Swenson Jana M, Tenover Fred C
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop G08, 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Aug;43(8):3818-23. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.8.3818-3823.2005.
The cefoxitin disk diffusion (DD) test for predicting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in staphylococci was assessed during a three-phase study. In phase 1, one laboratory tested 62 and 53 strains of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), respectively. These data were used to choose the provisional cefoxitin DD breakpoints (resistant/susceptible) of < or =19 mm/> or =20 mm for S. aureus and < or =24 mm/> or =25 mm for CoNS for the next phase of testing. In phase 2, 10 laboratories each tested approximately 40 in-house strains of staphylococci (half of which were S. aureus) using Mueller-Hinton agar from different manufacturers. In this phase, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of the cefoxitin disk test were 98 and 100% for S. aureus and 99 and 96% for CoNS. The cefoxitin DD test performed equivalently to oxacillin broth microdilution (BMD) and to oxacillin DD tests among S. aureus and mecA-positive CoNS strains but gave better results than oxacillin BMD or oxacillin DD for mecA-negative strains of CoNS. The cefoxitin DD test also was much easier to read and did not require the use of transmitted light for detection of resistance. Based on data from the first two phases, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly NCCLS) adopted the use of the cefoxitin DD test for predicting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in staphylococci and revised Table 2C in CLSI document M100-S14 to reflect the change. In the third phase, an additional 61 challenge strains of CoNS for which the oxacillin MICs were 0.5 to 2 microg/ml were tested in a single laboratory to determine the effectiveness of the cefoxitin DD test for this group of borderline-resistant isolates. These data were used to refine the description of the test in CLSI document M100-S15. The cefoxitin DD test is preferred over the oxacillin DD test for predicting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in S. aureus and CoNS.
在一项分三个阶段的研究中,对用于预测葡萄球菌中mecA介导的苯唑西林耐药性的头孢西丁纸片扩散(DD)试验进行了评估。在第一阶段,一个实验室分别检测了62株金黄色葡萄球菌和53株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)。这些数据被用于选择头孢西丁DD的临时断点(耐药/敏感),即金黄色葡萄球菌为≤19 mm/>或 =20 mm,CoNS为≤24 mm/>或 =25 mm,用于下一阶段的检测。在第二阶段,10个实验室各自使用来自不同厂家的穆勒-欣顿琼脂检测了约40株内部葡萄球菌(其中一半为金黄色葡萄球菌)。在此阶段,头孢西丁纸片试验对金黄色葡萄球菌的敏感性和特异性分别为98%和100%,对CoNS分别为99%和96%。在金黄色葡萄球菌和mecA阳性CoNS菌株中,头孢西丁DD试验与苯唑西林肉汤微量稀释(BMD)试验以及苯唑西林DD试验的效果相当,但对于mecA阴性的CoNS菌株,其结果优于苯唑西林BMD或苯唑西林DD试验。头孢西丁DD试验也更易于判读,且检测耐药性时无需使用透射光。基于前两个阶段的数据,临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI;原NCCLS)采用头孢西丁DD试验来预测葡萄球菌中mecA介导的苯唑西林耐药性,并修订了CLSI文件M100-S14中的表2C以反映这一变化。在第三阶段,在一个实验室中对另外61株苯唑西林MIC为0.5至2 μg/ml的CoNS挑战菌株进行了检测,以确定头孢西丁DD试验对这组临界耐药分离株的有效性。这些数据被用于完善CLSI文件M100-S15中对该试验的描述。在预测金黄色葡萄球菌和CoNS中mecA介导的苯唑西林耐药性方面,头孢西丁DD试验优于苯唑西林DD试验。