Tobias Joseph D, Grindstaff Ryan
Departments of Pediatrics and Anesthesiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 665212, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;20(4):233-7. doi: 10.1177/0885066605276806.
Bispectral index (BIS) values were prospectively recorded in pediatric intensive care unit patients receiving continuous infusion of a neuromuscular blocking agent. Sedation was provided by a continuous infusion of midazolam or propofol. The BIS number was recorded by a bedside computer every 10 seconds but was concealed from health care workers. BIS values were recorded for 476 hours (161 893 BIS values) in 12 patients. The BIS number was 50 to 70, 57% of the time; < or =49, 35% of the time; and > or =71, 8% of the time. When supplemental doses of sedatives were administered, the BIS number was >70, 64% of the time; 50 to 70, 31% of the time; and < or =49, 5% of the time. Oversedation was more likely with propofol than midazolam. During the use of neuromuscular blocking agents, oversedation is a common occurrence. Physiologic parameters are not an accurate means of assessing the depth of sedation.
前瞻性记录了在儿科重症监护病房接受神经肌肉阻滞剂持续输注的患者的脑电双频指数(BIS)值。通过持续输注咪达唑仑或丙泊酚进行镇静。床边计算机每10秒记录一次BIS数值,但对医护人员保密。对12例患者记录了476小时的BIS值(161893个BIS数值)。BIS数值在50至70之间的时间占57%;≤49的时间占35%;≥71的时间占8%。当给予补充剂量的镇静剂时,BIS数值>70的时间占64%;50至70的时间占31%;≤49的时间占5%。与咪达唑仑相比,丙泊酚导致过度镇静的可能性更大。在使用神经肌肉阻滞剂期间,过度镇静很常见。生理参数不是评估镇静深度的准确方法。