Suppr超能文献

医疗机构中自闭症知识的调查。

A survey of autism knowledge in a health care setting.

作者信息

Heidgerken Amanda D, Geffken Gary, Modi Avani, Frakey Laura

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Box 100234, FL 32610, USA.

出版信息

J Autism Dev Disord. 2005 Jun;35(3):323-30. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-3298-x.

Abstract

The current study extends research by Stone [Cross-disciplinary perspectives on autism? Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 12, (1988) 615; A comparison of teacher and parent views of autism. Journal of Autism and Development Disorders, 18, (1988) 403] exploring the knowledge and beliefs about autism across multiple health care professions. One hundred and eleven CARD personnel (i.e., professional with the Center for Autism Related Disabilities, CARD), specialists (i.e., psychiatry, speech and language pathology, and clinical psychology), and primary health care providers (i.e., family practice, pediatrics, and neurology) completed a measure assessing knowledge of diagnostic criteria, course, treatment, and prognosis of autism. Results indicated that all three groups reflected accurate endorsement of the DSM-IV criteria. Primary health care providers and specialists were found to differentially endorse a variety of statements regarding prognosis, course, and treatment in comparison with CARD. Overall, primary providers demonstrated the greatest number of differences. Clinical implications and future recommendations are discussed.

摘要

当前的研究扩展了斯通的研究[关于自闭症的跨学科视角?《儿科心理学杂志》,12,(1988)615;教师与家长对自闭症看法的比较。《自闭症与发育障碍杂志》,18,(1988)403],探索了多个医疗保健专业对自闭症的认识和看法。111名自闭症相关残疾中心(CARD)的工作人员(即自闭症相关残疾中心的专业人员)、专家(即精神病学、言语和语言病理学以及临床心理学方面的专家)以及初级医疗保健提供者(即家庭医学、儿科学和神经学方面的人员)完成了一项评估对自闭症诊断标准、病程、治疗和预后知识的测评。结果表明,所有三组都准确认可了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的标准。与CARD相比,发现初级医疗保健提供者和专家对关于预后、病程和治疗的各种陈述的认可存在差异。总体而言,初级提供者表现出的差异最多。文中讨论了临床意义和未来建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验