• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听觉干扰序列会影响自定节奏的敲击吗?

Does an auditory distractor sequence affect self-paced tapping?

作者信息

Repp Bruno H

机构信息

Haskins Laboratories, 300 George Street, New Haven, CT 06511-6624, USA.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Jan;121(1):81-107. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.006. Epub 2005 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.006
PMID:16098944
Abstract

This study investigated whether an auditory distractor (D) sequence affects the timing of self-paced finger tapping. To begin with, Experiment 1 replicated earlier findings by showing that, when taps are synchronized with an isochronous auditory target (T) sequence, an isochronous D sequence of different tempo and pitch systematically modulates the tap timing. The extent of the modulation depended on the relative intensity of the T and D tones, but not on their pitch distance. Experiment 2 then used a synchronization-continuation paradigm in which D sequences of different tempi were introduced only during continuation tapping. Although the D sequences rarely captured the taps completely, they did increase the tapping variability and deviations from the correct tempo. Furthermore, they eliminated the negative correlation between successive inter-tap intervals and led to intermittent phase locking when the tapping period was close to the period of the D sequence. These distractor effects occurred regardless of whether or not the taps generated auditory feedback tones. The distractor effects thus depend neither on the intention to synchronize with a T sequence nor on the simultaneous perception of two auditory sequences. Rather, they seem to reflect a basic attraction of rhythmic movement to auditory rhythms.

摘要

本研究调查了听觉干扰(D)序列是否会影响自主节奏的手指敲击的时间。首先,实验1重复了早期的研究结果,表明当敲击与等时听觉目标(T)序列同步时,不同节奏和音高的等时D序列会系统地调节敲击时间。调节的程度取决于T音和D音的相对强度,而不是它们的音高距离。然后,实验2使用了同步 - 延续范式,其中仅在延续敲击期间引入不同节奏的D序列。虽然D序列很少能完全捕捉到敲击,但它们确实增加了敲击的变异性以及与正确节奏的偏差。此外,它们消除了连续敲击间隔之间的负相关,并在敲击周期接近D序列的周期时导致间歇性锁相。无论敲击是否产生听觉反馈音,这些干扰效应都会出现。因此,干扰效应既不依赖于与T序列同步的意图,也不依赖于对两个听觉序列的同时感知。相反,它们似乎反映了有节奏的运动对听觉节奏的一种基本吸引力。

相似文献

1
Does an auditory distractor sequence affect self-paced tapping?听觉干扰序列会影响自定节奏的敲击吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Jan;121(1):81-107. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.006. Epub 2005 Aug 11.
2
On the nature of phase attraction in sensorimotor synchronization with interleaved auditory sequences.关于感觉运动同步中与交错听觉序列的相位吸引的本质。
Hum Mov Sci. 2004 Oct;23(3-4):389-413. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2004.08.014.
3
Auditory dominance in the error correction process: a synchronized tapping study.错误纠正过程中的听觉优势:一项同步敲击研究。
Brain Res. 2006 Apr 21;1084(1):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.019. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
4
Ideomotor effects of pitch on continuation tapping.音高对连续敲击的观念运动效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Feb;64(2):381-93. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.495408. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
5
Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms.与视觉节奏相比,有节奏的运动对听觉节奏的吸引力更强。
Psychol Res. 2004 Aug;68(4):252-70. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0143-8. Epub 2003 Sep 3.
6
Hearing a melody in different ways: multistability of metrical interpretation, reflected in rate limits of sensorimotor synchronization.以不同方式聆听旋律:韵律解读的多稳态,体现在感觉运动同步的速率限制中。
Cognition. 2007 Mar;102(3):434-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
7
Rate limits in sensorimotor synchronization with auditory and visual sequences: the synchronization threshold and the benefits and costs of interval subdivision.与听觉和视觉序列进行感觉运动同步时的速率限制:同步阈值以及间隔细分的益处与成本。
J Mot Behav. 2003 Dec;35(4):355-70. doi: 10.1080/00222890309603156.
8
Auditory imagery shapes movement timing and kinematics: evidence from a musical task.听觉意象塑造运动的时间和运动学:来自音乐任务的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Apr;36(2):508-13. doi: 10.1037/a0017604.
9
The transition from synchronization to continuation tapping.从同步敲击到持续敲击的转变。
Hum Mov Sci. 2005 Aug;24(4):465-83. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.09.005. Epub 2005 Oct 4.
10
Perfect phase correction in synchronization with slow auditory sequences.与缓慢听觉序列同步的完美相位校正。
J Mot Behav. 2008 Sep;40(5):363-7. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.40.5.363-367.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep.Ramp 协议:使用 TeensyStep 揭示个体在跟随听觉节拍行走方面的差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 10;14(1):23779. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72508-7.
2
You, me, and us: Maintaining self-other distinction enhances coordination, agency, and affect.你、我与我们:维持自我与他人的区分可增强协调性、能动性及情感。
iScience. 2023 Oct 28;26(12):108253. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108253. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
3
Effects of interoceptive accuracy on timing control in the synchronization tapping task.
内感受准确性对同步敲击任务中时间控制的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 6;16:907836. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.907836. eCollection 2022.
4
Musical Role Asymmetries in Piano Duet Performance Influence Alpha-Band Neural Oscillation and Behavioral Synchronization.钢琴二重奏表演中的音乐角色不对称影响α波段神经振荡和行为同步。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Oct 15;13:1088. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01088. eCollection 2019.
5
Interpersonal and intrapersonal entrainment of self-paced tapping rate.自我调节敲击率的人际和人际内同步。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 30;14(7):e0220505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220505. eCollection 2019.
6
Cross-feedback with Partner Contributes to Performance Accuracy in Finger-tapping Rhythm Synchronization between One Leader and Two Followers.领导者与两位跟随者之间手指轻敲节奏同步的交叉反馈有助于提高表现准确性。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 24;9(1):7800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43352-x.
7
Robust Temporal Averaging of Time Intervals Between Action and Sensation.动作与感觉之间时间间隔的稳健时间平均法
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 19;10:511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00511. eCollection 2019.
8
The roles of musical expertise and sensory feedback in beat keeping and joint action.音乐专业技能和感官反馈在节拍保持与联合行动中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):419-431. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01156-8. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
9
Effects of metronomic sounds on a self-paced tapping task in budgerigars and humans.节拍声对虎皮鹦鹉和人类自定节奏轻击任务的影响。
Curr Zool. 2019 Feb;65(1):121-128. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoy075. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
10
Single (1:1) vs. double (1:2) metronomes for the spontaneous entrainment and stabilisation of human rhythmic movements.单节拍器(1:1)与双节拍器(1:2)对人类节律性运动的自发同步与稳定作用
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Dec;236(12):3341-3350. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5382-4. Epub 2018 Sep 25.