Haddad M C, Sharif H S, Shahed M S, Mutaiery M A, Samihan A M, Sammak B M, Southcombe L A, Crawford A D
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Imaging, Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital, Saudi Arabia.
Radiology. 1992 Jul;184(1):83-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1609107.
To assess whether ultrasonography (US) with or without plain abdominal radiography (kidney, ureter, bladder [KUB] radiography) can replace intravenous urography (IVU) in detection of acute urinary tract obstruction, 101 consecutive patients with renal colic were evaluated with US followed immediately by IVU. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for US diagnosis of acute urinary tract obstruction yielded sensitivities of 91% and 92% for two reviewers at a specificity of 90%. There was no statistically significant difference between US and IVU results. When US was combined with KUB radiography, ROC curves yielded sensitivities of 94% and 97% for two reviewers at a specificity of 90%.KUB radiography alone was of limited diagnostic value. For US alone, no false-positive results occurred, and the false-negative results (n = 9 and n = 6 for two reviewers) were encountered in cases of grade 1 hydronephrosis and nondilated obstructive uropathy. The authors conclude that US combined with KUB radiography can replace IVU in initial evaluation and follow-up of the great majority of patients with renal colic.
为评估超声检查(US)联合或不联合腹部平片(肾脏、输尿管、膀胱[KUB]平片)在检测急性尿路梗阻方面是否可替代静脉肾盂造影(IVU),对101例连续性肾绞痛患者先进行US检查,随后立即进行IVU检查。两位阅片者对US诊断急性尿路梗阻的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线在特异性为90%时,灵敏度分别为91%和92%。US与IVU结果之间无统计学显著差异。当US联合KUB平片时,两位阅片者的ROC曲线在特异性为90%时,灵敏度分别为94%和97%。单独的KUB平片诊断价值有限。仅US检查未出现假阳性结果,假阴性结果(两位阅片者分别为9例和6例)出现在1级肾积水和非扩张性梗阻性尿路病病例中。作者得出结论,US联合KUB平片可替代IVU对绝大多数肾绞痛患者进行初始评估和随访。