• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格特质与人格障碍。

Personality traits and personality disorders.

作者信息

Deary I J, Peter A, Austin E, Gibson G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 1998 Nov;89 ( Pt 4):647-61. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02708.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02708.x
PMID:9854807
Abstract

The structure of personality disorder traits was examined in a sample of 400 undergraduates who completed the personality disorder questionnaire from the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID-II). The relations between personality disorder and normal personality traits indexed by the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) were examined. The three-cluster model of personality traits--as described in the DSM scheme--found equivocal support. Exploratory principal components analysis and confirmatory factor analysis found four broad factors of personality disorder that overlapped with normal personality traits: an asthenic factor related to neuroticism; an antisocial factor associated with psychoticism; an asocial factor linked to introversion-extraversion; and an anankastic (obsessive-compulsive) factor. There is growing agreement about the number and type of broad personality disorder dimensions; similar dimensions may be found in clinical and non-clinical samples, suggesting that those people with personality disorders differ quantitatively rather than qualitatively from others; and there is substantial overlap between normal and abnormal personality dimensions.

摘要

在400名完成了来自《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)中人格障碍问卷的本科生样本中,对人格障碍特质的结构进行了研究。研究了由艾森克人格问卷修订版(EPQ-R)所索引的人格障碍与正常人格特质之间的关系。如《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》方案中所描述的人格特质三聚类模型得到了模棱两可的支持。探索性主成分分析和验证性因素分析发现了四个人格障碍的宽泛因素,它们与正常人格特质重叠:一个与神经质相关的虚弱因素;一个与精神质相关的反社会因素;一个与内向-外向相关的不合群因素;以及一个强迫性(强迫-冲动)因素。关于宽泛人格障碍维度的数量和类型,人们的共识日益增加;在临床和非临床样本中可能会发现类似的维度,这表明人格障碍患者与其他人的差异在于数量而非质量;并且正常和异常人格维度之间存在大量重叠。

相似文献

1
Personality traits and personality disorders.人格特质与人格障碍。
Br J Psychol. 1998 Nov;89 ( Pt 4):647-61. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02708.x.
2
[An exploratory study of a personality disorders questionnaire].[一项人格障碍问卷的探索性研究]
Encephale. 2008 Oct;34(5):517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
3
Relationship between the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire and DSM-III-R personality traits.
Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;151(2):274-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.2.274.
4
Dimensions of personality--relationship between DSM-IV personality disorder symptoms, the five-factor model, and the biosocial model of personality.人格维度——《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍症状、五因素模型与人格生物社会模型之间的关系
J Pers Disord. 2008 Feb;22(1):101-8. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2008.22.1.101.
5
Structure of personality disorders from the perspective of the Revised Neo Personality Inventory domain scales and the Psychopathology-5 Scales.从修订版新人格量表领域量表和精神病理学-5量表的角度看人格障碍的结构
Psychol Rep. 1999 Dec;85(3 Pt 2):1119-22. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1999.85.3f.1119.
6
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
7
The relationship of social anxiety disorder symptoms with probable attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Turkish university students; impact of negative affect and personality traits of neuroticism and extraversion.土耳其大学生社交焦虑障碍症状与可能的注意缺陷多动障碍的关系;负性情绪和神经质、外向性格特质的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Aug;254:158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.039. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
8
DSM-III-R personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: an empirical comparison.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中的人格障碍与人格五因素模型:一项实证比较
J Abnorm Psychol. 1992 Aug;101(3):553-60. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.101.3.553.
9
Factor structure of DSM-III-R personality disorders shown by self-report questionnaire: implications for classifying and assessing personality disorders.自我报告问卷显示的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》(DSM-III-R)人格障碍的因素结构:对人格障碍分类和评估的启示
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Dec;84(6):555-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03194.x.
10
Dimensions of personality pathology.
Can J Psychiatry. 1991 Oct;36(8):557-62. doi: 10.1177/070674379103600802.

引用本文的文献

1
Law Enforcement Officers' Ability to Recognize Emotions: The Role of Personality Traits and Basic Needs' Satisfaction.执法人员识别情绪的能力:人格特质和基本需求满足的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 22;12(10):351. doi: 10.3390/bs12100351.
2
Personality and risk of hospital diagnosed mental disorder: a 35 years' prospective study.人格与医院诊断精神障碍风险:一项 35 年的前瞻性研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;56(11):2073-2081. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-02001-9. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
3
Establishing the Substantive Interpretation of the GFP by Considering Evidence from Research on Personality Disorders and Animal Personality.
通过考量人格障碍研究和动物个性研究的证据来确立绿色荧光蛋白的实质性解释。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 9;8:1771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01771. eCollection 2017.
4
The heritability of Cluster B personality disorders assessed both by personal interview and questionnaire.通过个人访谈和问卷评估的 B 类人格障碍的遗传性。
J Pers Disord. 2012 Dec;26(6):848-66. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.6.848.
5
Personality disorders and traits as predictors of incident cardiovascular disease: findings from the 23-year follow-up of the Baltimore ECA study.人格障碍和特质对心血管疾病发病的预测作用:巴尔的摩 ECA 研究 23 年随访结果。
Psychosomatics. 2010 Jul-Aug;51(4):289-96. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.51.4.289.
6
The factor structure of the DSM-III-R personality disorders: an evaluation of competing models.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中人格障碍的因素结构:对竞争模型的评估
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005;14(1):43-55. doi: 10.1002/mpr.16.
7
Factorial structure of pathological personality as evaluated by peers.由同伴评估的病理性人格的因子结构。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Feb;112(1):81-91.