• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区获得性肺炎患者中病原体导向性抗生素治疗与经验性广谱抗生素治疗的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Comparison between pathogen directed antibiotic treatment and empirical broad spectrum antibiotic treatment in patients with community acquired pneumonia: a prospective randomised study.

作者信息

van der Eerden M M, Vlaspolder F, de Graaff C S, Groot T, Bronsveld W, Jansen H M, Boersma W G

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Thorax. 2005 Aug;60(8):672-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.030411.

DOI:10.1136/thx.2004.030411
PMID:16061709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1747487/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is much controversy about the ideal approach to the management of community acquired pneumonia (CAP). Recommendations differ from a pathogen directed approach to an empirical strategy with broad spectrum antibiotics.

METHODS

In a prospective randomised open study performed between 1998 and 2000, a pathogen directed treatment (PDT) approach was compared with an empirical broad spectrum antibiotic treatment (EAT) strategy according to the ATS guidelines of 1993 in 262 hospitalised patients with CAP. Clinical efficacy was primarily determined by the length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcome parameters for clinical efficacy were assessment of therapeutic failure on antibiotics, 30 day mortality, duration of antibiotic treatment, resolution of fever, side effects, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Three hundred and three patients were enrolled in the study; 41 were excluded, leaving 262 with results available for analysis. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups in LOS, 30 day mortality, clinical failure, or resolution of fever. Side effects, although they did not have a significant influence on the outcome parameters, occurred more frequently in patients in the EAT group than in those in the PDT group (60% v 17%, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.3; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

An EAT strategy with broad spectrum antibiotics for the management of hospitalised patients with CAP has comparable clinical efficacy to a PDT approach.

摘要

背景

关于社区获得性肺炎(CAP)管理的理想方法存在诸多争议。建议从针对病原体的方法到使用广谱抗生素的经验性策略各不相同。

方法

在1998年至2000年进行的一项前瞻性随机开放研究中,根据1993年美国胸科学会(ATS)指南,对262例住院CAP患者采用针对病原体的治疗(PDT)方法与经验性广谱抗生素治疗(EAT)策略进行了比较。临床疗效主要由住院时间(LOS)确定。临床疗效的次要结局参数包括抗生素治疗失败的评估、30天死亡率、抗生素治疗持续时间、发热消退情况、副作用和生活质量。

结果

303例患者纳入研究;41例被排除,262例有可供分析的结果。两个治疗组在住院时间、30天死亡率、临床失败或发热消退方面未发现显著差异。副作用虽然对结局参数没有显著影响,但在EAT组患者中比PDT组更频繁出现(60%对17%,95%CI -0.5至-0.3;p<0.001)。

结论

对于住院CAP患者,使用广谱抗生素的EAT策略与PDT方法具有相当的临床疗效。

相似文献

1
Comparison between pathogen directed antibiotic treatment and empirical broad spectrum antibiotic treatment in patients with community acquired pneumonia: a prospective randomised study.社区获得性肺炎患者中病原体导向性抗生素治疗与经验性广谱抗生素治疗的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Thorax. 2005 Aug;60(8):672-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.030411.
2
Early switch to oral antibiotics and early discharge guidelines in the management of community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎管理中早期改用口服抗生素及早期出院指南
Respirology. 2007 Jan;12(1):111-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00931.x.
3
Prospective, randomised study to compare empirical treatment versus targeted treatment on the basis of the urine antigen results in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia.前瞻性、随机研究,旨在比较基于尿抗原检测结果的经验性治疗与靶向治疗对住院社区获得性肺炎患者的疗效。
Thorax. 2010 Feb;65(2):101-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.118588. Epub 2009 Aug 23.
4
Tailored interventions to improve antibiotic use for lower respiratory tract infections in hospitals: a cluster-randomized, controlled trial.针对改善医院下呼吸道感染抗生素使用情况的定制干预措施:一项整群随机对照试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Apr 1;44(7):931-41. doi: 10.1086/512193. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
5
[Medical outcomes and antimicrobial compliance according to the Chilean Society of Respiratory Diseases guidelines for hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia].[根据智利呼吸病学会社区获得性肺炎住院患者指南得出的医疗结果及抗菌药物依从性]
Rev Med Chil. 2003 Aug;131(8):847-56.
6
The etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in Australia: why penicillin plus doxycycline or a macrolide is the most appropriate therapy.澳大利亚社区获得性肺炎的病因:为何青霉素加强力霉素或大环内酯类药物是最恰当的治疗方法。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 May 15;46(10):1513-21. doi: 10.1086/586749.
7
Addition of macrolide in treating adult hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia.大环内酯类药物在治疗成人住院社区获得性肺炎中的应用
Respirology. 2005 Jun;10(3):371-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2005.00704.x.
8
Empiric treatment in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia. Impact on mortality, length of stay and re-admission.住院社区获得性肺炎的经验性治疗。对死亡率、住院时间和再入院的影响。
Respir Med. 2007 Sep;101(9):1909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.04.018. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
9
Safety and efficacy of CURB65-guided antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia.CURB65 指导下的抗生素治疗在社区获得性肺炎中的安全性和疗效。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Feb;66(2):416-23. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq426. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
10
Does sputum culture affect the management and/or outcome of community-acquired pneumonia?痰培养是否会影响社区获得性肺炎的管理和/或结局?
East Mediterr Health J. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(4):792-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospitalization due to pneumonia in Australia, England, and Wales: An ecological cross-sectional study.澳大利亚、英格兰和威尔士因肺炎住院情况:一项生态横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 11;104(15):e42163. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042163.
2
Multiplex PCR Pneumonia Panel in Critically Ill Patients Did Not Modify Mortality: A Cohort Study.重症患者多重PCR肺炎检测组未改变死亡率:一项队列研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;14(3):245. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030245.
3
The Adequacy of Current Legionnaires' Disease Diagnostic Practices in Capturing the Epidemiology of Clinically Relevant : A Scoping Review.当前军团病诊断方法在把握临床相关流行病学方面的充分性:一项范围综述
Pathogens. 2024 Oct 1;13(10):857. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13100857.
4
Practicing Medicine Wisely: Routine Use of Urine Legionella in Suspicious Pneumonia - Are we Overdoing?明智行医:在可疑肺炎中常规使用尿液嗜肺军团菌检测——我们是否做得过头了?
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2024 May 31;62(274):411-413. doi: 10.31729/jnma.8621.
5
Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.重症患者抗生素处方指南
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug;28(Suppl 2):S104-S216. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24677. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
6
Guideline-Concordant Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Hospitalized Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.住院患者社区获得性肺炎的指南一致性治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 15;11(7):ofae336. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae336. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Optimizing Diagnosis and Management of Community-acquired Pneumonia in the Emergency Department.优化急诊科社区获得性肺炎的诊断和管理。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2024 May;42(2):231-247. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
8
Rapid Progression of Aortitis Caused by Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus in a Patient With Pneumonia: A Case Report.肺炎患者中由甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌引起的主动脉炎快速进展:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Feb 22;16(2):e54674. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54674. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Diagnosis and Therapy of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Observational Study and Medical Audit.急诊科社区获得性肺炎的诊断与治疗:一项回顾性观察研究及医疗审核
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 19;13(2):574. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020574.
10
Therapeutical strategies in cavitary legionnaires' disease, two cases from the field and a systematic review.空洞性军团病的治疗策略:来自现场的两例病例和系统评价。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2023 Nov 29;22(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12941-023-00652-5.

本文引用的文献

1
PNEUMOCOCCAL BACTEREMIA WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO BACTEREMIC PNEUMOCOCCAL PNEUMONIA.肺炎球菌血症,特别是关于菌血症性肺炎球菌肺炎
Ann Intern Med. 1964 May;60:759-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-60-5-759.
2
Comparison of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae susceptibilities from community-acquired respiratory tract infections and hospitalized patients with pneumonia: five-year results for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.社区获得性呼吸道感染及住院肺炎患者中肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌药敏性比较:哨兵抗菌监测计划五年结果
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Aug;46(4):285-9. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00087-7.
3
Initial risk class and length of hospital stay in community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎的初始风险分级与住院时长
Eur Respir J. 2001 Jul;18(1):151-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.01.00090001.
4
Etiology, reasons for hospitalization, risk classes, and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia in patients hospitalized on the basis of conventional admission criteria.基于传统入院标准住院的社区获得性肺炎患者的病因、住院原因、风险等级及预后
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Jul 15;33(2):158-65. doi: 10.1086/321808. Epub 2001 Jun 15.
5
Guidelines for the management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Diagnosis, assessment of severity, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention.成人社区获得性肺炎管理指南。诊断、严重程度评估、抗菌治疗及预防
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;163(7):1730-54. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.at1010.
6
Study of community acquired pneumonia aetiology (SCAPA) in adults admitted to hospital: implications for management guidelines.住院成人社区获得性肺炎病因学研究(SCAPA):对管理指南的影响
Thorax. 2001 Apr;56(4):296-301. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.4.296.
7
Early discharge of infected patients through appropriate antibiotic use.通过合理使用抗生素实现感染患者的早期出院。
Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jan 8;161(1):61-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.1.61.
8
Prospective study of the usefulness of sputum Gram stain in the initial approach to community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization.痰革兰氏染色在需要住院治疗的社区获得性肺炎初始诊断中的应用前瞻性研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Oct;31(4):869-74. doi: 10.1086/318151. Epub 2000 Oct 12.
9
Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America.成人社区获得性肺炎管理实践指南。美国传染病学会。
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):347-82. doi: 10.1086/313954. Epub 2000 Sep 7.
10
Prospective study of prognostic factors in community-acquired bacteremic pneumococcal disease in 5 countries.5个国家社区获得性菌血症性肺炎球菌疾病预后因素的前瞻性研究
J Infect Dis. 2000 Sep;182(3):840-7. doi: 10.1086/315760. Epub 2000 Aug 17.