• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者的急诊就诊。第一部分:老年患者与年轻患者就诊情况的比较。

Geriatric patient emergency visits. Part I: Comparison of visits by geriatric and younger patients.

作者信息

Singal B M, Hedges J R, Rousseau E W, Sanders A B, Berstein E, McNamara R M, Hogan T M

机构信息

Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Jul;21(7):802-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81025-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81025-x
PMID:1610036
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe emergency department use by the elderly, to define problems associated with emergency care of the elderly, and to compare these results with those for younger adult patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective, controlled chart review.

SETTING

Six geographically distinct US hospital EDs.

PARTICIPANTS

From each site, a stratified sample (approximately 7:3) of elderly (65 years or older) and nonelderly (21 to 64 years old) control patients treated during the same time period was used.

METHODS

Standardized review of ED records and billing charges. Comparisons of elderly and control patient groups using chi 2 analysis and Mann-Whitney U test (alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS

Four hundred eighteen elderly patients and 175 nonelderly controls were entered into the study. The elderly were more likely to arrive by ambulance (35% versus 11%; P less than .00001). More elderly than controls presented with conditions of either high or intermediate urgency (78% versus 61%; P less than .0003). The elderly more frequently presented with comorbid diseases (94% versus 63%; P less than .00001). Other findings for the elderly included a longer mean stay in the ED (185 versus 155 minutes; P less than .003), higher laboratory (78% versus 53%; P less than .00001) and radiology (77% versus 52%; P less than .00001) test rates, higher mean overall care charges ($471 versus $344; P less than .00001), and an admission rate (47% versus 19%; P less than .00001) twice that of younger adults.

CONCLUSION

Resource use and charges associated with emergency care are higher for the elderly than for younger patients. Increases in emergency resources and personnel or improvement in efficiency will be needed to maintain emergency care at present levels as the US population continues to grow and age.

摘要

目的

描述老年人对急诊科的利用情况,确定与老年人急诊护理相关的问题,并将这些结果与年轻成年患者的结果进行比较。

设计

回顾性对照图表审查。

地点

美国六个地理位置不同的医院急诊科。

参与者

从每个地点选取同一时期接受治疗的老年(65岁及以上)和非老年(21至64岁)对照患者的分层样本(约为7:3)。

方法

对急诊记录和计费进行标准化审查。使用卡方分析和曼-惠特尼U检验(α = 0.05)对老年患者组和对照组进行比较。

结果

418名老年患者和175名非老年对照患者纳入研究。老年人更有可能乘坐救护车前来就诊(35% 对11%;P < 0.00001)。与对照组相比,更多的老年人表现出高度或中度紧急情况(78% 对61%;P < 0.0003)。老年人更频繁地患有合并症(94% 对63%;P < 0.00001)。老年人的其他情况包括在急诊科的平均停留时间更长(185分钟对155分钟;P < 0.003),实验室检查率(78% 对53%;P < 0.00001)和放射学检查率(77% 对52%;P < 0.00001)更高,平均总体护理费用更高(471美元对344美元;P < 0.00001),以及住院率(47% 对19%;P < 0.00001)是年轻人的两倍。

结论

与年轻患者相比,老年人急诊护理的资源使用和费用更高。随着美国人口持续增长和老龄化,需要增加急诊资源和人员或提高效率,以维持目前水平的急诊护理。

相似文献

1
Geriatric patient emergency visits. Part I: Comparison of visits by geriatric and younger patients.老年患者的急诊就诊。第一部分:老年患者与年轻患者就诊情况的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Jul;21(7):802-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81025-x.
2
Geriatric patient emergency visits. Part II: Perceptions of visits by geriatric and younger patients.
Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Jul;21(7):808-13. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81026-1.
3
Use of emergency departments by elderly patients: projections from a multicenter data base.老年患者对急诊科的利用:来自多中心数据库的预测
Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Jul;21(7):819-24. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81028-5.
4
The use and effectiveness of an emergency department observation unit for elderly patients.急诊科观察单元在老年患者中的应用及效果
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 May;41(5):668-77. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.153.
5
Are trends in billing for high-intensity emergency care explained by changes in services provided in the emergency department? An observational study among US Medicare beneficiaries.急诊科提供服务的变化能否解释高强度急诊护理计费的趋势?一项针对美国医疗保险受益人的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 30;8(1):e019357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019357.
6
Emergency department visits in the United States for pediatric depression: estimates of charges and hospitalization.美国急诊科因小儿抑郁症的就诊情况:费用及住院情况估计
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;21(9):1003-14. doi: 10.1111/acem.12457.
7
Comparison of emergency care delivered to children and young adults with complex chronic conditions between pediatric and general emergency departments.儿科和综合急诊科为患有复杂慢性病的儿童和青年提供的急救护理比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;21(7):778-84. doi: 10.1111/acem.12412. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
8
Organisational Factors Induce Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay in Elderly Patients--A Retrospective Cohort Study.组织因素导致老年患者急诊科住院时间延长——一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0135066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135066. eCollection 2015.
9
The Epidemiology of Emergency Department Trauma Discharges in the United States.美国急诊科创伤出院患者的流行病学
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;24(10):1244-1256. doi: 10.1111/acem.13223. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
10
Incidence, admission rates, and economic burden of pediatric emergency department visits for urinary tract infection: data from the nationwide emergency department sample, 2006 to 2011.2006年至2011年全国急诊科样本中尿路感染患儿急诊科就诊的发病率、入院率及经济负担
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Oct;11(5):246.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.005. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Drivers of Frequent Emergency Department Use in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Older Adults: A Qualitative Study.社会经济地位不利的老年人频繁使用急诊科的驱动因素:一项定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Sep;73(9):2808-2818. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19616. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
The mobile seniors' clinic - an innovative transition of care for frail older adults.移动老年诊所——体弱老年人护理的创新转型。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05490-4.
3
[Multimorbidity as a predictor for inpatient admission in clinical emergency and acute medicine : Single-center cluster analysis].
[多重疾病作为临床急诊和急性医学中住院患者入院的预测因素:单中心聚类分析]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Jun;120(5):419-425. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01180-6. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
4
Nonmedical problems among older adults visiting the emergency department for low acuity conditions: A prospective multicentre cohort study.因低 acuity 状况前往急诊科就诊的老年人中的非医疗问题:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。 注:这里“acuity”可能是“acute”的错误拼写,结合语境推测应是“急性的”意思,所以更准确的翻译或许是:因低急性状况前往急诊科就诊的老年人中的非医疗问题:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。 但按要求严格翻译就是上述译文 。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 3;10(15):e35352. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35352. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
5
Comparison of Manchester, qSOFA, emergency severity index, and national early warning scores for prognostic estimation and effective triage system in geriatric patients.比较曼彻斯特、qSOFA、紧急严重程度指数和国家早期预警评分在老年患者预后评估和有效分诊系统中的作用。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Aug;193(4):2051-2059. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03664-y. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
6
Association of nutritional status and comorbidity with long-term survival among community-dwelling older males.社区居住的老年男性营养状况和合并症与长期生存的关系。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):697. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04413-z.
7
Differences in Characteristics and Length of Stay of Elderly Emergency Patients before and after the Outbreak of COVID-19.COVID-19 爆发前后老年急诊患者特征和住院时间的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;20(2):1162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021162.
8
[Characteristics of older versus younger emergency patients : Analysis of over 356,000 visits from the AKTIN German emergency department data registry].[老年与年轻急诊患者的特征:对德国AKTIN急诊科数据登记处超过35.6万次就诊情况的分析]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 Feb;119(1):18-26. doi: 10.1007/s00063-022-00968-8. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
9
Profile of Geriatric Patients Attending the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi: A Cross-Sectional Study.卡拉奇一家三级护理医院急诊科老年患者概况:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2022 Feb 3;14(2):e21874. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21874. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Spatial Accessibility Assessment of Prehospital EMS with a Focus on the Elderly Population: A Case Study in Ningbo, China.基于中国宁波市的老年人案例研究,对院前急救医疗服务的空间可达性进行评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 22;18(19):9964. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18199964.