Poxton Ian R
Division of Medical Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Diseases, University of Edinburgh College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Edinburgh, UK.
Med Princ Pract. 2005;14 Suppl 1:20-6. doi: 10.1159/000086181.
The diagnosis and management of bacterial diseases has been done by traditional methods for a century or more. With the advent of molecular methods, however, these traditional approaches are being challenged. This review examines the pros and cons of traditional versus modern methods and tries to answer the question: when are molecular methods useful or essential? The following topics are addressed with appropriate examples: diagnosis; identification, typing and fingerprinting; pathogenesis; patient management; susceptibility to disease, and resistance to antimicrobial agents. It was concluded that there is still a place for both traditional and modern molecular methods, and training of staff must include both methodologies. Innovation is encouraged--but new technologies must be thoroughly tested before introduction into the routine lab. Liaison between laboratory scientist and physician is important, but above all experience is paramount.
一个多世纪以来,细菌性疾病的诊断和管理一直采用传统方法。然而,随着分子方法的出现,这些传统方法正受到挑战。本综述探讨了传统方法与现代方法的优缺点,并试图回答以下问题:分子方法何时有用或必不可少?以下主题将通过适当的例子进行阐述:诊断;鉴定、分型和指纹识别;发病机制;患者管理;易感性和对抗菌药物的耐药性。得出的结论是,传统方法和现代分子方法都仍有其用武之地,员工培训必须涵盖这两种方法。鼓励创新——但新技术在引入常规实验室之前必须经过全面测试。实验室科学家与医生之间的沟通很重要,但最重要的是经验至关重要。