Yen David
Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Iowa Orthop J. 2005;25:141-4.
Some investigators have reported incomplete data when using isokinetic testing as a means of analyzing shoulder strength after rotator cuff repair. An explanation provided has been that the subjects could not reach the speed at which the machine was set. The purpose of this study was to determine if strength data could be generated for all motions being tested by using not only the one or two speeds employed by others, but three speeds across the spectrum of those available. Inclusion criteria were a minimum of two years since surgery with a normal contralateral shoulder. All eligible subjects had isokinetic testing of the non-operated shoulder followed by the operated shoulder, in flexion, abduction and external rotation, tested at 60 degrees, 120 degrees and 180 degrees per second. Fourteen patients were eligible and tested. Isokinetic data showed deficiencies in strength in the operated shoulder compared to the opposite side for abduction, external rotation and flexion of 14%, 27% and 20% respectively. In 10/123 (8%) of the tests, the patients could not reach the preset velocity to yield valid data. One patient could not place and maintain the operated arm in the test position of 90 degrees of shoulder abduction. There was a significant deficiency in abduction at only one of three speeds. This study confirms that isokinetic testing is a powerful tool that lends itself well to producing objective data on shoulder strength after rotator cuff repair, but it also has the limitation that some patients cannot reach the preset velocity for some motions, or place and maintain the operated arm in the test position for the movements being tested. Therefore, to optimize the chances of obtaining isokinetic data for all movements after rotator cuff repair, we suggest using speeds for all motions and consideration of scapular, frontal and sagittal planes for testing.
一些研究者报告称,在使用等速测试作为分析肩袖修复术后肩部力量的方法时,数据并不完整。对此给出的一种解释是,受试者无法达到机器设定的速度。本研究的目的是确定,是否不仅可以通过使用其他人采用的一两种速度,而且还可以通过使用所有可用速度范围内的三种速度,来生成所有测试动作的力量数据。纳入标准为术后至少两年且对侧肩部正常。所有符合条件的受试者先对未手术侧肩部进行等速测试,然后对手术侧肩部进行测试,测试动作包括前屈、外展和外旋,测试速度分别为每秒60度、120度和180度。14名患者符合条件并接受了测试。等速数据显示,与对侧相比,手术侧肩部在外展、外旋和前屈时的力量分别有不足(分别为14%、27%和20%)。在123次测试中的10次(8%)中,患者无法达到预设速度以产生有效数据。一名患者无法将手术侧手臂放置并保持在肩部外展90度的测试位置。在三种速度中,只有一种速度下外展存在显著不足。本研究证实,等速测试是一种强大的工具,非常适合用于生成肩袖修复术后肩部力量的客观数据,但它也有局限性,即一些患者无法达到某些动作的预设速度,或者无法将手术侧手臂放置并保持在测试动作的测试位置。因此,为了优化获得肩袖修复术后所有动作等速数据的机会,我们建议对所有动作使用不同速度,并考虑在肩胛、额状面和矢状面进行测试。