• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转移性癌症患者居家返院的护理协调实验系统:全科医生调查。

Experimental system of care coordination for the home return of patients with metastatic cancer: a survey of general practitioners.

机构信息

Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale - Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 133 Route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse Cedex, France.

Faculté de médecine, CERPOP - UMR 1295 INSERM - Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 37 allées Jules Guesde -, 31000, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2022 Nov 17;23(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01891-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-022-01891-9
PMID:36396990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9673376/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To promote improved coordination between general practice and hospital, the French clinical trial CREDO ("Concertation de REtour à DOmicile") is testing an innovative experimental consultation for patients with metastatic cancer who are returning home. This consultation involves the patient, the patient's referring GP (GP) and a GP with specific skills in oncology (GP) in a specialized care center. The objective of our study is to explore the satisfaction of GPs about this consultation, in the phase of interaction between GP and GP.

METHODS

This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study explored the satisfaction of GPs who had participated in this type of consultation, via a telephone survey.

RESULTS

One Hundred GPs responded to the questionnaire between April and September 2019 (overall response rate: 55%). 84.5% were satisfied with the consultation, and the majority were satisfied with its methods. Half of the GPs learned new information during the consultation, three-quarters noted an impact on their practice, and 94.4% thought that this type of coordination between the GP and the oncology specialist could improve general practice - hospital coordination.

CONCLUSIONS

For GPs, the CREDO consultation seems to be practical and effective in improving the coordination between general medicine and hospital. GPs would benefit from such coordination for all patients with cancer, several times during follow-up and at each occurrence of a medically significant event.

摘要

背景

为了促进全科医学与医院之间更好的协调,法国临床试验 CREDO(“回归家庭的协调”)正在测试一种针对转移性癌症患者的创新实验性咨询,这些患者正在返回家中。该咨询涉及患者、患者的转诊全科医生(GP)和具有肿瘤学专业技能的 GP ,在专门的护理中心进行。我们的研究目的是探讨 GP 对这种咨询的满意度,即 GP 与 GP 之间的互动阶段。

方法

这项观察性、横断面、多中心研究通过电话调查探讨了参与这种咨询的 GP 的满意度。

结果

2019 年 4 月至 9 月期间,有 100 名 GP 回应了问卷(总体回应率:55%)。84.5%的 GP 对咨询感到满意,大多数对咨询方法感到满意。半数 GP 在咨询中获得了新信息,四分之三的 GP 注意到对其实践的影响,94.4%的 GP 认为这种 GP 与肿瘤专家之间的协调可以改善全科医学-医院之间的协调。

结论

对于 GP 来说,CREDO 咨询似乎在改善全科医学与医院之间的协调方面具有实用性和有效性。对于所有癌症患者,GP 都将从这种协调中受益,在随访期间多次发生,并且在每次发生有医学意义的事件时都能受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/9673376/3974255b4e4e/12875_2022_1891_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/9673376/844f0465d696/12875_2022_1891_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/9673376/3974255b4e4e/12875_2022_1891_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/9673376/844f0465d696/12875_2022_1891_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/9673376/3974255b4e4e/12875_2022_1891_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Experimental system of care coordination for the home return of patients with metastatic cancer: a survey of general practitioners.转移性癌症患者居家返院的护理协调实验系统:全科医生调查。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Nov 17;23(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01891-9.
2
Study protocol of the CREDO randomised controlled trial: evaluation of a structured return home consultation for patients suffering from metastaticcancer.研究方案:CREDO 随机对照试验:评估一种结构化的患者回家咨询对转移性癌症患者的效果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):e062219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062219.
3
Home-Based Palliative Care for Children With Incurable Cancer: Long-term Perspectives of and Impact on General Practitioners.为患有不治之症的儿童提供居家姑息治疗:全科医生的长期观点及影响
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Mar;53(3):578-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
4
Palliative care consultations in primary care: a cross-sectional survey among Dutch general practitioners.初级保健中的姑息治疗咨询:荷兰全科医生的横断面调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;9(4):e30. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000967. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
5
Randomised controlled trial protocol (GRIP study): examining the effect of involvement of a general practitioner and home care oncology nurse after a cancer diagnosis on patient reported outcomes and healthcare utilization.随机对照试验方案(GRIP 研究):研究在癌症诊断后,普通医生和家庭癌症护理护士的参与对患者报告的结局和医疗保健利用的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4005-6.
6
Is three a crowd? Impact of the presence of a medical student in the general practice consultation.三人成众?医学生出现在全科医疗会诊中的影响。
Med Educ. 2016 Feb;50(2):225-35. doi: 10.1111/medu.12935.
7
[Ability of French General Practitioners to detect common mental disorders identified using the Patient Health Questionnaire: Has this changed with the introduction of gatekeeping and registration with a chosen doctor?].[法国全科医生识别使用患者健康问卷确定的常见精神障碍的能力:随着守门人制度的引入以及选择医生进行注册,这种能力有变化吗?]
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
8
Assessment of the interest of the geriatric oncology consultation among French general practitioners.法国全科医生对老年肿瘤学会诊的兴趣评估。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2016 Jan;7(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2015.10.184. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
9
Pre-return to work consultation and therapeutic part-time work: Cross-sectional study on level of knowledge and use by general practitioners in France.重返工作前咨询和治疗性兼职工作:法国全科医生知识水平和使用情况的横断面研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2021 Dec;27(1):158-165. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1948007.
10
Availability of Dutch General Practitioners for After-Hours Palliative Care.荷兰全科医生提供非工作时间姑息治疗的情况。
J Palliat Care. 2018 Jul;33(3):182-186. doi: 10.1177/0825859718766947. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing challenges of general practitioner-oncologist interaction in end-of-life communication: a qualitative study.临终沟通中全科医生与肿瘤学家互动面临的挑战日益增加:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 20;24(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01690-w.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the evidence behind cancer care reviews, a primary care cancer support tool? A scoping review.癌症护理评估作为一种初级保健癌症支持工具的依据是什么?一项范围综述。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Dec;17(6):1780-1798. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01251-7. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Adapting patients' oncological treatment through remote participation of general practitioners in multi-disciplinary consultation meetings: A feasibility study.通过全科医生远程参与多学科会诊来调整患者的肿瘤治疗:一项可行性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):15-22. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2021.2003775.
3
Effects of a time out consultation with the general practitioner on cancer treatment decision-making: a randomised controlled trial: Time out with the general practitioner and cancer treatment decision.
与全科医生进行暂停咨询对癌症治疗决策的影响:一项随机对照试验:与全科医生进行暂停咨询和癌症治疗决策。
Psychooncology. 2021 Apr;30(4):571-580. doi: 10.1002/pon.5604. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
4
Inventory of tools for care coordination between general practice and hospital system for patients suffering from cancer in active phase of treatment: A scoping review.癌症治疗活跃期患者的全科医疗与医院系统之间的护理协调工具清单:范围综述。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020 Nov;29(6):e13319. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13319. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
Improving communication between the general practitioner and the oncologist: a key role in coordinating care for patients suffering from cancer.提高全科医生和肿瘤医生之间的沟通:协调癌症患者护理的关键角色。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06993-0.
6
General practitioners' participation in cancer treatment in Norway.挪威全科医生参与癌症治疗的情况。
Rural Remote Health. 2018 May;18(2):4276. doi: 10.22605/RRH4276. Epub 2018 May 23.
7
Systematic review of the effectiveness, barriers and facilitators to general practitioner engagement with specialist secondary services in integrated palliative care.综合姑息治疗中全科医生参与专科二级服务的有效性、障碍及促进因素的系统评价
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Dec;8(4):385-399. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001125. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
8
Coordination of cancer care between family physicians and cancer specialists: Importance of communication.家庭医生与癌症专科医生之间的癌症护理协调:沟通的重要性。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):e608-e615.
9
The primary care provider (PCP)-cancer specialist relationship: A systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis.初级保健提供者(PCP)与癌症专科医生的关系:一项系统评价与混合方法的元综合分析。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):156-169. doi: 10.3322/caac.21385. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
10
What role does the general practitioner in France play among cancer patients during the initial treatment phase with intravenous chemotherapy? A qualitative study.在法国,全科医生在癌症患者静脉化疗初始治疗阶段扮演着怎样的角色?一项定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2016 Jun;22(2):96-102. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1126821. Epub 2016 Jan 22.