• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中改良无夹顺行神经保留及性功能评估验证

Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.

作者信息

Chien Gary W, Mikhail Albert A, Orvieto Marcelo A, Zagaja Gregory P, Sokoloff Mitchell H, Brendler Charles B, Shalhav Arieh L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2005 Aug;66(2):419-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.015
PMID:16040100
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We present our technique for clipless antegrade neurovascular bundle preservation during robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, along with short-term follow-up of our patients' sexual function.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Using the da Vinci three-arm robotic system, we performed robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using a transperitoneal approach in an antegrade fashion. After division of the bladder neck, the posterior plane of the prostate was developed distally toward the apex of the prostate in the midline. This plane was then developed completely, releasing the vascular pedicles and neurovascular bundles in a medial to lateral direction, with occasional use of bipolar cautery and without the use of clips or monopolar cautery. Patients with a minimal follow-up of 3 months who did not require open conversion were included in this study. A total of 56 patients met these inclusion criteria between February 2003 and May 2004, with a mean follow-up of 6 months. Patients were given the validated Rand Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Health Survey, version 2, with the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The overall score for both unilateral and bilateral nerve-sparing groups was 35.0, 39.7, 49.4, and 49.6 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. These coincided with a return to baseline potency rate of 47%, 54%, 66%, and 69% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade dissection of the neurovascular bundle, avoiding the use of clips or monopolar cautery during robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, may result in early return of sexual function and overall outcome similar to that after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

摘要

引言

我们介绍了在机器人腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中保留无夹顺行神经血管束的技术,以及对患者性功能的短期随访情况。

技术要点

使用达芬奇三臂机器人系统,我们采用经腹途径以顺行方式进行机器人腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。在离断膀胱颈后,于中线向前列腺尖部向远侧游离前列腺后平面。然后将该平面完全游离,从内侧向外侧释放血管蒂和神经血管束,偶尔使用双极电凝,不使用夹子或单极电凝。本研究纳入了随访至少3个月且无需转为开放手术的患者。2003年2月至2004年5月期间共有56例患者符合这些纳入标准,平均随访6个月。术前及术后1、3、6和12个月,患者接受了经过验证的兰德医学结果研究36项健康调查第2版以及加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校前列腺癌指数评估。单侧和双侧保留神经组术后1、3、6和12个月的总体评分分别为35.0、39.7、49.4和49.6。这些评分分别对应术后1、3、6和12个月恢复至基线勃起功能的比例为47%、54%、66%和69%。

结论

在机器人腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中,顺行游离神经血管束,避免使用夹子或单极电凝,可能会使性功能早期恢复,总体结果与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后相似。

相似文献

1
Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中改良无夹顺行神经保留及性功能评估验证
Urology. 2005 Aug;66(2):419-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.015.
2
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术:首批100例患者的一年随访
Urology. 2006 Dec;68(6):1275-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1060.
3
Evaluation of long-term thermal injury using cautery during nerve sparing robotic prostatectomy.在保留神经的机器人前列腺切除术中使用烧灼法评估长期热损伤
Urology. 2008 Dec;72(6):1371-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.101. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
4
Single institution 2-year patient reported validated sexual function outcomes after nerve sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy.单机构2年患者报告的保留神经机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后经过验证的性功能结果。
J Urol. 2009 Jan;181(1):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.015. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
5
Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation.机器人根治性前列腺切除术无烧灼保留神经血管束的可行性研究。
Urology. 2005 May;65(5):994-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.023.
6
Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?根治性前列腺切除术中腹腔镜下单侧腓肠神经移植术在保留性功能方面是否有效?
BJU Int. 2005 Jun;95(9):1267-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05501.x.
7
Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术对男性健康相关生活质量的短期影响及恢复的前瞻性评估。
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):854-8; discussion 859. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.051. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
8
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
9
Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的早期经验
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Mar;91(3):377-82.
10
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术:保留筋膜间神经的功能和病理结果
Eur Urol. 2007 Mar;51(3):755-62; discussion 763. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.019. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Clipless robot-assisted Retzius-sparing radical prostatectomy: a study on its safety profile and outcomes.无夹钳机器人辅助保留Retzius筋膜的根治性前列腺切除术:安全性及疗效研究
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 9;19(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02321-5.
2
Nerve-sparing Techniques During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Clips or Low-energy Bipolar Coagulation? Low Energy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的神经保留技术:钛夹还是低能量双极电凝?低能量。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Sep 1;44:102-103. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.06.011. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Different Nerve-Sparing Techniques during Radical Prostatectomy and Their Impact on Functional Outcomes.
根治性前列腺切除术中不同的神经保留技术及其对功能结局的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 22;14(7):1601. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071601.
4
Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Current perspectives.保留神经的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:当前观点
Asian J Urol. 2021 Jan;8(1):2-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing approach: surgical technique and one-year functional and oncologic outcomes.机器人辅助无夹闭筋膜内神经血管束保留前列腺癌根治术:手术技术及一年的功能和肿瘤学结果。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 19;10(1):17595. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74513-y.
6
Nerve-sparing techniques and results in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的神经保留技术及结果
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Dec;57(Suppl 2):S172-S184. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.S2.S172. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
7
Is the transition from open to robotic prostatectomy fair to your patients? A single-surgeon comparison with 2-year follow-up.开放手术向机器人前列腺切除术的转变是否对您的患者公平?一位外科医生的 2 年随访比较。
J Robot Surg. 2010 Jan;3(4):201-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0162-6. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
8
Athermal early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.在保留神经的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中,神经血管束的非热早期逆行释放。
J Robot Surg. 2009 Mar;3(1):13-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0127-9. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
9
High prostatic fascia release or standard nerve sparing? A viewpoint from the Royal Melbourne Hospital.前列腺筋膜高位松解术或标准神经保留术?来自皇家墨尔本医院的观点。
J Robot Surg. 2008 Sep;2(3):181-5. doi: 10.1007/s11701-008-0102-x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
10
Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中各种保留神经血管束技术的现状
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):187-200. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0607-7. Epub 2016 Jun 1.