• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向一种更务实的道德观方法:对科尔伯格模型的批判性评估。

Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: a critical evaluation of Kohlberg's model.

作者信息

Krebs Dennis L, Denton Kathy

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2005 Jul;112(3):629-49. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.629.

DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.629
PMID:16060754
Abstract

In this article, the authors evaluate L. Kohlberg's (1984) cognitive- developmental approach to morality, find it wanting, and introduce a more pragmatic approach. They review research designed to evaluate Kohlberg's model, describe how they revised the model to accommodate discrepant findings, and explain why they concluded that it is poorly equipped to account for the ways in which people make moral decisions in their everyday lives. The authors outline in 11 propositions a framework for a new approach that is more attentive to the purposes that people use morality to achieve. People make moral judgments and engage in moral behaviors to induce themselves and others to uphold systems of cooperative exchange that help them achieve their goals and advance their interests.

摘要

在本文中,作者评估了劳伦斯·科尔伯格(1984)的道德认知发展方法,发现其存在不足,并引入了一种更务实的方法。他们回顾了旨在评估科尔伯格模型的研究,描述了他们如何修订该模型以适应不一致的研究结果,并解释了为什么他们得出结论认为该模型难以解释人们在日常生活中做出道德决策的方式。作者在11个命题中概述了一种新方法的框架,该方法更关注人们利用道德来实现的目的。人们做出道德判断并参与道德行为,以促使自己和他人维护合作交换体系,这些体系有助于他们实现目标并增进自身利益。

相似文献

1
Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: a critical evaluation of Kohlberg's model.迈向一种更务实的道德观方法:对科尔伯格模型的批判性评估。
Psychol Rev. 2005 Jul;112(3):629-49. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.629.
2
Should Kohlberg's cognitive developmental approach to morality be replaced with a more pragmatic approach? Comment on Krebs and Denton (2005).科尔伯格关于道德的认知发展方法是否应该被一种更注重实际的方法所取代?对克雷布斯和丹顿(2005年)的评论。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Jul;113(3):666-71. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.666.
3
Explanatory limitations of cognitive-developmental approaches to morality.认知发展道德观方法的解释局限性。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Jul;113(3):672-5. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.672.
4
The evolution of moral dispositions in the human species.人类物种中道德倾向的演变。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 Apr;907:132-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06620.x.
5
Tom, Huck, and Oliver Stone as advocates in Kohlberg's just community: theory-based strategies for moral education.汤姆、哈克以及奥利弗·斯通作为科尔伯格公正社区中的倡导者:基于理论的道德教育策略
Adolescence. 1991 Summer;26(102):319-29.
6
An adjusted version of Kohlberg's moral theory: discussion of its validity for research in nursing ethics.科尔伯格道德理论的修正版:探讨其在护理伦理学研究中的有效性
J Adv Nurs. 1998 Apr;27(4):829-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00597.x.
7
Culture and the quest for universal principles in moral reasoning.文化与道德推理中普遍原则的追求。
Int J Psychol. 2011 Jun 1;46(3):161-76. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.568486.
8
Kohlberg's theory of moral development: insights into rights reasoning.科尔伯格的道德发展理论:对权利推理的见解
Med Law. 2000;19(3):351-72.
9
Family processes as predictors of adolescents' preferences for ascribed sources of moral authority: a proposed model.家庭过程作为青少年对既定道德权威来源偏好的预测因素:一个提议的模型。
Adolescence. 1996 Spring;31(121):133-44.
10
In search of an everyday morality: the development of a measure.寻找日常道德准则:一种测量方法的发展
Adolescence. 1990 Winter;25(100):923-43.

引用本文的文献

1
Fair Play in a Context of Physical Education and Sports Behaviours.体育教育与体育行为背景下的公平竞赛
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 21;19(4):2452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042452.
2
Adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: The role of sociodemographic and personality factors.对新冠疫情缓解措施的遵守:社会人口学和人格因素的作用。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(9):7771-7787. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02051-5. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
3
Psychosocial determinants of sexual norms and their impact on sexual debut in Polish adolescents.
心理社会决定因素对波兰青少年性规范及其初次性行为的影响。
Int J Public Health. 2020 Nov;65(8):1393-1401. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01470-8. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
How Can Men Convicted of Violence Against Women Feel Moral While Holding Sexist and Violent Attitudes? A Homeostatic Moral Model Based on Self-Deception.对女性实施暴力的男性在持有性别歧视和暴力态度时,怎么还能觉得自己有道德呢?一种基于自我欺骗的稳态道德模型。
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Sep;12(5):1554-1562. doi: 10.1177/1557988318774218. Epub 2018 May 8.
5
Determination of surgical priorities in appendicitis based on the probability of undetected appendiceal perforation.基于未检测到的阑尾穿孔概率确定阑尾炎手术优先级
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 21;21(7):2131-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2131.
6
The moral development of the child: an integrated model.儿童道德发展:一种综合模型。
Front Public Health. 2013 Nov 18;1:57. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2013.00057. eCollection 2013.
7
The moral judgment of juvenile delinquents: a meta-analysis.青少年犯罪的道德判断:一项元分析
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2006 Oct;34(5):697-713. doi: 10.1007/s10802-006-9056-5. Epub 2006 Oct 18.