Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2010 Oct;38(7):833-48. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.7.833.
This article reviews research using the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) associative memory illusion, whereby people falsely remember words that were not presented. This illusion has broadly influenced basic theories of memory in cognitive psychology and neuroscience and naturally raises the question as to how these theories apply to more complex autobiographical memories. Some applicability is evident from research linking individual differences in the DRM illusion to false autobiographical memories (e.g., misremembering public events) and fantastic autobiographical beliefs (e.g., memories from past lives). But which aspects generalize? Here it is argued that a process-oriented approach is needed in order to answer this question. Many productive years of DRM research indicate that multiple and often opposing psychological processes cause even the most basic false memories. In light of these discoveries, more researchers need to use methods that isolate these component processes if the goal is to understand false memories both in the lab and in life.
本文回顾了使用 Deese/Roediger-McDermott(DRM)联想记忆错觉的研究,人们会错误地记住那些没有呈现过的单词。这种错觉广泛影响了认知心理学和神经科学中关于记忆的基本理论,自然而然地提出了这些理论如何适用于更复杂的自传体记忆的问题。一些可应用性的研究表明,DRM 错觉的个体差异与虚假的自传体记忆(例如,记错公共事件)和奇幻的自传体信念(例如,前世的记忆)有关。但是哪些方面具有普遍性呢?有人认为,为了回答这个问题,需要采用一种面向过程的方法。DRM 研究的许多富有成效的年份表明,即使是最基本的错误记忆也涉及多种且往往相互矛盾的心理过程。有鉴于这些发现,如果目标是要在实验室和生活中理解错误记忆,那么更多的研究人员需要使用能够分离这些组成过程的方法。