Kelly Michael P, Russo Federica
Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, UK.
Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Jan;40(1):82-99. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12621. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
Research in the health sciences has been highly successful in revealing the aetiologies of many morbidities, particularly those involving the microbiology of communicable disease. This success has helped form a narrative to be found in numerous public health documents, about interventions to reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases (e.g., obesity or alcohol related pathologies). These focus on tackling the purported pathogenic factors causing the diseases as a means of prevention. In this paper, we argue that this approach has been sub-optimal. The mechanisms of aetiology and of prevention are sometimes significantly different and failure to make this distinction has hindered efforts at preventing non-communicable diseases linked to diet, exercise and alcohol consumption. We propose a sociological approach as an alternative based on social practice theory. (A virtual abstract for this paper can be found at: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_979cmCmR9rLrKuD7z0ycA).
健康科学领域的研究在揭示许多疾病的病因方面取得了巨大成功,尤其是那些涉及传染病微生物学的疾病。这一成功促成了众多公共卫生文件中有关减少非传染性疾病(如肥胖症或与酒精相关的病症)负担的干预措施的一种说法。这些措施着重于应对所谓导致疾病的致病因素,以此作为预防手段。在本文中,我们认为这种方法并非最优。病因学机制和预防机制有时存在显著差异,未能区分这一点阻碍了预防与饮食、运动和饮酒相关的非传染性疾病的努力。我们提出一种基于社会实践理论的社会学方法作为替代方案。(本文的虚拟摘要可在以下网址查看:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_979cmCmR9rLrKuD7z0ycA)