• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加利福尼亚州的限制令:审视全州范围的数据。

Restraining orders in California: a look at statewide data.

作者信息

Sorenson Susan B, Shen Haikang

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2005 Jul;11(7):912-33. doi: 10.1177/1077801205276944.

DOI:10.1177/1077801205276944
PMID:16043577
Abstract

The authors tabulated statewide administrative data for all types of restraining orders. On June 6, 2003, there were 227,941 active restraining orders against adults in California; most were for domestic violence. Rates of restraining orders (i.e., restrained persons) were highest for men, African Americans, and 25- to 34-year-olds. In 72.2% of the orders, a woman was to be protected and a man was to be restrained; in 19.3%, the restrained and protected persons were of the same sex. Although state law prohibits the purchase or possession of a firearm by persons against whom a restraining order is issued, 9.2% of the orders documented no firearm restrictions.

摘要

作者将该州所有类型限制令的行政数据制成表格。2003年6月6日,加利福尼亚州针对成年人的有效限制令有227,941份;其中大部分是针对家庭暴力的。限制令的比率(即被限制者)在男性、非裔美国人以及25至34岁的人群中最高。在72.2%的限制令中,受保护的是女性,被限制的是男性;在19.3%的限制令中,被限制者和受保护者为同性。尽管州法律禁止对其发布限制令的人购买或持有枪支,但9.2%的限制令未记录任何枪支限制。

相似文献

1
Restraining orders in California: a look at statewide data.加利福尼亚州的限制令:审视全州范围的数据。
Violence Against Women. 2005 Jul;11(7):912-33. doi: 10.1177/1077801205276944.
2
Protective orders in rural and urban areas: a multiple perspective study.农村和城市地区的保护令:多视角研究
Violence Against Women. 2005 Jul;11(7):876-911. doi: 10.1177/1077801205276985.
3
Are temporary restraining orders more likely to be issued when applications mention firearms?当申请提及枪支时,临时限制令是否更有可能被发布?
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):266-82. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287403.
4
Domestic violence in the second half of life.晚年的家庭暴力
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2009 Apr;21(2):141-55. doi: 10.1080/08946560902779951.
5
Protective orders: questions and conundrums.保护令:问题与难题。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2006 Jul;7(3):175-205. doi: 10.1177/1524838006288930.
6
Empowering battered women transnationally: the case for postmodern interventions.跨国增强受虐妇女的权能:后现代干预的案例
Soc Work. 1996 May;41(3):261-8.
7
Restraining orders among victims of intimate partner homicide.亲密伴侣杀人案受害者之间的限制令。
Inj Prev. 2008 Jun;14(3):191-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2007.017947.
8
Women's experiences of violence and seeking help.女性遭受暴力及寻求帮助的经历。
Violence Against Women. 2009 Jul;15(7):852-68. doi: 10.1177/1077801209334445. Epub 2009 May 19.
9
Modelling the effects of intimate partner violence and access to resources on women's health in the early years after leaving an abusive partner.模拟亲密伴侣暴力以及获取资源对女性离开虐待性伴侣后早年健康状况的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(6):1021-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
10
The impact of differential patterns of physical violence and stalking on mental health and help-seeking among women with protective orders.身体暴力和跟踪骚扰的不同模式对拥有保护令的女性心理健康及寻求帮助行为的影响。
Violence Against Women. 2006 Sep;12(9):866-86. doi: 10.1177/1077801206292679.

引用本文的文献

1
Intimate Partner Violence Survivorship, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Disaster: Implications for Future Disasters.亲密伴侣暴力幸存者、创伤后应激障碍与灾害:对未来灾害的启示。
Violence Against Women. 2024 Oct;30(12-13):3251-3271. doi: 10.1177/10778012231176205. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
Assessment of Extreme Risk Protection Order Use in California From 2016 to 2019.评估 2016 年至 2019 年期间加利福尼亚州极端风险保护令的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207735. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7735.
3
Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders.
家庭暴力限制令受访者中的枪支与逮捕发生率
Inj Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;2(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40621-015-0047-2. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
4
Identifying armed respondents to domestic violence restraining orders and recovering their firearms: process evaluation of an initiative in California.识别持有家庭暴力限制令的武装回应者并收回其枪支:加利福尼亚州的一项倡议的过程评估。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e113-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301484. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
5
Women with protective orders report failure to remove firearms from their abusive partners: results from an exploratory study.有保护令的女性报告称未能将枪支从其施虐伴侣手中移除:一项探索性研究的结果。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Jan;19(1):93-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0530.
6
Using administrative data for longitudinal substance abuse research.利用行政数据进行纵向药物滥用研究。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):252-71. doi: 10.1007/s11414-008-9125-3. Epub 2008 Aug 5.