Slater D N, Rice S, Stewart R, Melling S E, Hewer E M, Smith J H F
Quality Assurance Reference Centre for the NHS Cervical Screening Programme for the East Midlands Region, Sheffield, UK.
Cytopathology. 2005 Aug;16(4):179-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2005.00271.x.
In 1986, the British Society for Clinical Cytology (BSCC) published quantitative criteria to assist diagnosis in a three-tier grading system of squamous cell dyskaryosis. In dyskaryotic cells, area nuclear to cytoplasmic (NC) ratios below 50%, between 50% and 66% and over 66% were defined as equating with mild, moderate and severe grades respectively. Following the Terminology Conference in 2002, however, the BSCC recommended on their website that the three-tier model should be replaced by a new two-tier system of low- and high-grade squamous abnormalities. The latter broadly equate with the two-grade Bethesda System (TBS) for reporting squamous intraepithelial lesions. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of the BSCC three-tier quantitative definitions, to investigate if they were applicable to liquid-based cytology (LBC) and to see how they related to the proposed new two-tier BSCC system.
Quantitative image analysis was undertaken on illustrations from the 1986 BSCC terminology publication and on microscope slides from external quality assessment and Cytology Training Centre teaching sets.
Analysis of mean NC ratios showed that mild, moderate and severe dyskaryosis exist as statistically different populations. Overlap of NC ratio ranges, however, limits their practical application in the three-tier model, although interestingly no overlap was noted between mild and severe dyskaryosis. No grade of dyskaryosis had a mean area NC ratio over 50%, indicating that the BSCC quantitative definitions are incorrect. The mean diameter NC ratios for mild, moderate and severe dyskaryosis were found to be 40%, 49% and 66% respectively. Accordingly it is possible that those reporting cervical cytology could be interpreting the BSCC NC ratios as meaning diameter rather than area. Amalgamation of the three-tier results into the proposed two-tier model shows that the resulting mean NC area and diameter ratios identify statistically different low- and high-grade populations. The reduced degree of overlap, however, of NC ratio ranges in the two-tier model implies that NC ratios could have a useful practical role in the separation of the low- and high-grade categories. The two categories were reasonably well separated by mean area and diameter NC ratios of 25% and 50% respectively. A two-tier model combining mild with moderate rather than severe dyskaryosis was found to be a statistically valid alternative but gave rise to NC ratios that would be difficult to use in practice. Except for moderate dyskaryosis, no significant differences were identified between the mean NC ratios of either conventional and LBC preparations or LBC preparations using two different commercial methodologies (SurePath and ThinPrep). Differences, however, were noted in area measurements between SurePath and ThinPrep and this has potential implications for classifications (such as TBS) using area comparisons as their basis. In addition, it was found that the increased NC ratio, associated with higher grades of dyskaryosis is more a consequence of progressive cytoplasmic area reduction rather than nuclear area increase. The similar NC ratios of borderline nuclear changes associated with human papilloma virus and mild dyskaryosis support the BSCC proposal that these can be combined to constitute a low-grade category. This study shows that the BSCC area NC ratio criteria of grading squamous cell dyskaryosis require amendment. In addition, this study supports the new BSCC recommendation of low- and high-grade squamous cell categories.
The study proposes Sheffield quantitative criteria to assist the grading of squamous cell abnormalities. Quantitative diameter NC ratio measurements, however, must always be accompanied by detailed assessment of qualitative morphological features and in particular those relating to nuclear chromatin. This is equally relevant to both two- and three-tier models.
1986年,英国临床细胞学学会(BSCC)发布了定量标准,以辅助鳞状细胞异常核型的三级分级系统进行诊断。在异常核型细胞中,核质面积(NC)比低于50%、介于50%和66%之间以及超过66%分别被定义为等同于轻度、中度和重度等级。然而,在2002年术语会议之后,BSCC在其网站上建议,三级模型应由新的低级别和高级别鳞状异常的两级系统取代。后者大致等同于用于报告鳞状上皮内病变的两级贝塞斯达系统(TBS)。本研究的目的是评估BSCC三级定量定义的准确性和可重复性,调查它们是否适用于液基细胞学(LBC),并了解它们与提议的新的BSCC两级系统的关系。
对1986年BSCC术语出版物中的插图以及来自外部质量评估和细胞学培训中心教学集的显微镜载玻片进行定量图像分析。
平均NC比分析表明,轻度、中度和重度异常核型作为统计学上不同的群体存在。然而,NC比范围的重叠限制了它们在三级模型中的实际应用,尽管有趣的是,轻度和重度异常核型之间未发现重叠。没有任何等级的异常核型的平均核质面积比超过50%,这表明BSCC的定量定义是不正确的。发现轻度、中度和重度异常核型的平均直径NC比分别为40%、49%和66%。因此,那些报告宫颈细胞学的人有可能将BSCC的NC比解释为直径而非面积。将三级结果合并到提议的两级模型中表明,由此产生的平均NC面积和直径比可识别出统计学上不同的低级别和高级别群体。然而,两级模型中NC比范围的重叠程度降低意味着NC比在低级别和高级别分类的区分中可能具有有用的实际作用。这两个类别通过平均面积NC比25%和平均直径NC比50%能得到较好的区分。发现将轻度与中度而非重度异常核型合并的两级模型在统计学上是有效的替代方案,但会产生在实际中难以使用的NC比。除了中度异常核型外,传统制片和LBC制片或使用两种不同商业方法(SurePath和ThinPrep)的LBC制片的平均NC比之间未发现显著差异。然而,SurePath和ThinPrep在面积测量上存在差异