• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大脆弱拟杆菌群药敏模式调查。

Survey of Bacteroides fragilis group susceptibility patterns in Canada.

作者信息

Bourgault A M, Lamothe F, Hoban D J, Dalton M T, Kibsey P C, Harding G, Smith J A, Low D E, Gilbert H

机构信息

Hôpital Saint-Luc, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Feb;36(2):343-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.2.343.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.36.2.343
PMID:1605600
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC188439/
Abstract

The in vitro activities of penicillin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, metronidazole, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, cefotetan, moxalactam, and imipenem against 348 Bacteroides fragilis group isolates collected from six Canadian cities during 1990 were determined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) agar dilution technique. All isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol, metronidazole, piperacillin-tazobactam, and imipenem. For the other antibiotics tested, the following resistance rates were observed: penicillin, 97%; clindamycin, 9%; piperacillin, 19%; ticarcillin, 31%; ticarcillin-clavulanate, 0.28%; ampicillin-sulbactam, 0.85%; cefoxitin, 26%; ceftizoxime, 15%; cefotetan, 53%; and moxalactam, 17%. Susceptibility profiles to beta-lactam antibiotics varied among the different species tested: B. fragilis and Bacteroides vulgatus demonstrated lower resistance rates than Bacteroides distasonis and indole-positive Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Bacteroides ovatus. Ceftizoxime results should be interpreted cautiously, because the MICs obtained with the recommended NCCLS control strain were lower than expected.

摘要

采用美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)琼脂稀释法,测定了1990年从加拿大6个城市收集的348株脆弱拟杆菌属菌株对青霉素、克林霉素、氯霉素、甲硝唑、哌拉西林、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦、替卡西林、替卡西林-克拉维酸、氨苄西林-舒巴坦、头孢西丁、头孢唑肟、头孢替坦、莫西沙星和亚胺培南的体外活性。所有菌株对氯霉素、甲硝唑、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和亚胺培南敏感。对于其他测试抗生素,观察到以下耐药率:青霉素,97%;克林霉素,9%;哌拉西林,19%;替卡西林,31%;替卡西林-克拉维酸,0.28%;氨苄西林-舒巴坦,0.85%;头孢西丁,26%;头孢唑肟,15%;头孢替坦,53%;莫西沙星,17%。不同测试菌种对β-内酰胺类抗生素敏感性不同:脆弱拟杆菌和普通拟杆菌的耐药率低于狄氏拟杆菌、产吲哚栖瘤胃拟杆菌和卵形拟杆菌。头孢唑肟结果应谨慎解读,因为使用推荐的NCCLS对照菌株获得的最低抑菌浓度低于预期。

相似文献

1
Survey of Bacteroides fragilis group susceptibility patterns in Canada.加拿大脆弱拟杆菌群药敏模式调查。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Feb;36(2):343-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.2.343.
2
Annual incidence, epidemiology, and comparative in vitro susceptibilities to cefoxitin, cefotetan, cefmetazole, and ceftizoxime of recent community-acquired isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.脆弱拟杆菌群近期社区获得性分离株的年发病率、流行病学以及对头孢西丁、头孢替坦、头孢美唑和头孢唑肟的体外敏感性比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Nov;26(11):2361-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.11.2361-2366.1988.
3
Beta-lactamase production, beta-lactam sensitivity and resistance to synergy with clavulanate of 737 Bacteroides fragilis group organisms from thirty-three US centres.来自美国33个中心的737株脆弱拟杆菌属微生物的β-内酰胺酶产生情况、β-内酰胺敏感性以及与克拉维酸协同作用的耐药性
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Sep;26(3):361-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.3.361.
4
Susceptibility trends of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates from Buenos Aires, Argentina.来自阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯的脆弱拟杆菌群分离株的药敏趋势。
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2007 Jul-Sep;39(3):156-60.
5
Multicenter study of in vitro susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group, 1995 to 1996, with comparison of resistance trends from 1990 to 1996.1995年至1996年脆弱拟杆菌群体外药敏的多中心研究,以及1990年至1996年耐药趋势比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Oct;43(10):2417-22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.10.2417.
6
In-vitro activity of amoxycillin and ticarcillin in combination with clavulanic acid compared with that of new beta-lactam agents against species of the Bacteroides fragilis group.阿莫西林和替卡西林与克拉维酸联合使用的体外活性与新型β-内酰胺类药物针对脆弱拟杆菌群各菌种的活性比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 May;17(5):593-603. doi: 10.1093/jac/17.5.593.
7
Analysis of trends in antimicrobial resistance patterns among clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group species from 1990 to 1994.1990年至1994年间脆弱拟杆菌群临床分离株抗菌药物耐药模式的趋势分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Dec;23 Suppl 1:S54-65. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.supplement_1.s54.
8
First national survey of antibiotic susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group: emerging resistance to carbapenems in Argentina.首个关于脆弱拟杆菌群抗生素敏感性的全国性调查:阿根廷出现碳青霉烯类耐药。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Mar;56(3):1309-14. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05622-11. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
9
Comparative susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group species and other anaerobic bacteria to meropenem, imipenem, piperacillin, cefoxitin, ampicillin/sulbactam, clindamycin and metronidazole.脆弱拟杆菌群物种及其他厌氧菌对美罗培南、亚胺培南、哌拉西林、头孢西丁、氨苄西林/舒巴坦、克林霉素和甲硝唑的敏感性比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31(3):363-72. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.3.363.
10
Bacteremia due to Bacteroides fragilis group: distribution of species, beta-lactamase production, and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.脆弱拟杆菌群所致菌血症:菌种分布、β-内酰胺酶产生情况及抗菌药物敏感性模式
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Jan;47(1):148-53. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.148-153.2003.

引用本文的文献

1
: intriguing aerotolerant gut anaerobe with emerging antimicrobial resistance and pathogenic and probiotic roles in human health.: 一种具有新兴抗微生物耐药性的有趣的耐气肠道厌氧菌,在人类健康中具有致病性和益生菌作用。
Gut Microbes. 2021 Jan-Dec;13(1):1922241. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1922241.
2
Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group in Canada in 2010-2011: CANWARD surveillance study.2010-2011 年加拿大脆弱拟杆菌群临床分离株的抗菌药物耐药性流行情况:CANWARD 监测研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Mar;56(3):1247-52. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05823-11. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
3
New developments and concepts in antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infections.腹腔内感染抗菌治疗的新进展与新观念
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2000 Aug;2(4):277-82. doi: 10.1007/s11894-000-0019-7.
4
Trends in antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group from 1992 to 1997 in Montreal, Canada.1992年至1997年加拿大蒙特利尔脆弱拟杆菌群临床分离株的抗菌药物耐药性趋势
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Oct;43(10):2517-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.10.2517.
5
Primary and secondary peritonitis: an update.原发性和继发性腹膜炎:最新进展
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Aug;17(8):542-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01708616.
6
Efficacy, safety, and tolerance of piperacillin/tazobactam compared to co-amoxiclav plus an aminoglycoside in the treatment of severe pneumonia.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与阿莫西林/克拉维酸加氨基糖苷类药物相比治疗重症肺炎的疗效、安全性及耐受性
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 May;17(5):313-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01709453.
7
Metronidazole. A therapeutic review and update.甲硝唑:治疗综述与更新
Drugs. 1997 Nov;54(5):679-708. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199754050-00003.
8
Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.亚胺培南/西司他丁:其抗菌活性、药代动力学及治疗严重感染疗效的最新进展
Drugs. 1996 Jan;51(1):99-136. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651010-00008.
9
Comparison of cefoxitin and ceftizoxime in a hospital therapeutic interchange program.头孢西丁与头孢唑肟在医院治疗性药物替换计划中的比较。
CMAJ. 1993 Apr 1;148(7):1161-9.
10
Antimicrobial resistance in human oral and intestinal anaerobic microfloras.人类口腔和肠道厌氧微生物群中的抗菌药物耐药性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Aug;37(8):1665-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.8.1665.

本文引用的文献

1
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of 1,292 isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States: comparison of 1981 with 1982.美国1292株脆弱拟杆菌属细菌的药敏情况:1981年与1982年的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Aug;26(2):145-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.26.2.145.
2
Nationwide study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States.美国全国范围内脆弱拟杆菌群药敏性研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Nov;28(5):675-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.5.675.
3
Survey of anaerobic susceptibility patterns in Canada.加拿大厌氧菌药敏模式调查。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Nov;30(5):798-801. doi: 10.1128/AAC.30.5.798.
4
Antibiotic- and method-dependent variation in susceptibility testing results of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.脆弱拟杆菌群分离株药敏试验结果的抗生素及方法依赖性变异
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Dec;25(12):2317-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.12.2317-2321.1987.
5
Ceftizoxime and cefoxitin susceptibility testing against anaerobic bacteria: comparison of results from three NCCLS methods and quality control recommendations for the reference agar dilution procedure.头孢唑肟和头孢西丁对厌氧菌的药敏试验:三种美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)方法结果的比较及参考琼脂稀释法的质量控制建议
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1987 Oct;8(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90154-4.
6
Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States: analysis by site of isolation.美国脆弱拟杆菌群的药敏性:按分离部位分析
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 May;32(5):717-22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.5.717.
7
Controversies in susceptibility testing of anaerobes.厌氧菌药敏试验中的争议
Clin Ther. 1987;10 Suppl A:2-11.
8
Annual incidence, epidemiology, and comparative in vitro susceptibilities to cefoxitin, cefotetan, cefmetazole, and ceftizoxime of recent community-acquired isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.脆弱拟杆菌群近期社区获得性分离株的年发病率、流行病学以及对头孢西丁、头孢替坦、头孢美唑和头孢唑肟的体外敏感性比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Nov;26(11):2361-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.11.2361-2366.1988.
9
In vitro activity of cefotetan compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.头孢替坦与其他抗菌药物对厌氧菌的体外活性比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Apr;32(4):601-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.4.601.
10
Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.厌氧菌的药敏试验。
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jul;26(7):1253-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.7.1253-1256.1988.