《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本（DSM-III-R）中人格障碍的因素结构：对竞争模型的评估
The factor structure of the DSM-III-R personality disorders: an evaluation of competing models.
作者信息
Rodebaugh Thomas L, Chambless Dianne L, Renneberg Babette, Fydrich Thomas
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Temple University, USA.
出版信息
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005;14(1):43-55. doi: 10.1002/mpr.16.
Abstract
Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test a series of competing models to determine the best way to characterize the factor structure of the DSM-III-R personality disorder scores. Data were collected from 301 clients with a primary diagnosis of anxiety disorder. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) was used to determine Axis I and Axis II diagnoses, and adequate to good reliability was obtained for the number of criteria met for a given personality disorder. Several factor models were tested, including a single-factor model, a three-factor model based on the DSM grouping of odd, dramatic, and anxious personality disorders, and a four-factor model based on normal personality theories. Only the DSM three-factor model received strong and unequivocal support.
摘要
验证性因素分析用于检验一系列相互竞争的模型，以确定表征《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》（DSM-III-R）人格障碍分数的因素结构的最佳方法。数据收集自301名初步诊断为焦虑症的患者。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》的结构化临床访谈（SCID）来确定轴I和轴II诊断，并且对于给定人格障碍满足的标准数量获得了足够至良好的信度。测试了几个因素模型，包括单因素模型、基于DSM对怪异型、戏剧型和焦虑型人格障碍分组的三因素模型，以及基于正常人格理论的四因素模型。只有DSM三因素模型得到了有力且明确的支持。
相似文献
1
The factor structure of the DSM-III-R personality disorders: an evaluation of competing models.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本（DSM-III-R）中人格障碍的因素结构：对竞争模型的评估
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005;14(1):43-55. doi: 10.1002/mpr.16.
2
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
3
Confirmatory factor analysis of the personality disorder subscales from the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems.人际问题量表中人格障碍分量表的验证性因素分析。
J Pers Assess. 1997 Oct;69(2):284-96. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6902_3.
4
Reliability and validity of the Coolidge Axis II Inventory: a new inventory for the assessment of personality disorders.《柯立芝轴II量表的信效度：一种用于评估人格障碍的新量表》
J Pers Assess. 1992 Oct;59(2):223-38. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5902_1.
5
Non-melancholic depression: the contribution of personality, anxiety and life events to subclassification.
Psychol Med. 1998 Sep;28(5):1209-19. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798007107.
6
Taxonic structure of schizotypal personality disorder: a multiple-instrument, multi-sample study based on mixture models.分裂型人格障碍的分类结构：基于混合模型的多工具、多样本研究
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Nov 15;137(1-2):71-85. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.02.008. Epub 2005 Oct 14.
7
Personality disorders in patients with somatisation disorder. A controlled study.躯体化障碍患者的人格障碍。一项对照研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;163:785-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.163.6.785.
8
What should become of depressive personality disorder in DSM-V?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中的抑郁性人格障碍该何去何从？
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2009;17(1):41-59. doi: 10.1080/10673220902735694.
9
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
10
DSM-III-R narcissistic personality disorder evaluated by patients' and informants' self-report questionnaires: relationships with other personality disorders and a sense of entitlement as an indicator of narcissism.通过患者和 informant 的自我报告问卷评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》中的自恋型人格障碍：与其他人格障碍的关系以及作为自恋指标的权利感。 注：这里“informant”不太明确具体准确对应中文的什么词，可根据具体语境调整，比如“提供信息者”等 。
Compr Psychiatry. 1992 Nov-Dec;33(6):397-406. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(92)90062-u.
引用本文的文献
1
The joint structure of DSM-IV Axis I and Axis II disorders.DSM-IV 轴 I 和轴 II 障碍的联合结构。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Feb;120(1):198-209. doi: 10.1037/a0021660.
2
Comparing personality disorder models: cross-method assessment of the FFM and DSM-IV-TR.比较人格障碍模型：FFM 和 DSM-IV-TR 的跨方法评估。
J Pers Disord. 2010 Dec;24(6):721-45. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.6.721.
3
Ten-year stability and latent structure of the DSM-IV schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中分裂型、边缘型、回避型及强迫型人格障碍的十年稳定性及潜在结构
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Aug;118(3):507-19. doi: 10.1037/a0016478.
4
The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for DSM-IV personality disorders: a multivariate twin study.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍的遗传和环境风险因素结构：一项多变量双胞胎研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;65(12):1438-46. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1438.
本文引用的文献
1
Distortions In A Commonly Used Factor Analytic Procedure.常用因子分析程序中的扭曲。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1979 Jul 1;14(3):301-21. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1403_2.
2
Evaluation of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria as assessed by the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV personality disorders.通过《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍结构化临床访谈对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍标准进行评估。
Compr Psychiatry. 2002 Jul-Aug;43(4):285-300. doi: 10.1053/comp.2002.33494.
3
Confirmatory factor analysis of DSM-IV borderline, schizotypal, avoidant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: findings from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中边缘型、分裂型、回避型及强迫型人格障碍的验证性因素分析：来自人格障碍协作纵向研究的结果
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002 Jan;105(1):28-36. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.0_479.x.
4
Differences in DSM-III-R and DSM-IV diagnoses in eating disorder patients.饮食失调患者中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》（DSM-III-R）与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》（DSM-IV）诊断结果的差异。
Compr Psychiatry. 2001 Nov-Dec;42(6):448-55. doi: 10.1053/comp.2001.27896.
5
Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach.使用五因素模型来代表《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中的人格障碍：一种专家共识方法。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Aug;110(3):401-12. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.110.3.401.
6
A psychometric study of DSM-IV passive-aggressive (negativistic) personality disorder criteria.
J Pers Disord. 2000 Spring;14(1):72-83. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.1.72.
7
Rates of personality disorders in substance abusers: a comparison between DSM-III-R and DSM-IV.物质滥用者中人格障碍的发生率：《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本（DSM-III-R）与第四版（DSM-IV）的比较
J Pers Disord. 1999 Winter;13(4):375-84. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1999.13.4.375.
8
Expressed emotion and behavior therapy outcome: a prospective study with obsessive-compulsive and agoraphobic outpatients.情感表达与行为疗法的疗效：一项针对强迫症和广场恐惧症门诊患者的前瞻性研究。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Oct;67(5):658-65. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.5.658.
9
Do personality disorders exist? On the validity of the concept and its cognitive-behavioral formulation and treatment.人格障碍是否存在？关于该概念的有效性及其认知行为学阐释与治疗。
Behav Res Ther. 1999 Jul;37 Suppl 1:S97-134. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00052-2.
10
Personality traits and personality disorders.人格特质与人格障碍。
Br J Psychol. 1998 Nov;89 ( Pt 4):647-61. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02708.x.
Zotero 插件