Uhlin Fredrik, Fridolin Ivo, Lindberg Lars-Göran, Magnusson Martin
Department of Nephrology, University Hospital, Linköping, S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Nov;20(11):2458-64. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi026. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
Dialysate-based, on-line measurements of Kt/V and protein catabolic rate (PCR) in dialysis patients have been considered more accurate compared with measurements on the blood side during dialysis. The primary aim of this study was to compare total removed urea (TRU) and PCR, normalized to body weight (nPCRw), obtained by three dialysate-based methods: (i) on-line ultraviolet (UV) absorbance of the spent dialysate; (ii) total dialysate collection (TDC), as reference method; and (iii) Urea Monitor 1000 (UM) from Baxter Healthcare Corp.
We studied 10 uraemic patients on chronic, thrice-weekly haemodialysis. We made absorption measurements (UV radiation) on-line with a spectrophotometer connected to the fluid outlet of the dialysis machine, with all spent dialysate passing through an optical cuvette for single-wavelength measurements. UV absorbance measurements were compared with TDC and the UM.
nPCRw obtained with UV absorbance was 0.82+/-0.17, that from TDC 0.81+/-0.18, and that measured by UM 0.87+/-0.18, which was significantly higher than the results of the other methods. The difference between nPCRw calculated by TDC and by UM was -0.05+/-0.06, showing a slightly lower SD than the difference between nPCRw by TDC and UV absorbance, -0.01+/-0.07.
The study demonstrates that TRU, and consequently PCR, can be estimated by on-line measurement of the UV absorption in the spent dialysate.
与透析期间血侧测量相比,基于透析液的透析患者Kt/V和蛋白质分解代谢率(PCR)在线测量被认为更准确。本研究的主要目的是比较通过三种基于透析液的方法获得的总尿素清除量(TRU)和标准化体重的PCR(nPCRw):(i)用过的透析液的在线紫外线(UV)吸光度;(ii)总透析液收集(TDC),作为参考方法;以及(iii)百特医疗保健公司的尿素监测仪1000(UM)。
我们研究了10例接受慢性每周三次血液透析的尿毒症患者。我们使用连接到透析机流体出口的分光光度计在线进行吸收测量(紫外线辐射),所有用过的透析液都通过一个光学比色皿进行单波长测量。将紫外线吸光度测量结果与TDC和UM进行比较。
通过紫外线吸光度获得的nPCRw为0.82±0.17,TDC获得的为0.81±0.18,UM测量的为0.87±0.18,后者显著高于其他方法的结果。TDC和UM计算的nPCRw之间的差异为-0.05±0.06,标准差略低于TDC和紫外线吸光度计算的nPCRw之间的差异,即-0.01±0.07。
该研究表明,可以通过在线测量用过的透析液中的紫外线吸收来估计TRU,进而估计PCR。