Lopez O L, Becker J T, Jagust W J, Fitzpatrick A, Carlson M C, DeKosky S T, Breitner J, Lyketsos C G, Jones B, Kawas C, Kuller L H
Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA 15213, USA.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;77(2):159-65. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.045567. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
To describe the neuropsychological characteristics of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subgroups identified in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) cognition study.
MCI was classified as MCI-amnestic type (MCI-AT): patients with documented memory deficits but otherwise normal cognitive function; and MCI-multiple cognitive deficits type (MCI-MCDT): impairment of at least one cognitive domain (not including memory), or one abnormal test in at least two other domains, but who had not crossed the dementia threshold. The MCI subjects did not have systemic, neurological, or psychiatric disorders likely to affect cognition.
MCI-AT (n = 10) had worse verbal and non-verbal memory performance than MCI-MCDT (n = 28) or normal controls (n = 374). By contrast, MCI-MCDT had worse language, psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and visuoconstructional function than MCI-AT or normal controls. MCI-MCDT subjects had memory deficits, though they were less pronounced than in MCI-AT. Of the MCI-MCDT cases, 22 (78.5%) had memory deficits, and 6 (21.5%) did not. MCI-MCDT with memory disorders had more language deficits than MCI-MCDT without memory disorders. By contrast, MCI-MCDT without memory deficits had more fine motor control deficits than MCI-MCDT with memory deficits.
The most frequent form of MCI was the MCI-MCDT with memory deficits. However, the identification of memory impaired MCI groups did not reflect the true prevalence of MCI in a population, as 16% of all MCI cases and 21.5% of the MCI-MCDT cases did not have memory impairment. Study of idiopathic amnestic and non-amnestic forms of MCI is essential for an understanding of the aetiology of MCI.
描述在心血管健康研究(CHS)认知研究中确定的轻度认知障碍(MCI)亚组的神经心理学特征。
MCI被分为遗忘型MCI(MCI-AT):有记忆缺陷记录但认知功能其他方面正常的患者;以及多认知缺陷型MCI(MCI-MCDT):至少一个认知领域(不包括记忆)受损,或至少两个其他领域的一项测试异常,但尚未达到痴呆阈值的患者。MCI受试者没有可能影响认知的全身性、神经系统或精神疾病。
MCI-AT(n = 10)在言语和非言语记忆表现方面比MCI-MCDT(n = 28)或正常对照组(n = 374)更差。相比之下,MCI-MCDT在语言、心理运动速度、精细运动控制和视觉构建功能方面比MCI-AT或正常对照组更差。MCI-MCDT受试者存在记忆缺陷,尽管不如MCI-AT明显。在MCI-MCDT病例中,22例(78.5%)有记忆缺陷,6例(21.5%)没有。有记忆障碍的MCI-MCDT比没有记忆障碍的MCI-MCDT有更多的语言缺陷。相比之下,没有记忆缺陷的MCI-MCDT比有记忆缺陷的MCI-MCDT有更多的精细运动控制缺陷。
MCI最常见的形式是伴有记忆缺陷的MCI-MCDT。然而,记忆受损的MCI组的识别并未反映MCI在人群中的真实患病率,因为所有MCI病例的16%和MCI-MCDT病例的21.5%没有记忆障碍。对特发性遗忘型和非遗忘型MCI形式的研究对于理解MCI的病因至关重要。