水平。这解释了蜡样芽胞杆菌毒素在低浓度时毒性更高的原因,带正电荷的钾复合物通过由膜电位驱动的质膜转运而在细胞内积累。此外,在浓度相似的情况下,细胞内蜡样芽胞杆菌毒素的最终浓度可能会高于缬氨霉素。