Fontvieille A M, Rizkalla S W, Penfornis A, Acosta M, Bornet F R, Slama G
Department of Diabetes, Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France.
Diabet Med. 1992 Jun;9(5):444-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1992.tb01815.x.
The aim of the present study was to determine whether any benefit might occur from lowering the glycaemic index of diet in the medium term in diabetic patients. Eighteen well-controlled diabetic patients (12 Type 1 and 6 Type 2 non-insulin-treated), were assigned to either a high mean glycaemic index or low mean glycaemic index diet for 5 weeks each in a random order using a cross-over design. The two diets were equivalent in terms of nutrient content and total and soluble fibre content. The glycaemic indices were 64 +/- 2 (mean +/- SD) % and 38 +/- 5% for the two diets. The high glycaemic index diet was enriched in bread and potato and the low glycaemic index diet in pasta, rice, and legumes. At the end of the study periods, the following variables were improved on the low compared to the high glycaemic index diet: fructosamine (3.9 +/- 0.9 vs 3.4 +/- 0.4 mmol l-1, p less than 0.05); fasting blood glucose (10.8 +/- 2.8 vs 9.6 +/- 2.7 mmol l-1, p less than 0.02); 2-h postprandial blood glucose (11.6 +/- 2.9 vs 10.3 +/- 2.5 mmol l-1, p less than 0.02); mean daily blood glucose (12.0 +/- 2.5 vs 10.4 +/- 2.7 mmol l-1, p less than 0.02); serum triglycerides (1.5 +/- 0.9 vs 1.2 +/- 0.6 mmol l-1, p less than 0.05). No significant differences were found in body weight, HbA1C, insulin binding to erythrocytes, insulin and drug requirements, and other circulating lipids (cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, phospholipids, Apolipoprotein A1, Apolipoprotein B). Thus the inclusion of low glycaemic index foods in the diet of diabetic patients may be an additional measure which slightly but favourably influences carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, requires only small changes in nutritional habits and has no known deleterious effects.
本研究的目的是确定糖尿病患者从中期降低饮食血糖指数中是否可能获益。18名病情得到良好控制的糖尿病患者(12名1型和6名2型非胰岛素治疗患者),采用交叉设计,随机依次接受高平均血糖指数或低平均血糖指数饮食各5周。两种饮食在营养成分、总膳食纤维和可溶性膳食纤维含量方面相当。两种饮食的血糖指数分别为64±2(平均值±标准差)%和38±5%。高血糖指数饮食富含面包和土豆,低血糖指数饮食富含面食、大米和豆类。在研究期结束时,与高血糖指数饮食相比,低血糖指数饮食使以下变量得到改善:果糖胺(3.9±0.9 vs 3.4±0.4 mmol l-1,p<0.05);空腹血糖(10.8±2.8 vs 9.6±2.7 mmol l-1,p<0.02);餐后2小时血糖(11.6±2.9 vs 10.3±2.5 mmol l-1,p<0.02);每日平均血糖(12.0±2.5 vs 10.