Gorelik U, Ulish Y, Yagil Y
Department of Urology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel.
Urology. 1996 May;47(5):637-42. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00009-x.
This study reviews the rate at which diagnostic imaging techniques are used in patients with intractable flank pain attributed to renal colic who are admitted to the hospital through the emergency room and determines the diagnostic values of plain film of the abdomen {kidney, ureter, bladder [KUB]} and of ultrasonography (US) of the urinary tract, using intravenous urography (IVU) as the gold standard for establishing the presence of a calculus.
We reviewed the medical records of 288 patients who were admitted to our medical center over a period of 5 consecutive years for intractable flank pain, the admission and working diagnosis in all cases being that of renal colic, and we retrieved all data pertaining to their diagnostic evaluation.
A total of 265 patients (92%) were subjected to KUB, 158 (55%) to IVU, and 135 (45%) to US of the renal-urinary tract. Two diagnostic imaging techniques were used in the same patient in the following combinations: KUB and IVU in 146 patients (51%), KUB and US in 110 (38%), and IVU and US in 60 (21%). Three imaging techniques (IVU, KUB, and US) were utilized in 54 patients (19%). The sensitivity and specificity of KUB alone were 95% and 65%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 82% and 88%. The sensitivity of US alone was 93%, its specificity 83%, the positive predictive value 93%, and the negative predictive value 83%. The sensitivity of combined KUB and US (requiring both tests to be positive for diagnosing the presence of a calculus) was 89%, the specificity 100%, the positive predictive value 100%, and the negative predictive value 81%.
Our data indicate that combining US with KUB provides the best diagnostic algorithm that approaches the yield of IVU in excluding the presence of a calculus in the renal-urinary tract in patients who present with intractable flank pain.
本研究回顾了因肾绞痛导致顽固性胁腹痛并通过急诊入院的患者中诊断性成像技术的使用频率,并以静脉肾盂造影(IVU)作为确定结石存在的金标准,确定腹部平片(肾脏、输尿管、膀胱[KUB])和尿路超声检查(US)的诊断价值。
我们回顾了连续5年入住我们医疗中心的288例因顽固性胁腹痛入院患者的病历,所有病例的入院和初步诊断均为肾绞痛,并检索了所有与他们诊断评估相关的数据。
共有265例患者(92%)接受了KUB检查,158例(55%)接受了IVU检查,135例(45%)接受了肾-尿路超声检查。同一患者使用了以下组合的两种诊断成像技术:146例患者(51%)接受了KUB和IVU检查,110例(38%)接受了KUB和US检查,60例(21%)接受了IVU和US检查。54例患者(19%)使用了三种成像技术(IVU、KUB和US)。单独KUB的敏感性和特异性分别为95%和65%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为82%和88%。单独US的敏感性为93%,特异性为83%,阳性预测值为93%,阴性预测值为83%。联合KUB和US(两种检查均为阳性才能诊断结石存在)的敏感性为89%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为81%。
我们的数据表明,对于出现顽固性胁腹痛的患者,将US与KUB结合使用可提供最佳诊断算法,其在排除肾-尿路结石存在方面的诊断效果接近IVU。