• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别持有家庭暴力限制令的武装回应者并收回其枪支:加利福尼亚州的一项倡议的过程评估。

Identifying armed respondents to domestic violence restraining orders and recovering their firearms: process evaluation of an initiative in California.

机构信息

Garen J. Wintemute and Barbara E. Claire are with the Violence Prevention Research Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento. Shannon Frattaroli, Katherine A. Vittes, and Daniel W. Webster are with the Center for Gun Policy and Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e113-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301484. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301484
PMID:24328660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3935681/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated a law enforcement initiative to screen respondents to domestic violence restraining orders for firearm ownership or possession and recover their firearms.

METHODS

The initiative was implemented in San Mateo and Butte counties in California from 2007 through 2010. We used descriptive methods to evaluate the screening process and recovery effort in each county, relying on records for individual cases.

RESULTS

Screening relied on an archive of firearm transactions, court records, and petitioner interviews; no single source was adequate. Screening linked 525 respondents (17.7%) in San Mateo County to firearms; 405 firearms were recovered from 119 (22.7%) of them. In Butte County, 88 (31.1%) respondents were linked to firearms; 260 firearms were recovered from 45 (51.1%) of them. Nonrecovery occurred most often when orders were never served or respondents denied having firearms. There were no reports of serious violence or injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovering firearms from persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders is possible. We have identified design and implementation changes that may improve the screening process and the yield from recovery efforts. Larger implementation trials are needed.

摘要

目的

我们评估了一项执法倡议,即对家庭暴力限制令的被申请人进行枪支拥有或持有情况筛查,并收回其枪支。

方法

该倡议于 2007 年至 2010 年在加利福尼亚州圣马特奥县和巴特县实施。我们使用描述性方法评估了每个县的筛查过程和回收工作,依赖于对个别案件的记录。

结果

筛查依赖于枪支交易档案、法庭记录和申请人访谈;没有单一的来源是足够的。在圣马特奥县,筛查将 525 名(17.7%)被申请人与枪支联系起来;从 119 名(22.7%)被申请人中回收了 405 支枪支。在巴特县,88 名(31.1%)被申请人与枪支有关联;从 45 名(51.1%)被申请人中回收了 260 支枪支。最常见的情况是当限制令从未送达或被申请人否认拥有枪支时,枪支无法被收回。没有关于严重暴力或伤害的报告。

结论

从受家庭暴力限制令约束的人手中收回枪支是可行的。我们已经确定了可能改进筛查过程和回收工作效果的设计和实施变更。需要进行更大规模的实施试验。

相似文献

1
Identifying armed respondents to domestic violence restraining orders and recovering their firearms: process evaluation of an initiative in California.识别持有家庭暴力限制令的武装回应者并收回其枪支:加利福尼亚州的一项倡议的过程评估。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e113-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301484. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
2
Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders.家庭暴力限制令受访者中的枪支与逮捕发生率
Inj Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;2(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40621-015-0047-2. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
3
Removing guns from batterers: findings from a pilot survey of domestic violence restraining order recipients in California.从加利福尼亚州的家庭暴力限制令接受者的试点调查中获取的有关收缴施虐者枪支的信息。
Violence Against Women. 2013 May;19(5):602-16. doi: 10.1177/1077801213490561. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
4
Disarming batterers through restraining orders: the promise and the reality in California.通过限制令制服施暴者:加利福尼亚州的前景与现实
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):245-65. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287675.
5
Taking guns from batterers: public support and policy implications.从施暴者手中收缴枪支:公众支持及政策影响。
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):361-73. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287217.
6
Are temporary restraining orders more likely to be issued when applications mention firearms?当申请提及枪支时,临时限制令是否更有可能被发布?
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):266-82. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287403.
7
Firearm Violence Following the Implementation of California's Gun Violence Restraining Order Law.加州枪支暴力限制令法实施后枪支暴力事件分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e224216. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4216.
8
Removing Firearms From Those Prohibited From Possession by Domestic Violence Restraining Orders: A Survey and Analysis of State Laws.从被家庭暴力限制令禁止拥有枪支的人手中收缴枪支:对州法律的调查和分析。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019 Jan;20(1):114-125. doi: 10.1177/1524838017692384. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
9
Implementation and perceived effectiveness of gun violence restraining orders in California: A qualitative evaluation.加利福尼亚州枪支暴力限制令的实施情况和感知效果:定性评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 19;16(10):e0258547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258547. eCollection 2021.
10
Gun violence restraining orders in California, 2016-2018: case details and respondent mortality.2016-2018 年加利福尼亚州枪支暴力限制令:案例详情和被告死亡率。
Inj Prev. 2022 Oct;28(5):465-471. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2022-044544. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
State Efforts to Enforce Firearm Dispossession Through Relinquishment Laws.国家通过收缴法律来强制收缴枪支的努力。
Criminol Public Policy. 2024 Nov;23(4):893-918. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12677. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
2
CHASE (Children's Housing Assessment for a Safe Environment): a protocol for the inspection and modification of injury risks in children's homes.CHASE(儿童安全环境住房评估):一项针对儿童家庭伤害风险进行检查与整改的方案。
Inj Epidemiol. 2023 Oct 11;10(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40621-023-00460-7.
3
Firearms and protective orders in intimate partner homicides.亲密伴侣杀人案中的枪支与保护令
J Fam Violence. 2021;36:587-596. doi: 10.1007/s10896-020-00165-1. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
4
Extreme risk protection orders in King County, Washington: the epidemiology of dangerous behaviors and an intervention response.华盛顿州金县的极端风险保护令:危险行为的流行病学及干预应对措施
Inj Epidemiol. 2020 Jul 22;7(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-00270-1.
5
Assessment of Extreme Risk Protection Order Use in California From 2016 to 2019.评估 2016 年至 2019 年期间加利福尼亚州极端风险保护令的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207735. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7735.
6
After the gun: examining police visits and intimate partner violence following incidents involving a firearm.涉枪事件后:调查警方介入和亲密伴侣暴力事件 **解析**:原文中的“After the gun”直译为“在枪之后”,这里指的是涉枪事件,所以翻译为“涉枪事件后”。“intimate partner violence”指的是亲密伴侣暴力,因此翻译为“亲密伴侣暴力事件”。
J Behav Med. 2019 Aug;42(4):591-602. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00013-8. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
7
Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma firearm injury prevention statement.东部创伤外科学会枪支伤害预防声明
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 Feb 28;4(1):e000294. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000294. eCollection 2019.
8
Firearm Ownership in High-Conflict Families: Differences According to State Laws Restricting Firearms to Misdemeanor Crimes of Domestic Violence Offenders.高冲突家庭中的枪支拥有情况:根据将枪支限制于家庭暴力轻罪罪犯的州法律的差异
J Fam Violence. 2018 Jul;33(5):297-313. doi: 10.1007/s10896-018-9966-3. Epub 2018 May 17.
9
Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders.家庭暴力限制令受访者中的枪支与逮捕发生率
Inj Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;2(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40621-015-0047-2. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Removing guns from batterers: findings from a pilot survey of domestic violence restraining order recipients in California.从加利福尼亚州的家庭暴力限制令接受者的试点调查中获取的有关收缴施虐者枪支的信息。
Violence Against Women. 2013 May;19(5):602-16. doi: 10.1177/1077801213490561. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
2
Effects of domestic violence policies, alcohol taxes and police staffing levels on intimate partner homicide in large US cities.美国大城市中家庭暴力政策、酒精税和警察人员配置水平对亲密伴侣杀人案的影响。
Inj Prev. 2010 Apr;16(2):90-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2009.024620.
3
Batterers' use of guns to threaten intimate partners.施虐者使用枪支威胁亲密伴侣。
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2005 Winter;60(1):62-8.
4
Do laws restricting access to firearms by domestic violence offenders prevent intimate partner homicide?限制家庭暴力罪犯获取枪支的法律能否预防亲密伴侣杀人案?
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):313-46. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287307.
5
Restraining orders in California: a look at statewide data.加利福尼亚州的限制令:审视全州范围的数据。
Violence Against Women. 2005 Jul;11(7):912-33. doi: 10.1177/1077801205276944.
6
Protective orders in rural and urban areas: a multiple perspective study.农村和城市地区的保护令:多视角研究
Violence Against Women. 2005 Jul;11(7):876-911. doi: 10.1177/1077801205276985.
7
Weapons in the lives of battered women.受虐妇女生活中的“武器”
Am J Public Health. 2004 Aug;94(8):1412-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.8.1412.
8
Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study.虐待关系中杀害女性行为的风险因素:一项多地点病例对照研究的结果。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jul;93(7):1089-97. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.7.1089.
9
Subsequent criminal activity among violent misdemeanants who seek to purchase handguns: risk factors and effectiveness of denying handgun purchase.试图购买手枪的暴力轻罪者随后的犯罪活动:风险因素及拒绝手枪购买的有效性
JAMA. 2001 Feb 28;285(8):1019-26. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.8.1019.
10
Effectiveness of denial of handgun purchase to persons believed to be at high risk for firearm violence.拒绝向被认为有高枪支暴力风险的人出售手枪的有效性。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Jan;89(1):88-90. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.1.88.