Suppr超能文献

晚年生活质量评估:QuiLL量表的编制与验证

Assessment of quality of life in later life: development and validation of the QuiLL.

作者信息

Evans Sherrill, Gately Claire, Huxley Peter, Smith Alyson, Banerjee Sube

机构信息

Social Work and Social Care Section, Health Services Resesarch Department, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2005 Jun;14(5):1291-300. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-5532-y.

Abstract

The aim was to develop a quality of life (QOL) instrument, informed by older people, carers and professionals in older peoples' services, for use by community care staff as part of their assessment, care-planning and outcome monitoring procedures. The multi-phase development project involved: qualitative interviews to generate the item pool; pre-testing; preliminary field-testing; and final testing in a community survey and in health and social care settings. The process was informed by over 100 interviews with older people, carers, professionals, academics and policy-makers. Two products emerged following data-reduction: a research instrument (64 items), and a shorter assessment tool suitable for routine use in clinical, therapeutic or case-management practice (27 items, taking 7-15 min to complete). A community survey using the research instrument achieved a 71% response rate (n = 249). Ninety six percent of people found the domain content of the assessment tool relevant, and 80% considered the items covered were important. Both instruments have good internal consistency (alpha = 0.85). Inter-rater reliability was good for research staff, but poor between them and operational staff. Little objective change took place during the 3-month follow-up study, but where it did the direction was consistent with subjective change. The instrument needs to be applied in different contexts to assess interventions of known impact. Together with daily living and health status measures it can form part of a comprehensive assessment for older people.

摘要

目标是开发一种生活质量(QOL)工具,该工具由老年人、护理人员以及老年服务领域的专业人员提供信息,供社区护理人员在评估、护理计划和结果监测程序中使用。这个多阶段开发项目包括:进行定性访谈以生成项目库;预测试;初步实地测试;以及在社区调查、健康和社会护理环境中进行最终测试。该过程参考了对100多名老年人、护理人员、专业人员、学者和政策制定者的访谈。经过数据精简后产生了两种产品:一种研究工具(64个项目),以及一种更简短的评估工具,适用于临床、治疗或病例管理实践中的常规使用(27个项目,完成时间为7 - 15分钟)。使用该研究工具进行的社区调查获得了71%的回复率(n = 249)。96%的人认为评估工具的领域内容相关,80%的人认为所涵盖的项目很重要。两种工具都具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.85)。研究人员之间的评分者间信度良好,但研究人员与操作人员之间的评分者间信度较差。在3个月的随访研究中几乎没有发生客观变化,但确实发生变化的方向与主观变化一致。该工具需要在不同背景下应用,以评估已知有影响的干预措施。与日常生活和健康状况测量一起,它可以构成对老年人全面评估的一部分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验