Suppr超能文献

Hempelian and Kuhnian approaches in the philosophy of medicine: the Semmelweis case.

作者信息

Gillies Donald

机构信息

Department of Science and Technology Studies, University College London, Gower Street, London WCIE 6Bt, UK.

出版信息

Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2005 Mar;36(1):159-81. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.12.003.

Abstract

Semmelweis's investigations of puerperal fever are some of the most interesting in the history of medicine. This paper considers analysis of the Semmelweis case. It argues that this analysis is inadequate and needs to be supplemented by some Kuhnian ideas. Kuhn's notion of paradigm needs to be modified to apply to medicine in order to take account of the classification schemes involved in medical theorising. However with a suitable modification it provides an explanation of Semmelweis's failure which is argued to be superior to some of the external reasons often given. Despite this success in applying Kuhn's ideas to medicine, it is argued that these ideas must be further modified to take account of the fact that medicine is not a natural science but primarily a practice designed to prevent and cure diseases.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验