Geraerts Elke, Smeets Elke, Jelicic Marko, van Heerden Jaap, Merckelbach Harald
Department of Neurocognition, University of Maastricht, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Conscious Cogn. 2005 Sep;14(3):602-12. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.01.006.
Extending a strategy previously used by , we administered a neutral and a trauma-related version of the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm to a sample of women reporting recovered (n=23) or repressed memories (n=16) of childhood sexual abuse (CSA), women reporting having always remembered their abuse (n=55), and women reporting no history of abuse (n=20). We found that individuals reporting recovered memories of CSA are more prone than other participants to falsely recalling and recognizing neutral words that were never presented. Moreover, our study is the first to show that this finding even held when trauma-related material was involved. Correlational analyses revealed that fantasy proneness, but not self-reported traumatic experiences and dissociative symptoms were related to false recall and false recognition.
我们采用了 之前使用过的一种策略，对一组女性样本进行了中性版和与创伤相关版的迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特范式测试。这些女性样本包括报告童年性虐待（CSA）记忆已恢复的女性（n = 23）或被压抑记忆的女性（n = 16）、报告一直记得自己遭受虐待的女性（n = 55）以及报告无虐待史的女性（n = 20）。我们发现，报告CSA记忆已恢复的个体比其他参与者更容易错误回忆和识别从未呈现过的中性词。此外，我们的研究首次表明，即使涉及与创伤相关的材料，这一发现仍然成立。相关分析显示，易幻想倾向与错误回忆和错误识别有关，而自我报告的创伤经历和解离症状则与之无关。
