CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, 1401 18ième rue, Québec, G1J1Z4, Canada.
Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05490-4.
This study aims to evaluate the impact of Quebec's first hospital-at-home-inspired mobile Seniors' Clinic, the "Clinique des Ainés (CDA)", on frail older adults' returns to the Emergency Department (ED), mortality, and hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) and rehospitalizations.
Design: Quasi-experimental pre-post implementation cohort study.
Patients aged ≥ 75 years admitted to the short-term geriatric unit after an ED consultation (control) or included by the CDA (intervention).
return to ED (RtoED), mortality, ED & hospital LOS, and rehospitalizations.
Multivariable regression modelling.
Overall, 891 patients were included. At the intervention site (CDA) (n = 437), RtoED were similar at 30 (17.5% & 19.5%, p = 0.58), 90 (34.4% & 37.3%, p = 0.46) and 180 days (47.2% & 54.0%, p = 0.07) in the pre and post-implementation phases. No mortality differences were found. The hospitalization LOS was significantly shorter (28.26 and 14.22 days, p < 0.01). At 90 days, rehospitalization LOS was decreased by 8.51 days (p = 0.02) and by 6.48 days at 180 days (p = 0.03). Compared to the control site (n = 454) in the post-implementation phase, RtoED was 54% at the intervention site compared to 44.1% (p = 0.02) at 180 days. The CDA had a lower adjusted probability of mortality at 90 days compared to the control site (4.8% VS 11.7%, p = 0.03). No rehospitalization LOS differences were noted.
The Clinique des Ainés showed effectiveness in caring for frail older patients in their homes by decreasing their hospital LOS by half and 90 days mortality risk. It was a safe care trajectory without a clinically significant increase in ED returns or mortality.
本研究旨在评估魁北克首个受医院居家启发的移动老年人诊所(“老年人诊所”)对体弱老年人返回急诊部(ED)、死亡率以及住院时间(LOS)和再入院的影响。
设计:准实验前后实施队列研究。
在 ED 咨询后入住短期老年病房的年龄≥75 岁的患者(对照组)或被 CDA 纳入的患者(干预组)。
返回 ED(RtoED)、死亡率、ED 和医院 LOS 以及再入院。
多变量回归模型。
共有 891 名患者入组。在干预地点(CDA)(n=437),前、后实施阶段 30 天(17.5%和 19.5%,p=0.58)、90 天(34.4%和 37.3%,p=0.46)和 180 天(47.2%和 54.0%,p=0.07)的 RtoED 相似。未发现死亡率差异。住院 LOS 显著缩短(28.26 和 14.22 天,p<0.01)。90 天时,再入院 LOS 减少了 8.51 天(p=0.02),180 天时减少了 6.48 天(p=0.03)。与后实施阶段的对照组(n=454)相比,干预组在 180 天时的 RtoED 为 54%,而对照组为 44.1%(p=0.02)。与对照组相比,CDA 在 90 天时的死亡率调整概率较低(4.8%比 11.7%,p=0.03)。未注意到再入院 LOS 的差异。
老年人诊所通过将患者的住院 LOS 缩短一半,并降低 90 天的死亡率,成功为体弱老年人提供了在家中的护理服务。该诊所的护理轨迹是安全的,没有明显增加 ED 返诊或死亡率。