Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚社区获得性肺炎的病因:为何青霉素加强力霉素或大环内酯类药物是最恰当的治疗方法。

The etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in Australia: why penicillin plus doxycycline or a macrolide is the most appropriate therapy.

作者信息

Charles Patrick G P, Whitby Michael, Fuller Andrew J, Stirling Robert, Wright Alistair A, Korman Tony M, Holmes Peter W, Christiansen Keryn J, Waterer Grant W, Pierce Robert J P, Mayall Barrie C, Armstrong John G, Catton Michael G, Nimmo Graeme R, Johnson Barbara, Hooy Michelle, Grayson M L

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2008 May 15;46(10):1513-21. doi: 10.1086/586749.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Available data on the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Australia are very limited. Local treatment guidelines promote the use of combination therapy with agents such as penicillin or amoxycillin combined with either doxycycline or a macrolide.

METHODS

The Australian CAP Study (ACAPS) was a prospective, multicenter study of 885 episodes of CAP in which all patients underwent detailed assessment for bacterial and viral pathogens (cultures, urinary antigen testing, serological methods, and polymerase chain reaction). Antibiotic agents and relevant clinical outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The etiology was identified in 404 (45.6%) of 885 episodes, with the most frequent causes being Streptococcus pneumoniae (14%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (9%), and respiratory viruses (15%; influenza, picornavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and adenovirus). Antibiotic-resistant pathogens were rare: only 5.4% of patients had an infection for which therapy with penicillin plus doxycycline would potentially fail. Concordance with local antibiotic recommendations was high (82.4%), with the most commonly prescribed regimens being a penicillin plus either doxycycline or a macrolide (55.8%) or ceftriaxone plus either doxycycline or a macrolide (36.8%). The 30-day mortality rate was 5.6% (50 of 885 episodes), and mechanical ventilation or vasopressor support were required in 94 episodes (10.6%). Outcomes were not compromised by receipt of narrower-spectrum beta-lactams, and they did not differ on the basis of whether a pathogen was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of patients with CAP can be treated successfully with narrow-spectrum beta-lactam treatment, such as penicillin combined with doxycycline or a macrolide. Greater use of such therapy could potentially reduce the emergence of antibiotic resistance among common bacterial pathogens.

摘要

背景

澳大利亚社区获得性肺炎(CAP)病因的现有数据非常有限。当地治疗指南提倡使用联合疗法,如青霉素或阿莫西林与多西环素或大环内酯类药物联合使用。

方法

澳大利亚CAP研究(ACAPS)是一项对885例CAP病例进行的前瞻性多中心研究,所有患者均接受了针对细菌和病毒病原体的详细评估(培养、尿抗原检测、血清学方法和聚合酶链反应)。记录了抗生素药物及相关临床结果。

结果

在885例病例中,404例(45.6%)明确了病因,最常见的病因是肺炎链球菌(14%)、肺炎支原体(9%)和呼吸道病毒(15%;流感病毒、微小核糖核酸病毒、呼吸道合胞病毒、副流感病毒和腺病毒)。耐药病原体很少见:只有5.4%的患者感染了使用青霉素加四环素治疗可能无效的病原体。与当地抗生素推荐的一致性很高(82.4%),最常用的治疗方案是青霉素加四环素或大环内酯类药物(55.8%)或头孢曲松加四环素或大环内酯类药物(36.8%)。30天死亡率为5.6%(885例中有50例),94例(10.6%)需要机械通气或血管活性药物支持。接受窄谱β-内酰胺类药物治疗并未影响预后,且无论是否鉴定出病原体,预后均无差异。

结论

绝大多数CAP患者可以通过窄谱β-内酰胺类药物治疗成功,如青霉素联合多西环素或大环内酯类药物。更多地使用此类疗法可能会减少常见细菌病原体中抗生素耐药性的出现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验