Suppr超能文献

分娩时患者自控硬膜外镇痛——持续输注是否有益?

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour--is a continuous infusion of benefit?

作者信息

Paech M J

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, Perth, Western Australia.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 1992 Feb;20(1):15-20. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9202000103.

Abstract

A randomised, single-blind study was conducted among 52 gravida in active labour, to investigate two variants of patient-controlled epidural analgesia--bolus only versus bolus plus infusion. Patient-controlled analgesia variables, using an epidural solution of 0.125% bupivacaine plus fentanyl 3 mcg per ml, were a 4 ml incremental bolus with 15 minute lockout, plus or minus a 4 ml per hour infusion. Up to three additional staff-administered supplements of 0.5% bupivacaine 4 ml (20 mg) were allowed. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to pain relief, supplementary boluses required, satisfaction, side-effects or details of patient-controlled epidural analgesia, with the exception of greater fentanyl usage in the bolus plus infusion group (P less than 0.003). Both groups had high quality analgesia, low rates of bupivacaine usage and were highly satisfied. However, under the conditions of the study, the addition of a continuous background infusion to self-administration conferred no benefit.

摘要

对52名处于活跃期分娩的孕妇进行了一项随机单盲研究,以调查患者自控硬膜外镇痛的两种变体——仅单次推注与单次推注加持续输注。使用0.125%布比卡因加每毫升3微克芬太尼的硬膜外溶液,患者自控镇痛变量为4毫升递增单次推注,锁定时间为15分钟,加或不加每小时4毫升的输注。允许最多额外三次由工作人员给予的4毫升(20毫克)0.5%布比卡因补充剂。除了单次推注加持续输注组芬太尼使用量更多外(P小于0.003),两组在疼痛缓解、所需补充单次推注量、满意度、副作用或患者自控硬膜外镇痛细节方面没有显著差异。两组均有高质量的镇痛效果、低布比卡因使用率且满意度很高。然而,在该研究条件下,在自我给药基础上添加持续背景输注并无益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验