Suppr超能文献

The factor structure of the DSM-III-R personality disorders: an evaluation of competing models.

作者信息

Rodebaugh Thomas L, Chambless Dianne L, Renneberg Babette, Fydrich Thomas

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Temple University, USA.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005;14(1):43-55. doi: 10.1002/mpr.16.

Abstract

Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test a series of competing models to determine the best way to characterize the factor structure of the DSM-III-R personality disorder scores. Data were collected from 301 clients with a primary diagnosis of anxiety disorder. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) was used to determine Axis I and Axis II diagnoses, and adequate to good reliability was obtained for the number of criteria met for a given personality disorder. Several factor models were tested, including a single-factor model, a three-factor model based on the DSM grouping of odd, dramatic, and anxious personality disorders, and a four-factor model based on normal personality theories. Only the DSM three-factor model received strong and unequivocal support.

摘要

相似文献

1
The factor structure of the DSM-III-R personality disorders: an evaluation of competing models.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005;14(1):43-55. doi: 10.1002/mpr.16.
6
Taxonic structure of schizotypal personality disorder: a multiple-instrument, multi-sample study based on mixture models.
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Nov 15;137(1-2):71-85. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.02.008. Epub 2005 Oct 14.
7
Personality disorders in patients with somatisation disorder. A controlled study.
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;163:785-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.163.6.785.
8
What should become of depressive personality disorder in DSM-V?
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2009;17(1):41-59. doi: 10.1080/10673220902735694.
9

引用本文的文献

1
The joint structure of DSM-IV Axis I and Axis II disorders.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Feb;120(1):198-209. doi: 10.1037/a0021660.
2
Comparing personality disorder models: cross-method assessment of the FFM and DSM-IV-TR.
J Pers Disord. 2010 Dec;24(6):721-45. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.6.721.
4
The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for DSM-IV personality disorders: a multivariate twin study.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;65(12):1438-46. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1438.

本文引用的文献

1
Distortions In A Commonly Used Factor Analytic Procedure.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1979 Jul 1;14(3):301-21. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1403_2.
4
Differences in DSM-III-R and DSM-IV diagnoses in eating disorder patients.
Compr Psychiatry. 2001 Nov-Dec;42(6):448-55. doi: 10.1053/comp.2001.27896.
5
Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Aug;110(3):401-12. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.110.3.401.
6
A psychometric study of DSM-IV passive-aggressive (negativistic) personality disorder criteria.
J Pers Disord. 2000 Spring;14(1):72-83. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.1.72.
7
Rates of personality disorders in substance abusers: a comparison between DSM-III-R and DSM-IV.
J Pers Disord. 1999 Winter;13(4):375-84. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1999.13.4.375.
9
Do personality disorders exist? On the validity of the concept and its cognitive-behavioral formulation and treatment.
Behav Res Ther. 1999 Jul;37 Suppl 1:S97-134. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00052-2.
10
Personality traits and personality disorders.
Br J Psychol. 1998 Nov;89 ( Pt 4):647-61. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02708.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验