Coté Timothy R, Mohan Aparna K, Polder Jacquelyn A, Walton Marc K, Braun M Miles
Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Sep;53(3):407-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.06.011.
Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) (Botox) received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for therapeutic treatment of strabismus and blepharospasm in 1989, cervical dystonia in 2000, and cosmetic treatment of glabellar wrinkles (Botox Cosmetic) in 2002. In 2002 alone there were approximately 1.1 to 1.6 million patients using cosmetic BTA. Our objective was to review adverse event (AE) reporting to the FDA after BTA administration.
We reviewed all (therapeutic and cosmetic use) serious (per FDA regulations) AEs reported to the FDA for the 13.5 years since licensure of the product (December 1989-May 2003) and nonserious AEs reported from December 2001 to November 2002. AEs are reported to the FDA through the MedWatch system.
We reviewed 1437 AE reports; 406 followed therapeutic use of BTA (217 serious and 189 nonserious) and 1031 followed cosmetic use (36 serious and 995 nonserious). Reported AEs occurred predominantly in female patients, with a median age of 50 years. In the year December 2001 to November 2002, when both serious and nonserious reports were evaluated, the proportion of reports classified as serious was 33-fold higher for therapeutic than for cosmetic cases. The 217 serious AEs reported in therapeutic cases involved a wide spectrum of events and included all 28 reported deaths. Among cosmetic users, no deaths were reported and, of the 36 serious AEs, 30 were included as possible complications in the FDA-approved label. The remaining 6 serious AEs did not display a pattern suggesting a common causal relationship to BTA. Among the 995 cosmetic cases reported to have nonserious AEs, most commonly noted were lack of effect (623, 63%), injection site reaction (190, 19%), and ptosis (111, 11%).
Serious AEs were more likely to be reported for therapeutic than for cosmetic use, which may be related to higher doses, complicated underlying diseases, or both. Among cosmetic cases, few serious AEs were reported, and these were predominantly events that were previously recognized in clinical trials of BTA for the labeled use. This study is limited primarily by the incomplete nature of AE reporting by clinicians. Numerous departures from FDA-approved recommendations for drug dose, dilution, handling, site of injection, and storage were noted in these AE reports.
A型肉毒杆菌毒素(BTA,商品名保妥适)于1989年获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于斜视和眼睑痉挛的治疗,2000年获批用于治疗颈部肌张力障碍,2002年获批用于眉间皱纹的美容治疗(保妥适美容针)。仅在2002年,就有约110万至160万患者使用美容用BTA。我们的目的是回顾向FDA报告的BTA注射后的不良事件(AE)。
我们回顾了自该产品获批(1989年12月至2003年5月)13.5年以来向FDA报告的所有(治疗和美容用途)严重(根据FDA规定)AE,以及2001年12月至2002年11月报告的非严重AE。AE通过MedWatch系统向FDA报告。
我们回顾了1437份AE报告;406份是BTA治疗用途后的报告(217份严重和189份非严重),1031份是美容用途后的报告(36份严重和995份非严重)。报告的AE主要发生在女性患者中,中位年龄为50岁。在2001年12月至2002年11月期间,当对严重和非严重报告进行评估时,治疗病例中被分类为严重报告的比例比美容病例高33倍。治疗病例中报告的217例严重AE涉及广泛的事件,包括报告的所有28例死亡。在美容使用者中,未报告死亡病例,在36例严重AE中,30例被列为FDA批准标签中可能的并发症。其余6例严重AE未显示出与BTA有共同因果关系的模式。在报告有非严重AE的995例美容病例中,最常见的是效果不佳(623例,63%)、注射部位反应(190例,19%)和上睑下垂(111例,11%)。
治疗用途比美容用途更有可能报告严重AE,这可能与更高的剂量、复杂的基础疾病或两者都有关。在美容病例中,报告的严重AE很少,且这些主要是BTA用于标签用途的临床试验中先前已确认的事件。本研究主要受临床医生AE报告不完整的限制。在这些AE报告中,注意到许多与FDA批准的药物剂量、稀释、处理、注射部位和储存建议不符的情况。